The paper “ How Language - Both Verbal and Nonverbal - Can Provide a Sense of Identity to Different Groups" is a spectacular example of a term paper on social science. Intercultural communication is essential to understand here since it is the form of communication that happens across cultural boundaries and transmits meaningful and unambiguous information. This process of exchanging the same preserves mutual trust and minimizes the element of aggression within either of the two parties. Culture is indeed a shared system comprising of different beliefs, values, expectations, attitudes, norms, symbols, etc and thus it becomes all the more necessary in the present times to get the hang of such elements within the cultural contexts of a particular area, region or territory.
Respecting the intercultural faith means that this form of communication would indeed be successful with the people who matter within its cultural tenets. (Ting-Toomey, 1999) Intercultural communication is dependent a great deal on the intricacies entailed with the phenomenon of globalization and thus cultural diversity has reduced as a result of the very same. In order to understand intercultural communication, it is necessary that one must comprehend as to how and when verbal and nonverbal communication forms play their respective roles and how the two of them, individually as well as collectively alter or further boost up the message that is thus being conveyed.
(Sherwood, 1999) The difference between verbal and nonverbal communication is immense. These two are different in the sense that verbal communication focuses a great deal on the way words are expressed by the communicator and the nonverbal form takes care of its own self.
However one must comprehend that verbal and nonverbal forms interact with each other so as to produce a wholesome basis of the message which is being transmitted from the sender down to the receiver. This message is in essence comprised of the verbal and nonverbal elements and emphasizes on the exact manner under which the meaning is composed of. The difference emanates from a rational standpoint which distinctively pinpoints the significant directions for both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication. Since verbal form takes care of words alone, it is difficult to know whether or not the communicator meant what he said and how much of the words which he transmitted through his mouth actually were based on the element of honesty and truth.
Now what nonverbal form does is to back up the claims as presented by the verbal basis and at times negate the very same as well. Therefore the distinctions are quite proper and seem to go hand in hand with each other while at the same instance suggest that there are deviations in line with both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication.
(Mahl, 1987) Verbal communication is face-to-face in more instances and suggests the physical presence of the communicator as well as the audience for which the message is being delivered. Verbal communication is also possible through long-distance voice tools like telephone, the Internet and so on. Now moving on towards nonverbal communication, the difference between verbal and the former is of a very basic one. These are wordless messages that are transferred between the sending party and the one who is receiving the very same.
These wordless messages are in the form of gestures, emotions, actions, body language, posture, facial expressions, and eye contact to name a few. Also, nonverbal communication takes into perspective the clothing regimes of the communicator, his hairstyle, the architecture to which he is supported with, the info-graphics and not to forget the different symbols which come in line with his posture and body movements. (Jedlowski, 2006) Thus nonverbal communication could mean so much to the people who want to read about them as well as the ones who do not pay heed to the very same.
The subconscious level emphasizes the need to understand someone from the nonverbal form of communication and thus weigh this individual in line with another one of the same society or a select group of people as well. At times it is also possible that this communicator is judged alongside the rest of the society too. Nonverbal elements are not only present within the oratory schemes but also make their mark within the written texts as well. This means that the handwriting style of the communicator penning down a written piece is also pertinent towards forming up one’ s views in line with nonverbal communication.
Then again there are other features as well which might include the communicator’ s use of emoticons, the spatial arrangements of words and symbols and so on and so forth. However, it has been seen that much of the nonverbal communication has been successful at its interpretation through the face-to-face interactions and the importance is thus focused on these elements in most of the cases.