The paper "Effective Monitoring of Land Access" is a great example of a term paper on agriculture. In monitoring and evaluating the land management system, MERI provides a framework based on monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, and Improvement and is a key aspect in handling and controlling important assets including natural resources as noted by Gurran (2011). Financial, social, human, physical, and natural assets are the major elements in natural resource management (NRM). Monitoring consists of the gathering and examination of information to aid in the making of decisions, guaranteeing responsibility, and giving the ground for learning and evaluation.
It involves measuring the essential factors of NRM projects especially in very critical natural systems there is the uncertainty of the results from exploits. Monitoring and evaluation enable people to be conversant with previous experiences, to allocate and control the resources, and to show the outcomes. The evaluation comprises the evaluation of the results from monitoring compared to the objectives with a view to establish the development made and to identify whether the used frameworks are the right measures. Moreover, it includes time to time determination of the suitability of a project, program, or policy by assessing the research methods used to prepare orderly information that can aid in performance improvement.
As noted by Moudon (2000), specific reports are needed to demonstrate the level to which the intervention or the investment has realized development towards the set outcomes or targets. There is a need to continuously improve the results of the programs or the projects from continuous adaptation, analysis, and discovery and to create an atmosphere where everyone is encouraged to reflect essentially on the efficiency of certain activities and investments. 1.1 Sustainability aspect addressed by MERI It gives details on the extensive conceptual framework that is used for accountability, continuous improvement, and learning by assessing the NRM frameworks.
Secondly, it’ s meant to act as a roadmap used to implement and develop plans for evaluation both at the investment and program levels. Ideally, Land remains a crucial national asset thus thorough and comprehensive monitoring remains an important development policy. Monitoring, evaluation, and reporting provide the feedback which makes it possible for implementers of projects to be held accountable thus building success for the project and preventing recurrence of failures later.
Evaluation and monitoring also provide the platform for democratic governance, participation by the society, informed policy-making, and ensure accountability by policymakers and implementers of projects (Moudon, 2000). Land monitoring comes in handy where issues of land access and tenure are disputable and politicized since It helps promote a constructive, all-inclusive, and a dialogue based on evidence about land thus acting as a tool for empowerment and enabling public participation. Taking ties a broader view, it is prudent that land monitoring remains a fundamental part of the process of land governance. Effective monitoring of land access and tenure has proved to substantiate policy reform cases and policy design.
It makes it possible for the state to carry out an assessment of performance in administration, implementation of policies, and the evaluation of policy effectiveness. It is thus a tool to gauge the outcomes like tenure security, land access for the impoverished in the society, and gauge the effects of land policies on sustainability, food security, and poverty levels.
Andersen, A. N. (2000). The ants of northern Australia: A guide to the monsoonal fauna. Collingwood, Vic: CSIRO Pub.
Commonwealth of Australia (2013). Monitoring evaluation reporting and improvement (MERI)
Gurran, N. (2011). Australian urban land use planning: Principles, systems, and practice. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Trends in urbanization and urban policies in OECD countries: What lessons for China. Paris: OECD.
Lindenmayer, D., & Gibbons, P. (2012). Biodiversity monitoring in Australia. Collingwood, Vic: CSIRO Pub.
Losada, M. R., Rigueiro, R. A., & McAdam, J. (2006). Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management: Proceedings of an International Congress on Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Management held in Lugo, Spain, in April 2004. Wallingford, UK: CABI Pub.
Maliva, R., & Missimer, T. (2012). Arid lands water evaluation and management. Berlin: Springer.
McKenzie, N. (2008). Guidelines for surveying soil and land resources. Collingwood, Vic: CSIRO Publishing.
McKenzie, N. J. (2007). Guidelines for surveying soil and land resources. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing. International Congress on Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Management, Mosquera-
Moudon, A. V. (2000). Monitoring land supply with geographic information systems: Theory, practice, and parcel-based approaches. New York, NY [u.a.: Wiley.
Steudler, D., & Rajabifard, A. (2004) "Evaluation of Land Administration Systems." Land Use Policy 21(4), pp.371-380.
UN ECE (2005). Land Administration in the UNECE Region. Development trends and main principles. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, New York.
Wallace, J. & Williamson, P. (2006). Registration of Marine Interests in Asia-Pacific, 30(3) .pp207-219.
World Bank, (2003). Comparative Study of Land Administration Systems – Global Synthesis, New York.
Young, A. (2000). Land resources: Now and for the future. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.