The paper "Divorce: Dissected in Ethnicity and Community" is a worthy example of a term paper on sociology. Divorce has long been a part of the culture of the United s and in several American families. The United States Census Bureau has gathered data of marriage and divorce rates by country per 1,000 population aged 15-64 years from 1980 to 2007, and the United States held the top spots on both marriage and divorce rates. Reasons for couples for opting to end the marriage vary, and causes to do such act are numerous as well. In this paper, two aspects of divorce will be given attention: statistical figures dissected into various ethnic backgrounds; and the prevalence of divorce in urban versus rural areas.
Many studies have analyzed the trends in divorce through community attributes other than the individual character of the person undergoing the crisis. In this case, divorce variations depending on the ethnic background are viewed. The U.S. Census Bureau presented the year 2001 statistics of the marital history for people 15 years and over, by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Included groups of people are White, non-Hispanic White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic of any race. Concentrating on the total population of the “Ever divorced” characteristic of both men and women from 15 years to over 70, data show that regardless of gender, non-Hispanic Whites had the highest percentage of the specific characteristic, and Asians had the lowest. The literature on reasons why there is a high divorce rate in non-Hispanic Whites is very scarce but culture is a probable factor. With the acceptance of the act in non-Hispanic communities, it is not unusual for couples to break the ties of marriage. On the other hand, there are more articles stating that the small number of divorced Asians in the United States has been pointed out to the cultural upbringing of the said group. Dickerson states that many Asian women live in communities where “many frowns on a practice that many Americans find much more acceptable” (qt. in Silverstein). In the case of conservative cultures as such, we can see that the sanctity of marriage still overpowers divorce. Also, in establishing a link between ethnicity and divorce, there seems to plenty of discussions established with Blacks, as they are cited by many types of research and statistical data as not engaging in further remarriage and are economically affected.
Despite that, there are no cumulative statistics showing over-all urban-rural distinctions in divorce, but rather rates per state only, it is a general finding that urban areas generally have higher divorce rates as compared to rural neighborhoods. Many experts in the fields of psychology, sociology, politics, and economics have often pointed out the fast-paced urbanization and industrialization of the United States as essential contributors to the vulnerability of the American family’s stability (Isaacs 39). There are many questions raised about the issue, but in a study of the least and most stressful cities by Sperling’s Best Places in 2004, Nevada, specifically Las Vegas, had the highest divorce rates (“Tacoma”), strengthening the hypothesis set earlier about divorce and urban communities. In the 2008 data set of the U.S. Census Bureau for divorce rate per 1,000 women 15 years and over, Nevada fell to 22nd in the ranking, replaced by Oklahoma in the top spot with 16.5 compared to 11.2 of the former. North Dakota, one of the country’s least populous states, falls in the last rank of divorce rates in 2008, with only 6.0 (U.S Census Bureau). Several scientific and statistical types of research have shown that urban areas are not trapped in conservative rules and norms for the conduct, have more lenient religious or spiritual obligations, and more population, thus giving individuals the impression of easily switching to a partner that is “more compatible” with them, influencing higher divorce rates. In contrast, rural communities are said to be more adhering to societal norms as deviance attracts criticisms, as well as better religious backgrounds, and lesser population. Many factors have been pointed out as causes of divorce, with most read researches concluding a higher prevalence of divorce in urban communities, still subdivided into several reasons.
It is not certain whether the recent speculations of many institutions and experts on divorce will go as they hypothesize it to be. However, in cited previous works, we can see that there is extensive diversity on divorce as an issue, especially in the United States as a “leading” country in the practice of such. As the country is composed of different groups of people and is currently advancing in industry and urbanization, the future of divorce tendencies and actual statistics will be left to be studied as the years come along and as generations evolve.