Best Practices for Students with Learning Disability in Inclusive Schools from the US and UK - Theoretical Analysis and Application to Saudi Arabia – Research Proposal Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Best Practices for Students with Learning Disability in Inclusive Schools from the US and UK -   Theoretical Analysis and Application to Saudi Arabia ” is a fascinating example of a research proposal on education. There is an increasing consensus all over the world that all children have the right to be inclusively educated. For the last years it has been evident that most key international statements have been affirming inclusive education principle and the necessity of working towards schools for all- institutions which celebrate everyone, support learning, include everybody and respond to needs of individuals. According to the UN standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities 1993, the United Nations Conventions on The rights of the Child 1989 and the UNESCO’ s statement and framework for action are some of the powerful tools that have struggled to abolish segregated education which has denied children with disabilities the right to mainstream education in addition to reinforcing society’ s discrimination and prejudices against them.

The mentioned documents provide a strong case for inclusion, an aspect that makes inclusive education to be firmly on the national government's agenda. The UK and the US formally support the aforementioned documents.

For instance, in 1994, the UK was one of the 92 nations that endorsed the Salamanca statement as well as ratifying the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1991. Drawing from the fundamental human rights perspective, children with disabilities should not be excluded from ordinary communities and institutions in addition to being segregated on the grounds of their disability. This project will theoretically examine the best practices for students with learning disabilities in inclusive schools in the US and UK and the application of the same to Saudi Arabia. Aims of the project To theoretically analyze policies of inclusive schools in US and UK and apply the same in the educational system of Saudi Arabia Theoretically analyze the teaching of students with disabilities in the US and UK and compare the same with the practices in Saudi Arabia. The significanceThe research is of significance in improving the teaching of students with learning disabilities in Saudi Arabia in line with recommended international/ UN standards adopted by countries such as the US and UK.

Additionally, the work is of significance as no research has been done on comparative educational policies in the UK, US, and Saudi Arabia. The findings are further of significance as they are likely to provide information that may assist Saudi Arabia teachers and policymakers to adopt best practices for children with learning disabilities. Additionally, the study may assist Saudi Arabia minister for education to serve the identified population; children with learning disabilities. Research questions What are the policies of inclusive schools in the UK and the US? To what extent has the US and UK adhered to UNESCO and UN standards on inclusive education policies. What are the educational policies for children with learning disabilities in Saudi Arabia? To what extent has Saudi Arabia adhered to UNESCO and UN standards on inclusive education policies? What are the teaching practices for students with learning disabilities in the US, UK, and Saudi Arabia?    

References

Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer Press.

Ainscow, M. (1997) Towards Inclusive Schooling, British Journal of Special Education,24(1), 3-6.

Au, M. L., & Hui, L. H. (2003). Inclusion or integration for Hong Kong? In M. H. H. Leng, C. R. Dowson & M. G. Mount (Eds.), Inclusive education in the new millennium (pp. 49-57). Hong Kong: Association for Childhood Education International-Hong Kong & Macau and Education Convergence.

Bender, W. N. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: Best practices for general and special educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

CAST. Summary of universal design for learning concepts. Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?i=7

Dyson, A., and Ainscow, M. (2003). Standards and inclusive education: schools squaring the circle, unpublished paper. The University of Manchester, Faculty of Education.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.

Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (2001). Teaching students with learning problems. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Farrell, P. (1997). Teaching Pupils with Learning Difficulties: Strategies and Solutions. London: Cassell.

Fuchs D., & Fuchs L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60(4),294-309.

Kershner, R. (2003). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs. The unpublished briefing paper, University of Cambridge.

Lenz, B. K., Deshler, D. D., & Kissam, B. R. (2004). Teaching content to all: Evidence-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Putnam, J. W. (1998). The process of cooperative learning. In J. W. Putnam (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom (pp. 17-47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., McLaughlin, V. L., & Williams, B. (2000). Collaboration for inclusive education: Developing successful programs. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us