How ICAO Can Help the Member States that Have Difficulties in Implementing its Standards – Term Paper Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "How ICAO Can Help the Member States that Have Difficulties in Implementing its Standards" is a great example of a term paper on politics. INTRODUCTION This paper examines the difficulties facing a number of ICAO member states and further outlines proposals on how ICAO can help these states in meeting the safety standards. This is in line with the realization that the majority of the member states are facing a number of challenges in successfully implementing most of the aviation safety regulations. ICAO is an acronym for the International Civil Aviation Organization whose constitution is formulated under what is termed as the Chicago convention.

This organization is empowered by its constitution to examine the safety of the aviation industry in line with other regulations. It is made up of a total of a hundred and eighty-nine member states. The member states of this organization are drawn from all ends of the world including Africa and Asia. Background of the challenges The international civil aviation organization while operating with its technical cooperation program has been able to outline several regulations in an effort to foster the safety of the aviation industry.

It is thus saddening that even with all its efforts, there are still a large number of the member states that have not confirmed to its standards. Most of these states exhibit a very big failure in the development of the capability to uphold safety oversight. This has been indicated in an audit performed on a number of member states in the recent past. Most of the member states attribute their failure to comply with the lack of adequate funding. This is an aspect that translates into the inability to afford competent expertise (Lelieur 2003).

The situation has forced the international civil aviation organization to come to the conclusion that a number of both regional and sub-regional organizations are needed to effectively oversee safety regulations. The ICAO, therefore, realizes the need for shared responsibility in fostering the objectives and strategies that can uphold safety (Kim 2009). This according to the organization calls for the need to harness the member states to jointly pool their resources towards attracting and at the same time retaining the most competent personnel. This organization acknowledges the fact that every member state has its absolute sovereignty regarding its territory in the airspace.

The member states on their part are held with the responsibility of ensuring that they meet the obligations that are bestowed on them by the Chicago convention regarding the safety of the aviation industry. This requires that the member states of the organization subject themselves to the outlined standards and regulations in an effort to uphold international safety measures in the industry (ICAO 2009). The regulations outlined by this organization with reference to the safety of the aviation industry, therefore, require that all the member states operate under standards that are internationally accepted.

This calls for the member states to effectively cooperate by upholding the standards to the highest degree. This is thought to be an aspect that will in the long run foster the harmonization and standardization of the outlined regulations and standards. The compliance with the outlined safety standards is a requirement that appears in the twelfth and the thirty-seventh articles of the Chicago convention.

Issues of major concern in the implementation of the safety regulations thus revolve around the legislation of the aviation industry, the regulations with which the operations in the industry are governed, the civil aviation system alongside the oversight roles of the state. The specific qualifications of the technical crew and the type of technical support are also included. This is coupled with the licensing and authorization regulations. The surveillance and the concerns regarding the resolution of safety are also examined (Button 2004).

References

Alessandra, 2001, The global navigation satellite system: navigating into the new millennium Studies in Aviation Economics and Management, University of Michigan, Ashgate.

Button, K 2004, ‘Conforming with ICAO safety oversight standards’, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.10, no. 4, pp. 249-255.

Cheng, C 1998, The use of air and outer space cooperation and competition: proceedings of the International Conference on Air and Outer Space at the Service of World Peace and Prosperity, held in Beijing from 21-23 August 1995, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Shanghai.

eTN Team 2008, ‘ICAO airline safety standards for liquids to be put into effect’, Global Travel News, viewed 10 September 2009, .

Gonzalez, R 2007, ‘ICAO News Release’, ICAO Journal, vol. 4, no.7, pp.123-124.

ICAO 2008, ‘Air evolution’, ICAO Journal, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1-10.

ICAO 2009, ICAO Safety Management courses. Retrieved on 10th Sept 2009 from http://www.paris.icao.int/news/20090206.htm.

International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers Associations 2001, ‘International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers’, The Controller, vol. 9, no.56, pp.89-98.

Kher, AC 2008, Aviation Safety, viewed 10 September 2009, .

Kim, K 2009, Resolutions Adopted At the 33rd Session of the Assembly, viewed 10 September 2009, < http://www.icao.int/icao/en/assembl/a33/resolutions_a33.pdf>.

Lelieur, I 2003, Law and policy of substantial ownership and effective control of airlines: prospects for change, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Washington.

Milde, M 2008, ‘International Air Law and ICAO’, Essential air and space law, vol. 91, no.5, pp.90-99.

Southwestern University 2008, ‘School of Law’, Southwestern Journal of law and trade in the Americas, vol. 2, no.16, pp.68-79.

Robertson, 2007, The law-making functions of the United Nations, University of Michigan, Michigan.

Royal Aeronautical Society 1997, ‘Royal Aeronautical Society’, The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 101, no.56, pp.8-19.

Ruwantissa, I 2007, Emergent commercial trends and aviation safety, University of Michigan, Michigan.

Schachter, O 1995, ‘United Nations Legal Order’, Michigan Journal, vol. 48, no.3, pp. 56-59.

Soekkha, M 1997, Aviation safety: human factors, system engineering, flight operations, economics, strategies, management, VSP publication, Washington.

Taylor & Francis Group 2004, Europa World Year, Book 1, Taylor & Francis publishing.

United Nations 2007, ‘Yearbook of the United Nations 2005’, United Nations Publications, vol. 10, no.9, pp. 24-39.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us