The paper "The Influence of Middle Class on Democracy" is a great example of a politics research paper. Since the dissolution of the monarchical leadership in Thailand in 1932, the country has enjoyed passive democratic leadership due to various occasions of military junta resulting from constant political struggles. In 1977 the adoption of a new constitution marked the beginning of the road to establishing democracy. Unfortunately, the power was grabbed by influential factions leading to the development of the new middle class and the lower class factions. This paper aims to propose a study on how the new middle class influenced the expectations of democracy in the current state of Thailand.
The methodology will explore the collection of qualitative data from existing research materials and interviews followed by a contextual analysis of the collected data using case study procedures. The findings of the study will aid in not only define the position of the new middle class in Thailand but also provide a course of democratic actions. The Influence of Middle Class on Democracy Introduction Thailand is celebrating more than 80 years of democratic leadership following the termination of the total monarchy in 1932.
However, on many occasions, the country experienced unstable forms of government due to military interventions (Englehart, 2003). Regardless of the tumultuous political state, the spirit of establishing democracy remained in the minds of many Thais. That is why in the mid-1980s, the public ideology on democracy characterized by continuous massive bloody demonstrations such as the one experienced in 1992 influenced the consolidation of democracy in Thailand (Englehart, 2003). In this regard, the military Junta at that time receded to pave way for the establishment of a democratic government devoid of political interruptions which have continued to grow up to date.
For instance; the 1977 constitution revised and restructured the framework of Thailand’ s electoral democracy. However, apart from the adopted constitution of 1977, the future of establishing a stable state of democracy in Thailand rests in the hands of the urbanized middle class (new middle class). This implies that despite the unending struggle on amending and implementing a democracy-oriented constitution the future of Thailand’ s political stability relies on the political stratification of the new middle class (Pathmanand, 2001).
The two main courses of the stratification present the possibility of only two options, whereby, the first option prospects on the possibility of the political entrepreneurs indulging in mass protests as a way of expressing their selfish interests. The second option prospects the settling of the middle class for a social compromise as an alternative to safeguard their selfish interests. Either way determines not only the course of democracy but also the expectations of democracy in Thailand (Albritton & Bureekul, 2008). In order to demystify the influence of new middle class on democratic expectations of Thailand, it is important to address the effects of the middle-class frenzies that are driven by fear and anger (Carothers, 2002).
This paper proposes a contextual description of how the new middle class influences the progress of establishing democracy in Thailand. It will achieve this by scrutinizing the background of new middle classes and influence on democracy, outlining the objectives, describing the methodology and identifying the prospected implications of the study.
Albritton, R. B., & Bureekul, T. (2008). Developing democracy under a new constitution in Thailand. How East Asians view democracy, 114-38.
Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of democracy, 13(1), 5-21.
Chatterjee, P. (2008). Democracy and economic transformation in India. Economic and political weekly, 53-62.
Chen, J., & Lu, C. (2011). Democratization and the middle class in China The middle class’s attitudes toward democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 705-719.
Connors, M. K., & Hewison, K. (2008). Introduction: Thailand and the “good coup”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 1-10.
Englehart, N. A. (2003). Democracy and the Thai middle class: Globalization, modernization, and constitutional change. Asian Survey, 43(2), 253-279.
Forsyth, T. (2001). Environmental social movements in Thailand: how important is class?. Asian journal of social science, 29(1), 35-51.
Gainsborough, M. (2002). Political change in Vietnam: In search of the Middle-Class challenge to the state. Asian Survey, 42(5), 694-707.
Gerke, S. (2000). Global lifestyles under local conditions: The new Indonesian middle class. Consumption in Asia: Lifestyles and identities, 135-58.
Hadiz, V. (2003). Reorganizing political power in Indonesia: A reconsideration of so-called'democratic transitions'. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 591-611.
Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo‐Institutionalist Perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697-718.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2009). How development leads to democracy: What we know about modernization. Foreign Affairs, 33-48.
Jayasuriya, K., & Rodan, G. (2007). Beyond hybrid regimes: more participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 773-794.
Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2007). Democracy versus Distinction: A Study of Omnivorousness in Gourmet Food Writing1. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 165-204.
Pathmanand, U. (2001). Globalization and democratic development in Thailand: the new path of the military, private sector, and civil society. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24-42.
Pathmanand, U. (2008). A different coup d'état?. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 124-142.
Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin's populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62-83.
Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. J. (2005). " Business Populism" in Thailand. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 58-72.
Pongsudhirak, T. (2008). Thailand since the coup. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 140-153.
Richards, D. L., Gelleny, R. D., & Sacko, D. H. (2001). Money with a mean streak? Foreign economic penetration and government respect for human rights in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 219-239.
Schaffer, F. C. (2002). Disciplinary reactions: Alienation and the reform of vote buying in the Philippines. In a conference on “Trading Political Rights: The Comparative Politics of Vote Buying”, Cambridge, MA (August 26–27). Online: http://web. mit. edu/CIS/pdf/Schaffer.
Shatkin, G. (2004). Globalization and local leadership: Growth, power and politics in Thailand's Eastern Seaboard. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 11-26.