Security Analysis and National Defense - Essay Example

Topic: Security Analysis and National Defense Name: xxxxxxxxxx Professor: xxxxxxx Institution: xxxxxx Course: xxxxxxxx Date: xxxxxxxxxx Security Analysis and National Defense 7. If forced to make a choice between the US and China, which side would Australia Choose and why? Introduction Security and national defense are pivotal aspects in any nation; this is because they determine it growth. The growth can be in terms of the economic development, political stability and security or even good social and communal integration. In this section the states involved are china, the US and Australia. These are strong nations that are highly reputable in terms of economic and technological advancement, though Australia needs more development so as to be at par with the rest. In this context the assumption made is that the Australian nation is forced to make a choice between the United States and china; which state it can form allies with. An exploration of the relationship between the US and Australia and then the relationship with China will be done in this section so as to ascertain which nation would be of its choice (Wilborn, 2008). It is worthwhile noting that all aspects have to be considered ranging from the economical issues security and social or communal perspectives of the nations. This is to be done because the issues related to security and national defense are of great importance. For instance a nation that is assured of security from its neighboring state will be highly productive especially in its GDP because of increased number of investors. This could be due to the effect that people are given confidence and assurance of protection political instability and lack of terrorism. The foreign investors will therefore find it pleasant to invest in such peaceful states so that they can maximize their profits. The effect will be the development of the infrastructure and advancements in technology. This has a further implication that the per capita income of the nation will be high and endorse the development in the good living standards of the people. The social relations will also be enhanced and therefore promote peace and understanding which will trace back to the developments in the economy, security and political facets (Bartholomew, 2010). Relationship between China and Australia Australia and China share a variety of interests in various sectors; economical, social and communal and political. The rich and diverse Australia-China relationship has been of greater aid as far as the security and strategic dimensions are concerned. It is noted that China has been welcomed to conduct its business activities in the Australian society; this is because it has been actively involved in the facilitation of regional and global trade. This has been done through the contribution of China in the regional and security prosperity of Australia. China is an international partner that has appreciated the importance of diversity of strong and productive links aimed at promoting its national interests. In the 21st century, pragmatism and cooperation are the main agenda adopted by China; this means that it is more readily in a position to respond to the global challenges in terms of both international peace and security issues (Thomas, 2004). Intimidations such as terrorism and world mass destruction through the use of nuclear weaponry may lead to weak and falling states. It is however, noticeable that these facets do not occur in a single region and cannot therefore be managed singly by a nation. There is need for cooperation and promulgation of various activities in the region under siege so as to facilitate the attainment of peace, security and global security stability. Based on this assertion, it is pivotal note that it therefore calls for unity among the nations so as to facilitate the eradication of fears resulting from terrorism, WMD and general issues of insecurity. This burden ought to be addressed clearly so that the nations can share the task of making it certain that there is prevalence of peace, security and understanding in a region (Turpin, 2002). Cooperation usually leads to the successful solutions between the respective regions- this has an insinuation that building relationships and common objectives can be done collectively and therefore curb the transnational threats. China has been on the fore front of enhancing unity because of its pragmatic and cooperative paradigm to the above stated threats. It has played as a significant role in security and other foreign policy issues which has led to the region’s core security and stability. For instance, China is aware that the deterioration of the Korean peninsular can be a fatal and detrimental to the interests of the whole the region, itself inclusive. As stated previously, China operates on pragmatic and cooperative approaches, and has therefore as a result established talks with the main aim of eradicating the North Korea’s nuclear weaponry. This has an implication that it is practically fighting for the need to have peace to prevail in the region. As a result Australia supports China’s extensive efforts of convening the talks so as to promote peace and attain diplomatic resolution (Thomas, 2004). This is an imperative aspect since the facilitation of the constructive re-engagement with the international community that is done by China through the talks between North Koreans will benefit them. Australia being a neighboring state will also benefit from the same because of the provision of security and stability of northeast Asia. Breakdown in the stability of the region (northeast Asia) will have a devastating effect on the Australian nation. This is in terms of security and economic facets due to the fear of war outbreak from the North Koreans. China is purposely engaged in talks with Australia so as to counter the non-proliferation and then counter the supply of the weapons of mass damage in the region (Thomas, 2004). Australia has plans of strengthening dialogue with China so as to enhance the endorsement of the WMD arms control and the non-proliferation measures. This means that China’s main ambition is not basically meant to facilitate the security and national defense for itself and the neighboring regions alone but also for global benefit. There are strong links between China and Australia and given that China is among the fastest growing nations economically and endowed with political strength, it is possible that its relations with China will lead to developments in Australia. The growth in the economic and political statuses of China has been facilitated by its cooperation with the neighboring regions. Australia being one of the states that is in good rapport with China is also likely to develop politically and economically. This is expected to facilitate future prosperity and maintenance of a stable regional and international environment. The strong inter-dependent relationships between the various countries of a region will automatically benefit all; this will enhance prosperity and strength which will in turn lead to peace and security; just as it is the case between China and the Australian nation (Thomas, 2004). With the bilateral nature of relationship between China and Australia, it has been noted that the largest export market for the Australian products is China surpassing the US. The investment level in Australia by China is over $2.5 billion and therefore has led to the increase in the economic expansion. Bilateral trade has also facilitated the changes in the social perceptions of the two nations. This has also led to the facilitation of tourism between the two nations and therefore good relations between them leading to security, peace and economic development. The fact that trade and investment are featuring between the two nations might be one of the reasons as to why Australia may opt to have good links with the Chinese nation. This however does not mean that it will stop having links with the US. Education and tourism dominate the Australia’s exports to China and therefore accounts for over two thirds of the exports. These links have contributed to good relationships now and for the future through the facilitation and underpinning of the business, cultural and community links (Thomas, 2004). The Affiliation between Australia and the United States There are good links between the US and Australia, this has facilitated the prevalence of substantial commercial links. There are various companies from the Australian state that have their headquarters in the US; this has led to the increase in the economic productivity and relations between the two economies. The relations are basically economic oriented and this has an insinuation that the developments of infrastructure, peace and security will also be effective as there will be an increase in the GDP and the prevalence of peace and unity. The bilateral relationship between the US and Australia is evidenced by the variety of the links and in terms of the social and cultural relations, apart from the common links in economics (Kovalev and Butler, 2004). It is also noted that the Australia’s international airline is fast rebuilding its service to the United States, and this has a mutual benefit to both nations as they earn income and revenue from the same services that are offered to the travelers by the airlines. This means also that the export of the products of whatever case can be done leading to the increase in the investments in the respective nations. This in turn implies that the nation can be in a position to attain economic proficiency leading to improved living standards for their citizens. The other significant aspect that has held the two nations at peace is the fact that thy have almost the same system of governance which is democracy. This means that as they interact, they can be in a position to aid each other in case there are aspects that need political influence or legal enforcements. There is also the information relating to the Australian and US forces that have worked together in the World War I, Korea and Gulf wars. Their influence in the eastern wars have promoted peace just as China has done and therefore leads to the prevalence of peace and developments in the political, economical and social grounds (Kovalev and Butler, 2004). In spite of the commonality that exists between the US and Australian country, there are aspects and facets where there is lack of coordination and coinciding of their strategic issues. For instance in the economic perspectives, mostly the export of the steel products, the tariffs and the subsidies on the American farmers are discussed and decided by the Australian nation in strong economic terms. This has an implication that the reaching of the consensus on such issues may at times lead to misunderstandings and differences. There are also economic restrictions that are set by the US for instance the setting of the quotas on the dairy and meat products. This may result in some disputes and distortion of the global trade in agriculture which may result in Australian farmers (Monfries, 2006). The problems highlighted in this context deter economic growth and integration because of the trade restrictions that have been set up by the nations. There are also notions that the US is on the protectionist mood following its restrictions of the steel imports and this makes the relationship between the two states to be altered leading to differences in opinions over economic and social issues (Kovalev and Butler, 2004). Analysis of the Links between Australia and the US/ China From the assertions presented in the essay, it is clear that there are good links between the three states. However, a critical evaluation of their affiliations indicates that good relations exist between China and Australia as compared to the relationship between Australia and the US. This further implies that the Australian nation will most likely choose China as the best nation to have allies with. The good economic values, social and political relations that exist between China and Australia are a factual reason as to why China may be the choice in case it is forced to choose (Chin & Tow, 2009). The political and security strategic formulations that China has established that enable the Koreans to opt for peaceful relations is what may make Australia to choose China. This is because security in any region plays a significant role in terms of the economic development and social integration. China has been on the forefront of endorsing the prevalence of security and national defense to almost all the nations in the east; Australia inclusive. This has not only facilitate local trade but also led to the global economic growth (Taylor, 2007). There are no incidence of misunderstandings and disputes highlighted in the association that the Chinese nation and Australia has. However, the links between the US and Australia is faced with restrictions on the trading activities through the setting of quotas and tariffs on their products. This means that their relationship is not as strong as the one that exists between Australia and China. This means that there are policy deficits between the US and Australia which can limit the validity of their relationship as far as the political, security and economic issues are concerned. The perception of the Australian people as regards the US and China will definitely indicate that there is a better link between them and China than it is with the United States. They will therefore choose China in case they are given a chance to choose which nation to closely interact with especially in terms of the economic, political and the communal or the social spheres (Porter & Smith, 2010). Conclusion Issues relating to national defense and security are of great importance to any nation; this is because they determine the nation’s economic growth, social integration and political stability. The relationship between China and Australia has shown greater significance as China has established talks with the terrorist states and reduced the insecurity issues. This has facilitated the existence of developments in the GDP, peace and national defense or security. Security and national defense are fundamental aspects in any nation; this is because they determine it growth. The growth can be in terms of the economic development, political stability and security or even good social and communal integration. The analysis shows that China and Australia interacted and therefore attained developments in almost all the contemporary issues that affect human beings; the social or communal, political and economic facets. These are sturdy countries with good public image in terms of economic and technological advancement (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2005). Tourism between the two nations has been enhanced and therefore good relations between them have led to security, peace and economic development. The bilateral relationship between China and Australia has led to an increase in the level of exports for the Australian products are China surpassing the US. Investments level in Australia by China is over $2.5 billion and therefore has led to the increase in commercial growth. Therefore Australia will have to choose China as its major state to relate with as regards the benefits that will accrue to it (Gill, 2010). Bibliography Australian Bureau of Statistics 2005, Year book, Australia, Issue 87, Australia Bureau of Statistics, New Zealand. Bartholomew, C 2010, Report to congress of the U. S. -China economic and security review commission, DIANE Publishing, Washington DC. Brabazon, T 2005, From revolution to revelation: generation X, popular memory, and cultural studies, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, New York. Chin, K. & Tow, W 2009, ASEAN-India-Australia: Towards Closer Engagement in a New Asia. Chicago: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Gill, B 2010, Rising Star: China's New Security Diplomacy G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series, Edition2, London: Brookings Institution Press. Hubbard, C 2005, Australian and US military cooperation: fighting common enemies. New York: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Kang, D 2007, China rising: peace, power, and order in East Asia, Columbia University Press, Columbia. Kovalev, A. A., and Butler, W 2004, Contemporary issues of the law of the sea: modern Russian approaches, Eleven International Publishing, New York. McDowall, R. C 2007, Howard's long march: the strategic depiction of China in Howard government policy 1996-2006, ANU E Press, Sydney, Australia, Monfries, J 2006, Different societies, shared futures: Australia, Indonesia and the region Indonesia update series, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Chicago. Mizukami, T 2007, The sojourner community: Japanese migration and residency in Australia. BRILL Publishers, Sydney, Australia. Porter, E. & Smith, T 2010, China in Oceania: reshaping the Pacific? foundations in Asia Pacific studies FAPS series, Berghahn Books Publishers, London. Sauvant, K. P 2009, Investing in the United States: is the US ready for FDI from China? Edward Elgar Publishing, California. Sheridan, G 2007, The partnership: the inside story of the US-Australian alliance under Bush and Howard. London: UNSW Press. Taylor, B 2007, Australia as an Asia-Pacific Regional power: friendships in flux? Volume 5 of Routledge security in Asia Pacific series, Routledge Publishers, New York. Thomas, N 2004, Re-orienting Australia-China relations: 1972 to the present, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, New York. Turpin, T 2002, Innovation, technology policy and regional development: evidence from China and Australia, Edward Elgar Publishing, California. Wilborn, T. L 2008, Security cooperation with China: analysis and a proposal, DIANE Publishing, Washington DC. Zhu, Z 2010, China's new diplomacy: rationale, strategies and significance, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, New York. Taylor, B 2007, Australia as an Asia-Pacific regional power: friendships in flux? Routledge, Sydney, Australia. Vogel, E., Yuan, M., & Tanaka, A 2002, The golden age of the U.S.-China-Japan triangle, 1972-1989, Harvard University Asia Center,   These are the wrong references that had been used: Jiang, W, 2009, Acquisition of Word Order in Chinese as a Foreign Language Volume 38 of Studies on language acquisition. London: Walter de Gruyter. Beeson, M, 2006, Bush and Asia: America's evolving relations with East Asia Volume 1 of The Routledge series in analytical management Volume 1 of Routledge security in Asia Pacific series Routledge Contemporary Asia Series. New York: Taylor & Francis. Martin, P et al, 2006, Managing migration: the promise of cooperation. New York: Lexington Books. Bartol, K, 2005, Management Foundations: A Pacific Rim Focus. New York: McGraw-Hill. Xiaohu, T 2005, China business guide. Edition3, China Knowledge Press, Chicago. These are the supposed references that should have been used (you forgot to compile them) Bartholomew, C 2010, Report to congress of the U. S. -China economic and security review commission, DIANE Publishing, Washington DC. Turpin, T 2002, Innovation, technology policy and regional development: evidence from China and Australia, Edward Elgar Publishing, California. Wilborn, T. L 2008, Security cooperation with China: analysis and a proposal, DIANE Publishing, Washington DC. Sauvant, K. P 2009, Investing in the United States: is the US ready for FDI from China? Edward Elgar Publishing, California. Read More

Intimidations such as terrorism and world mass destruction through the use of nuclear weaponry may lead to weak and falling states. It is however, noticeable that these facets do not occur in a single region and cannot therefore be managed singly by a nation. There is need for cooperation and promulgation of various activities in the region under siege so as to facilitate the attainment of peace, security and global security stability. Based on this assertion, it is pivotal note that it therefore calls for unity among the nations so as to facilitate the eradication of fears resulting from terrorism, WMD and general issues of insecurity.

This burden ought to be addressed clearly so that the nations can share the task of making it certain that there is prevalence of peace, security and understanding in a region (Turpin, 2002). Cooperation usually leads to the successful solutions between the respective regions- this has an insinuation that building relationships and common objectives can be done collectively and therefore curb the transnational threats. China has been on the fore front of enhancing unity because of its pragmatic and cooperative paradigm to the above stated threats.

It has played as a significant role in security and other foreign policy issues which has led to the region’s core security and stability. For instance, China is aware that the deterioration of the Korean peninsular can be a fatal and detrimental to the interests of the whole the region, itself inclusive. As stated previously, China operates on pragmatic and cooperative approaches, and has therefore as a result established talks with the main aim of eradicating the North Korea’s nuclear weaponry.

This has an implication that it is practically fighting for the need to have peace to prevail in the region. As a result Australia supports China’s extensive efforts of convening the talks so as to promote peace and attain diplomatic resolution (Thomas, 2004). This is an imperative aspect since the facilitation of the constructive re-engagement with the international community that is done by China through the talks between North Koreans will benefit them. Australia being a neighboring state will also benefit from the same because of the provision of security and stability of northeast Asia.

Breakdown in the stability of the region (northeast Asia) will have a devastating effect on the Australian nation. This is in terms of security and economic facets due to the fear of war outbreak from the North Koreans. China is purposely engaged in talks with Australia so as to counter the non-proliferation and then counter the supply of the weapons of mass damage in the region (Thomas, 2004). Australia has plans of strengthening dialogue with China so as to enhance the endorsement of the WMD arms control and the non-proliferation measures.

This means that China’s main ambition is not basically meant to facilitate the security and national defense for itself and the neighboring regions alone but also for global benefit. There are strong links between China and Australia and given that China is among the fastest growing nations economically and endowed with political strength, it is possible that its relations with China will lead to developments in Australia. The growth in the economic and political statuses of China has been facilitated by its cooperation with the neighboring regions.

Australia being one of the states that is in good rapport with China is also likely to develop politically and economically. This is expected to facilitate future prosperity and maintenance of a stable regional and international environment. The strong inter-dependent relationships between the various countries of a region will automatically benefit all; this will enhance prosperity and strength which will in turn lead to peace and security; just as it is the case between China and the Australian nation (Thomas, 2004).

With the bilateral nature of relationship between China and Australia, it has been noted that the largest export market for the Australian products is China surpassing the US.

Read More