The paper "Architecture and Fashion: Where Does One Draw the Line? " is a good example of a term paper on architecture. It is usually posited that there is a conceptual link between the world of fashion designers as well as architectural engineers in how they come up with architectural structures. Ronald Barthes (1967) uses the Eiffel Tower to show the way architecture does symbolize identity, and that popularity of something can end at any particular time. Fashion generally is influenced by change as well as what the society dictates on what is good at a particular time and architecture seems inclined in following the change and trend in fashion.
Adapting to changes in the ideologies and ideas (Eva 1995) of people in each time of the season is at the central focus on architecture is trying to create a link between fashion and the architectural word. Can it be therefore said positively that the art of fashion and architecture are closely linked and cannot be separated based on the fact that they all art? Introduction Architecture has overtime changed an attribute linked to the changes in society where one lives as well as the location, the functional needs, and the change in technology, ideological and theoretical imperatives.
Fashion and architecture one can say come from the same thing, based on the fact that to come up with an architectural landmark such as the Eiffel tower or a design collection such as “ Chanel” then it means one has to plan, assemble all the material, come up with its artistic aspects, develop a plan and cut out the plans and see whether it is acceptable (Neil 1997).
The next important thing would be showing the design in fashion a fashion show is ideal while in Architecture a presentation of the model of the building would be sufficient. This show s to some extent that fashion does interconnect with architecture, it does exploit similar ideas as well as being connected. One would say that drawing a line is just way too impossible but would really involve their historical developments. Ways in Which Fashion and Culture Intersect Ronald Barthes (1967) in The Fashion System, sought to say that the symbols and sign systems are based on what entirely represents the ideas and ideologies that are transmitted through clothing and in his consideration what is transmitted through magazines, fashion editorials or the tabloids.
For instance, when a celebrity wears a new dress, people would shift to that particular mode of dressing as it is linked to them being celebrities, similar and the same as the one won. However, can this be said to mirror what architecture seeks to symbolize? For instance, architecture on its own is usually introduced in a way that is unique and cannot be emulated.
For instance, the Eiffel Tower or the Great Wall of China has not been created in other cities based on the fact that it is only unique and considered a national symbol (Dinnie 2007). What most people seek to do is to create different structures that are only unique to them and would be considered as a national symbol or identity. Fashion and architecture, do intersect on the basis that they are unique, but it is only to the extent of how they are truly unique to particular people that they can be considered as art.
A signifier as understood by Barthes (1967) is the concept or thing that is attached to a particular thing and without it having an intrinsic or essential meaning attached to the signifier then it does lose meaning. Eluding to the Eiffel tower, for instance, its intrinsic meaning is that it is a wonderful work of art, and it is linked to national identity, on the other hand, the name attached to fashion design or dress gives it the symbol of identity as well as meaning.
Fashion and architecture are thus interconnected based on the fact that the artist behind them seeks to give different identities and meanings to their designs in a way that makes them important.
Anthony Giddens, Modernity and Self –Identity in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
Barthes, Roland. The Fashion System. Berkeley: University of California Press 1893(1967).
Breward, Christopher. The Culture of Fashion. A New History of Fashionable Dress. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.
Broadbent, Geoffrey, Bunt, Richard and Jencks, Charles (eds), Signs, Symbols, and Architecture,
Chichester: Wiley, 1980.
Dinnie, Keith. Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann, 2007.
Entwistle, Joanne. The Fashioned Body. Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory. London: Polity Press, 2000.
Eva, Forgacs. The Bauhaus Idea and Bauhaus Politics. Central European Press, 1995.
Evans, Caroline. Fashion at the Edge. Spectacle, Modernity, and Deathliness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.
Glancey, J. C 20th Architecture: the Structures that Shaped the Twentieth Century. London, Carlton Books.
Kawamura, Yuniya. The Japanese Revolution in Paris Fashion. Oxford: Berg, 2004.
Neil, Leach. Rethinking Architecture. A Reader in Cultural Theory. Routledge: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 1997.
Quinn, Bradley. The Fashion of Architecture. Oxford: Berg 2003.
Toy, M. Aspects of Minimal Architecture II. London: Academy Editions, 1999.
Umberto, Eco. Functionalism and Sign: The Semiotics of Architecture. The City and the Sign, M. Gottdiener and A. Lagopoulos (eds), New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Valerie Steele. Fashion Italian Style. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.
Wigley, Mark. The Architecture of Deconstruction: Derrida’s Haunt, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1993.
Wigley, Mark. White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1995).
Wilson, Elizabeth. Adorned in Dreams. Fashion and Modernity. London: L.B.Tauris, 2003 (1985).