The paper "Exploring Issues in Education Curriculum: Education Reforms in Mathematics" is an excellent example of a research paper on education. Education reform efforts tend to focus more on curriculum change and their main objective is to emphasize higher-order thinking skills such as methods of problem-solving and connections to the world outside the classroom. The more traditional curriculum aims on focusing on the acquisition of basic skills and the handling of academic subjects. Currently, the world faces far-reaching socio-economic changes. Most governments focus on producing citizens who are able to respond positively to new environmental changes.
These governments aim at producing citizens who are able to learn new skills at their different levels in life. Most governments invest many of their resources on education as well as a bigger proportion of their budget on education. They see the educational process as a means of producing an intelligent workforce required to operate within this changing environment. We are experiencing a period of expansion and change in most of the public, educational systems throughout the world as governments try to adapt to these challenges.
This is through the implementation of new educational programs that they think that it will be of immense importance to them and to the future of their economy. The change in demand directly presented by the increase in access to education at different levels (Kennedy, 2005). This report will give an overview of the factors associated with the implementation of Queensland Mathematics syllabi such as the nature of and purpose of curriculum reform; the steps required to enact the reforms and the implication of the reforms to teachers and other stakeholders.
It will point out leadership and management theories that describe the issues emerging associated with these reforms. It will also show the roles a person in leadership has to play towards implementing the new curriculum. Introduction Purpose The purpose of the implementation reform assessment is to determine how effective the Queensland mathematics syllabus is integrated into the school’ s curriculum and how the teachers and pupils view the new curriculum. The objectives of the new syllabus are assessed after implementation to identify the effectiveness of the new syllabus. The long term and the short-term effects of the new syllabus need regular evaluation.
This helps to come up with the portions of the sections in the syllabus that need to be critically changed. The response of the students and instructors should also be evaluated. The reform is implemented in the context of the changing environment and the socio-economic well being of the Australian government. Implementation of the reform will take place after a consensus is reached between the reforms directorate and the teachers (Kennedy, Chan & Fok, 2006). The role of the leader in this implementation of the reforms will be to plan for effective means that will help the transition to go smoothly. Scope The assessment will be done to schools from year 1-10 who are using the syllabus.
An average of twenty schools will be visited and an average of one hundred teachers will be required to participate in the questionnaire. The scope of the assessment will be narrowed to the mathematics syllabus.
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/ pãngarau: Best
evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian
schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Council.
Anderson, J. (2005). Implementing problem solving in mathematics classrooms: What
support do teachers want? In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A.
Bruniges, M. (2005). What is driving curriculum reform in Australia? Paper presented at
Curriculum and assessment: Closing the gap, the annual conference of the
Curriculum Corporation Brisbane. Retrieved on 16.05.2011,from
Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2005). 8 forces for leaders of change. Journal of Staff
Development, 26(4), 54–64.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The persistence of presentism. Teachers College
Record, 1-15. Retrieved on 16.05.2011 from
Kennedy, K. J. (2005). Changing schools for changing times: New directions for the school
curriculum in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Kennedy, K. J., Chan, K. S. J. & Fok, P. K. (2006). Theorizing curriculum policy
implementation: the dimensions of “soft” policy and their application to Hong Kong’s
reform agenda. Paper prepared for The Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference, Hong Kong, 28-30 November, 2006.
Kruse, S., & Seashore, L. K. (2007). Developing collective understanding over time:
Reflections on building professional learning community. In L. Stoll & K. Seashore
Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties
(pp. 106-118). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Makar, K. (2007). “Connection levers”: Developing teachers’ expertise with mathematical
inquiry. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research,
essential practice Education Group of Australasia. page 483-495 Sydney.
McDonough, R. P., & Roche, A. (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and
Practice. Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, pages 90-96. Sydney.
Miller, L. (2005). Redefining teachers, reculturing schools: Connections, commitments and
challenges. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), International handbook of educational change:
Extending educational change (Vol. 2, pp. 249-263). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: