The paper "New Technologies and Foster Families" is a worthy example of a research proposal on sociology. Foster parenting has been deceased tremendously for the last few years. Foster parents’ retention is a big issue in foster families. Foster parents are neither willing to foster other children or child after the foster period is over though the government has been reimbursing them for the expenses incurred during fostering. The long recruitment and retention process have been identified to be one of the major causes of the decrease in a number of foster parents as foster families take long to respond to the potential carers inquiries which make them lose interest and their willingness to foster children.
This study, therefore, aims at investigating the causes of the decline in foster parenting in Australia especially Sydney. The research will be specifically done at Foster care association foster family and the inferences will also be submitted to the same institution as they will be the major sponsor of the research. Data will be collected through questionnaires which will comprise of open and close-ended questions and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.
After analysis, the data will be inferred and a copy will be sent to the government foster sector to use it in enhancing the effective changes which require being done in foster families in the country. Introduction. Every year the numbers of fostered children have been increasing at a very high rate as the number of foster parenting decreasing at an alarming rate in Australia. The problem facing different nations is what they require doing to with an increased number of foster children as there are inadequate homes to foster them (Barber & Delfabbro, 2004).
Children requiring foster parenting have been placed in children homes and foster cares due to inadequate services. Cause of decreasing in foster parenting has not yet been established (McHugh et al, 2004). Foster care workers have the responsibility of retaining and recruiting foster children who have been impacting different children’ s life. Different researches have been conducted to identify recruitment and fostering of the foster parents whereby, though much has been done there is still continued shortage of foster homes. Since the development of foster parenting technology has not yet been integrated into the foster parenting system.
Poor Technology use has been anticipated to be the major cause of low foster parenting. Technology has been identified to play a major role in impacting the foster parenting system. The technology could be used in recruiting, monitoring, evaluating and reporting cases related to fostering. Little has been done to identify whether technology has an impact on the issue associated with a current reduction on the number of foster parenting in Australia. McHugh (2002) in his research he identified poor use of technology as the major cause of the decline in foster parenting and proposed it as a solution for reducing foster parenting issues.
This triggered the need to identify whether technology has any relationship with the current crisis of foster parenting.
1. Government of Florida (Feb. 2010). Florida Uses Mobile Technology To Enhance Safety Of Children In Foster Care. From http://www.thegovmonitor.com/world_news, on30/05/2012.
2. Keogh, L., & Svensson, U. (1999). Why don’t they become foster carers? A study of people who inquire about foster care. Children Australia, 24(2), 13–19.
3. Lawrence, R. (1994). Recruiting carers for children in substitute care: The challenge of program revision. Australian Social Work, 47(1), 37–42.
4. Layton, R. (2003). Our best investment: A state plan to protect and advance the interests of children. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
5. Pasztor, E. & Wynne, S. (1995). Foster parent retention and recruitment. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
6. Siminski, P., Chalmers, J., & McHugh, M. (2004). Foster carers in New South Wales: Profile and projections based on ABS Census data. Children Australia, 30, 17–24.
7. South Australian Department of Family and Community Services. (1997). Fostering: The future. Adelaide: South Australian Department.
8. Victorian Department of Human Services. (2003). Public parenting: A review of home-based care in Victoria. Melbourne: Author.
9. Barber, J. G., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Children in foster care. London: Taylor and Francis.
10. Denby, R., Rindfleisch, N., & Bean, G. (1999). Predictors of foster parents’ satisfaction and intent to continue to foster. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(3), 287–303.
11. Krysik, J. & Finns, J. (2010). Research for effective social work practice. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
12. Bromfield, L. M., & Osborn, A. (2007). “Getting the big picture”: A synopsis and critique of Australian out-of homecare research. (Child Abuse Prevention Issues No. 26). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies, National Child Protection Clearinghouse. Retrieved 25 May 2007, from http://www.aifs.gov.au/nch/pubs/issues/issues26/issues26.html
13. Gilbertson, R., & Barber, J. G. (2003). Disrupted adolescents in foster care: Their perspective on placement breakdown. Children Australia, 28(4), 25–30.
14. Rhodes, K., Orme, J. & Buehler, C. (2001). A comparison of family foster parents who quit, consider quitting, and decide to continue fostering. The Social Service Review, 75(1), 84–105.
15. Sinclair, I., Gibbs, I. & Wilson, K. (2004). Foster carers: Why they stay and why they leave. London: Jessica