The paper "Aggression is not a Standard Character in Humanity " is a great example of a term paper on history. Since medieval times, humans have experienced conflicts in many perspectives. From the scramble of resources to differences in opinion, there has never been a lack of triggers. Even in modern times, the world has had to deal with some of the worst conflicts in recorded history. For instance the United Nations cam into being as a result of global conflicts that necessitated people from around the globe to think of ways to deal with conflict before it degenerates into war.
In almost a century, the world has not seen a major global conflict. The worst has been regional strife where interests within a specific part of the globe compete for dominance. It is as if aggression is an innate aspect in humans since everyone tries to prevail over the others and resorts to force when this does not occur. But this is arguable because not all humans have this tendency. Some resort to handling issues amicably to ensure peace prevails. This paper demonstrates that aggression is not a standard character in humanity and that the world is on course to realize lasting peace. Cold war At the height of the cold war, many expected the struggle for dominance between the two global superpowers to degenerate into a full-blown war.
However, things took a different twist when the USA and USSR decided to rally regional powers behind them. This is exactly how the two global wars unfolded but in this scenario, the superpowers saw that the only way to attain dominance was through ideology (STONE, 675).
In the end, it became a matter of communism versus capitalism. It is very clear which side won since even the then leading communist power has since disintegrated into fragments such as Russia and Ukraine among other members of the former Soviet Union. The mentioned countries are now staunch capitalistic economies. The USA prevailed in the battle of ideologies and continues to exert its dominance globally (Barnes, 130 ). The fact that this never turned into a vicious conflict was that the world had learned its lesson from the last global wars and was cautious about the destructive nature of war.
If it was true that aggression was human nature then history would have been different as we know it. It could have included a vicious war between these two giants whose consequences could have been much worse than the world wars. Political and economic dominance Like in the above case, events from the century have recently been playing in the global arena. The only difference is that the players are slightly different. Recently, most developed nations have been concerned about the rising influence of China globally.
This Asian nation has been making headlines for its rapid economic growth that has since surpassed Japan to become the world’ s second-largest economy. Experts predict it is scheduled to overtake the USA by 2030. Recently, the Chinese have been making diplomatic inroads in the developing world especially Africa where it is now among the major investors and economic partners. This has led many to the speculation that this could lead to a conflict between the USA and China. However, this will never be possible because the world has now matured.
All countries seem to be concerned about their interests as opposed to the past. What fueled the two global wars was that countries had entered into secret pacts to defend one another. This is no longer the case as most countries are busy growing their economies. There is no way they will be convinced to neglect such a serious engagement for one that can only inflict more damage to humanity. For this reason, it is safe to say that global peace is not at stake and the two powers will have to work out a way to coexist even in the event of changing economic status.
The fact that China has embarked upon a strategy to grow its economy and increase its diplomatic influence globally is testament to the fact that aggression is not innate in humans. On the other hand, it could have chosen to build military capacity and attack its rivals.
Baker, Raymond William. "Screening Islam: Terrorism, American Jihad, and the New Islamists." Arab Studies Quarterly 25.1 (2003): 33-56. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Barnes, Trevor J. "American Geography, Social Science and the Cold War." Geography 100 (2015): 126-32. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Berliner, Daniel, and Aseem Prakash. "The United Nations Global Compact: An Institutionalist Perspective." Journal of Business Ethics 122.2 (2014): 217-23. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Boxx, S. E. "Observations on the Air War in Syria." Air & Space Power Journal 27.2 (2013): 147-68. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Edwards, Daniel W., et al. "Impulsiveness, Impulsive Aggression, Personality Disorder, and Spousal Violence." Violence and Victims 18.1 (2003): 3-14. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Maass, Matthias. "North Korea as a "Quasi-Nuclear Weapons State"." Korea Observer 41.1 (2010): 131-60. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Merkle, Judith A., S.N.DdeN. "GLOBALIZATION, SPIRITUALITY, AND JUSTICE: NAVIGATING THE PATH TO PEACE." Theological Studies 70.3 (2009): 727-8. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Miczek, Klaus A., Sietse de Boer F., and Jozsef Haller. "Excessive Aggression as a Model of Violence: A Critical Evaluation of Current Preclinical Methods." Psychopharmacology 226.3 (2013): 445-58. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
Möller, Ingrid, et al. "Efficacy of an Intervention to Reduce the use of Media Violence and Aggression: An Experimental Evaluation with Adolescents in Germany." Journal of Youth and Adolescence 41.2 (2012): 105-20. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.
STONE, DAN. "Cold War Ideas." Contemporary European History 22.4 (2013): 675-86. ProQuest. Web. 7 May 2016.