SEC Charges India Company in $18 Accounting Fraud – Research Paper Example

The paper "SEC Charges India Company in $18 Accounting Fraud " is a wonderful example of a business research paper. The SEC charged Indian company Satyam Computer Services $10 to settle a fraud case against them. The company was listed on both the Indian stock exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. Their business was mainly outsourcing. Between 2005 to 2009 they created over 6,000 phony invoices to doubled their assets on the company's books, reflecting an overall increase in the value of the company. The SEC also fined the company's accountants, Price Waterhouse, $6 million for allowing the fraud to go on without reporting it. In effect, the accountants were complicitous in the scheme. The was recently taken over by the Indian government who also placed criminal charges against its several executives. The moral issue involved here is simply that they were wrong to lie about their assets and the accountants were wrong to knowingly report the soup up numbers. Are there any arguments that could justify such fraud. Was there a greater good the Satyam Computer Services was seeking? One could argue that they had to do what they did to attract investment so that the company could experience further growth and attract new clients. In this possibility, as the new clients were brought on, the phony invoices would be removed until they were all gone. If this argument were allowed then other companies could do the same until there was nothing but a paper empire built in the business world. Another argument would be that the activity represented more the creativity of executives of Satyam Computer then it did their greed. They could have stopped the activity, say, after one or two years and no one would have been the wiser. Virtuous responsibility requires one to make the best decisions possible that are based on temperance and justice. Another view is that it is based on everyone should get what they deserved. Either way, the Satyam Computer company violated both moral tenets and they were certainly trying to get more than they deserved.