Resistance to Globalisation in the Contemporary World – Term Paper Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Resistance to Globalisation in the Contemporary World" is an excellent example of a term paper on social science. Globalization has taken center stage in the world today as a revolutionary concept that has changed the way activities are conducted throughout the world. Globalization has made the interaction between nations much easier by eliminating barriers that may have hindered such interactions in the past. Unlike in the past, nations that are miles apart can easily transact, exchange goods and services, social aspects among other issues easily without much regulations or efforts.

The force of globalization is undoubtedly unstoppable in the contemporary world. The integration of different countries has enabled the improvement of the living standards and value of life for many countries. This is because of the ease with which countries can ace different goods and services that are inadequate in their own nations. As a result, globalization has been one of the major drivers of the world economy and has seen emerging nations develop and realization of new markets in the world. However, with all the advantages that globalization has brought to humanity, there are detriments to the spread of globalization that are being experienced in different countries.

Globalization has been blamed for many issues such as cultural erosion and the emergence of illegal trade in some nations. All this is in a bid to alleviate the negative effects of globalization. Though the force is unstoppable, it can only be delayed through such resistances but the eventual effect is inevitable. This assessment will evaluate different articles reflated t the resistance of globalization and worldviews about the same. Middle-income countries and globalization Globalization has taken a toll on emerging nations due to an increase in competition to levels they cannot cope with.

Production costs within these countries remain high and hence developed countries are edging them out from this perspective. As a result, globalization is not advantageous to them and has only added to their immense problems (Evans, 2013). They have been left with the primary production systems and are forced to import finished goods at higher prices from the developed world. This raises the questions of sustainability and the effectiveness of globalization in these countries.

Globalization offers the option of cooperation and competition between the developing and developed world. However, it has emerged that developing countries are finding it hard to cope with competition and hence have resulted in record low economic growth, and poverty within them is still high (Narula & Dunning, 2010). The result has been increasing in production in developed nations and this has seen an increase in the emission of greenhouse emissions by over 46% in the last two decades. Environmentalists and concerned stakeholders are blaming the environmental degradation on globalization and are opposed to its continuation in the manner it has been happening over the last decade. The detriments are now spilling to the developed world as well as the effects of emissions is being felt more than ever before.

The costs of rehabilitation have been increasing over the years and this has the potential of wiping out the developments and progress made in terms of poverty alleviation and achieving millennium development goals. It seems as globalization progresses, more needs and requirements emerge in recovery and repatriation perspective countries are now being forced to increase budgets on environmental concerns that have resulted from globalization activities.

Development goals have been focusing on the world population that faces absolute poverty but critics of globalization have suggested that the whole world population should be included in the formulation of future objectives. This is because globalization and its detrimental effects are affecting all individuals all over the world from one perspective or another (Kalemli‐Ozcan, Papaioannou & Peydró , 2013). Low-income countries have been forced to rely on foreign aid which to some extent is generated from primary products sourced from them and manufactured to finished goods.

The rate of globalization is only making the situation worse for these countries due to their economic, social, and developmental challenges that they face. An evaluation of how foreign relations shape these countries is essential in making meaningful effects of globalization visible for poverty alleviation and the achievement of development goals in the developing world (Mahutga & Smith, 2011).


Alvarez, M. B., & Alessi, E. J. (2012). Human trafficking is more than sex trafficking and prostitution: Implications for social work. Affiliate, 27(2), 142-152. doi:

Asteriou, D., Dimelis, S., & Moudatsou, A. (2014). Globalization and income inequality: A panel data econometric approach for the EU27 countries. Economic Modelling, 36, 592. Retrieved from

Bernstein, J. (2013, November 18). Inequality’s Roots: Beyond Technology. Retrieved January 14, 2014, from New York Times:

Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681-730.

Ekberg, E., & Lange, E. (2014). Business history and economic globalization. Business History, 56(1), 101. Retrieved from

Evans, A. (2013, December 27). Middle-income countries have the casting vote on the future of development. Retrieved January 14, 2014, from The Guardian:

Exodus: Immigration and Multiculturalism in the 21st Century by Paul Collier – review. (2013, November 17). Retrieved January 14, 2014, from The Guardian:

Ezeani, E. (2013). WTO post-Doha: Trade deadlocks and protectionism. Journal of International Trade Law & Policy, 12(3), 272-288. Retrieved from

Irogbe, K. (2013). Globalization and the world trade organization from the perspective of the underdeveloped world. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 38(2), 174-202. Retrieved from

Inman, P. (2013, December 7). WTO agreement condemned as a deal for corporations, not the world's poor. Retrieved January 14, 2014, from The Guardian:

Jaumotte, F., Lall, S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271-309. doi:

Jenkins, S. (2013, December 16). In a globalized world, there is no cure for slavery. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from The Guardian:

Kalemli‐Ozcan, S., Papaioannou, E., & Peydró, J. L. (2013). Financial regulation, financial globalization, and the synchronization of economic activity. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1179-1228.

Kwon, H. S. (2014). Economic theories of low-wage work. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(1), 61. Retrieved from

Mahutga, M. C., & Smith, D. A. (2011). Globalization, the structure of the world economy, and economic development. Social Science Research, 40(1), 257-272.

Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2010). Multinational enterprises, development, and globalization: some clarifications and a research agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 38(3), 263-287.

Nishiyama, H., & Gintani, Y. (2013). The effects of globalization on the elasticity of labor demand and employment. International Economic Journal, 27(1), 11-23. doi:

Sigona, N. (2012). Globalization, rights, and the non-citizen. Sociology, 46(5), 982-988. doi:

Stanziani, A. (2013). The problem of slavery as history: A global approach. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 43(4), 611. Retrieved from

Wang, J., Solan, D., & Xu, B. (2014). CROSS-CULTURE INTEGRATION AND GLOBAL NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 5(1), 93-98. Retrieved from

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us