Rawls and Nozick Theories on the Meaning of Individual - Essay Example

The primary difference between Nozick and Rawls is the legitimacy of the social power of individuals (Paul, Miller, and Paul 164). Rawls's theory acknowledges the role of democracy in a diverse society. He argues that an individual should exercise political power over one another. Rawls's practice of political power should be within the limits of the constitution. The theory of Justice is founded on the belief that individuals are entitled to free and equal rights with respect to principles and ideals that affect them. On the other hand, Nozick is convinced that individuals are entitled to justice based on the social and economic they have in their possession. The practice of political and social power should be within the limits of justice. Nozick's perspective of justice is a critique of Rawls's propositions. Not all members of society benefit from social cooperation.