Historical Information for Midrange Computers – Thesis Example
Running Head: Historical Information for Historical Information for Midrange Computers of Submission
Historical Information for Midrange Computers
Introduction to Midrange Computers
Midrange computers (also called midrange systems) are a category of computers that fall between the microcomputers and the mainframe computers. This technology emerged in the late 1960s and then the midrange computers were known as minicomputers. Noted midrange computer ranges were produced by IBM, HP, Sun Microsystems, etc. The 1980s have witnessed fierce competition between INM and Digital Equipment in this segment. However, by 1998, IBM again emerged as the major producer of the midrange systems. By the year 2002, client-server platforms and midrange computers almost mingled together technology-wise and expanded the sphere of enterprise spanning storage management. In the contemporary business environment, midrange systems are being used for electronic data interchange, B2B communication, and customer relationship management. These systems are becoming increasingly popular. (Datalink, 2007; Rojas, 2001)
Midrange computers have been increasingly incorporated in the client-server architecture, which involves synchronized programs in an IT application. The server provides a service to one or more clients that send requests for it. Midrange computers are thus enabled with database access, web access, email exchange, etc., which are based on this architecture. (Berson, 1996)
In client-server model, the clients share the resources like database, hardware, applications, etc. through a server. Network computing is an apt example of utilizing shared resources. (Berson, 1996)
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages include distribution of responsibilities and roles in a computer system through numerous independent computers, which facilitates decentralization, redundancy, etc. Replacement, repairing, upgrading, and relocating the components of such systems are easier. Disadvantages include server overload and risk of network intrusion. If the server is down, the whole system is down.
This system uses distributive application architecture. The member computers of such a system (or network) are equally powerful. (Subramanian and Goodman, 2005)
Shared systems in peer-to-peer structure facilitate file and application sharing without the requirement of a central coordination. Peers are consumers as well as suppliers of the resources. (Subramanian and Goodman, 2005)
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages include higher computing power, storage space and bandwidth. Distributive architecture makes the system robust. However, this system lacks effective mechanisms for file security. If a malicious code enters the system through a network node, the entire network may shatter down.
Security/Risk with regards to Midrange Technology
Privacy: Since midrange technology is primarily client-server model based, privacy can be ensured by implementing appropriate security policies through the central server. (Newman, 2010; Berson, 1996)
Disclosure of Data: Information in storage or during transmission through network resources may be disclosed by hacking, spyware, etc. Encryption can be used to solve this problem. (Newman, 2010)
Data Access: Technologies like SQL, XML, Web Services, etc. can be used in the midrange computers to facilitate data access secure. (Newman, 2010)
Secure Data Deletion: This is a general issue in the context of computers. Hard disc shredding and multiple overwrites are suggestible in this regard. (University of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Key Management: Midrange computer system can provide secured encryption method through a central server along with effective public and private key management. (Ryabko and Fianov, 2005)
Audit Rights: Audit rights can be implemented to midrange computing, which will enhance security through account management, system events tracking, recording logons and logoffs, etc. A Windows 2000 (or later version) environment is particularly helpful in this regard. (Robichaux, 2000)
Government regulation/policies and privacy protection play a key role in implementation and security of midrange computing since this sort of technology is exposed to public network. “The E-Government Act [Public Law 107-347] passed by the 107th Congress and signed into law by the President in December 2002 recognized the importance of information security to the economic and national security interests of the United States” (HG.org-HGExperts.com, 2011). This sort of regulations cover midrange computing as well, since midrange computing has extensive use in ecommerce, higher education, research, etc. In the context of ecommerce, it should be further mentioned that on 30th June, 2000, President Bill Clinton signed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) using his own electronic signature ID, and established the validity of electronic signatures in relation to international and interstate commerce (HG.org-HGExperts.com, 2011). This legislation adds security to midrange computing at the levels of Point of Sales, electronic fund transfer, etc. Moreover, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 1996, Electronic Communication Privacy Act 1986, Health Information Technology Act 2009, etc. are important regulations, which ensure protection and integrity of the computer systems in general. (Newman, 2010)
Berson, A. (1996). Client/Server Architecture. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Datalink. (2007). Datalink Reports 2007 Third-Quarter Operating Results. (Financial report). Retrieved May 26, 2011 from http://goliath.ecnext.com/premium/0199/0199-7076220.html
HG.org-HGExperts.com. (2011). Computer Law – Guide to Computer Law. Retrieved May 26, 2011 from http://www.hg.org/compute.html
Newman, R.C. (2010). Computer Security: Protecting Digital Resources. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Robichaux, P. (2000). Managing the Windows 2000 Registry. Sebastopol: O’Reill Media Inc.
Rojas, R. (2001). Encyclopaedia of Computers and Computer History, Volume 1. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
Ryabko, B. and Fionov, A. (2005). Basics of Contemporary Cryptography for IT Practitioners. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Subramanian, R. and Goodman, B.D. (2005). Peer-To-Peer Computing: The Evolution of a Disruptive Technology. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
University of Pennsylvania. (2011). Secure Data Deletion. Retrieved May 26, 2011 from http://www.upenn.edu/computing/security/privacy/data_clear.php