StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Anarchy and Power - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This case study "Anarchy and Power" addresses briefly the different connotations of the notion of anarchy in accordance with its relation to realist and liberal international relations theories. It offers a comprehensive study on all the ideas surrounding the political philosophy of anarchy while precisely reviewing the theories of international relations. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Anarchy and Power
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Anarchy and Power"

Anarchy and Power Politics Introduction: The changing panorama in recent international politics has directed world leaders and governments toward the bigger expression of the emergence of an international community. This has further emphasised the primary issues under the studies of international relations amalgamating more global issues. The study of international relations is significant in the sense that it articulates the most important political and socio-economical theories regarding the geo-political relations within states as well as among nations. In this context, the notion of anarchy is important to explain and understand various political philosophies related to international relations. While advocating the absence of states, anarchists support revolution as “a process leading to the total deflation of state authority” (Ehrlich, 1979, p. 13). But how far is anarchy proclaiming about self help system in a state? How is the concept of security being looked after in terms of institutionalising identities and interests of states and nations as described by Wendt (1992)? Above all, it also includes a bigger question about identity formation of international politics. This paper addresses briefly the different connotations of the notion of anarchy in accordance with its relation to realist and liberal international relations theories. The paper offers a comprehensive study on all the ideas surrounding the political philosophy of anarchy while precisely reviewing the theories of international relations in an attempt to provide with a broader picture of world politics. Anarchy: Coming to the theories and notions of international relations, one of the most debated issues is the concept of anarchy and the argumentations it follows. The idea of anarchy can be defined as a socially constructed concept (for example, ‘sovereignty’ and ‘power’) which is, according to Wendt, “what states make of it” (Wendt, 1992, p. 395). Anarchism is concerned with the restraints of world government as argued by neo-realists while neo-liberals see it as a big problem that can be resolved through the creation of strong global institutions (Kegly, 2009). Postmodern international relations theorists are vocal about the ‘traditional or heroic practice’ of international relations that differentiates between sovereignty and anarchy (Sutch, 2001, p. 18). It supports the dichotomy between sovereignty and anarchy arguing that sovereignty is the ideal of order, rationality and homogeneity that is threatened by the latter (that is, anarchy). Nonetheless, it is important to understand the definition of sovereignty in relation to anarchy and vice versa with regard to explaining structural aspects of international politics. With the conceptualisation of international anarchy, the issue of security is of primary concern for world governments. Anarchy is the absence of institutions for global governance, which may direct to the possibilities of global outbreak of war. This is probable as anarchy fails to provide a complete explanation global systems change in terms of determining the levels of war and peace (Kegley, 2009). In terms of realist theories, states operate in a world of ‘anarchy’ without common government, thus defining anarchy as the absence of an external enforcer of agreements (Elman and Elman, 2003, p. 74). Whereas neo-realists argue on the far-reaching negative implications for cooperation in anarchy, much to the opposition of institutional theorists. The latter is in favour of the existence of cooperation within anarchy. As per the neorealist assumption, anarchy is the key ordering principle of international relations along with its positive as well as negative implications. In short, the notion of anarchy has different connotations as determined by states. Some of the interpretations of anarchy can be determined as following: Anarchy as chaos as defined by the first anarchists during English and French Revolutions Anarchy as absence of government Anarchy as a better society without government Anarchy as a global security concern posing as a significant threat to all nations Above all, interpretation of anarchy has significant variations in terms of different theories in international relations, depending on the different relationship between the anarchic environment and human beings (Thompson, 2001). In order to understand these interpretations of anarchy, it is important to go through some of the most discussed theories in international relations that can provide a comprehensive picture of the significance and connotations of anarchy in current context. It is important to note that issues of international relations can be described at best in terms of three most popular theories - realism, liberalism and constructivism. Anarchy and realism: Realism is considered to be the most dominant theory of international relations advocating the notion of an international anarchic system. Realists argue that states are the main actors in international politics. As self-interest and power politics are incorporated with anarchic systems of states, realists identify the concern of security dilemma (Wendt, 1992) leading to greater military instability to the extent of global war as a result of defensive strategies adopted by states. That is to say, realism focuses on power as the dominating force in international anarchic system of world government (Richardson, 2001). In terms of the issue of cooperation, realist theorists argue that there is more of competition among states rather than of cooperation mainly due to the structure of international anarchy without global governance. For instance, the realist assumption argues that cooperation will be rare in terms of arms control or other security issues of common interest (Kegley, 2009). This further encourages distrust among states in an attempt to seek self-advantage and economic primacy over each other. In other words, international anarchy encourages states to practice self-help while emphasising on military strength. This is definitely a potential threat to the issue of international alignments among nations. Another related issue is that of transforming identities and interests of states under anarchic system. As Wendt (1992) explains in his article, realists believe that anarchy encourages developing egoistic identities and interests among states, which is evidently against the notion of a universal identity and interest(s). So realist anarchism propagates the idea of conceptualising identities and interests while concentrating on the issue of power. In other words, the dynamics of anarchy as argued by realists leads to competitive power politics among states (Wendt, 1992). Because anarchy explains that every state should promote its national interest and acquire power (in this sense, military capabilities) to dominate others and compete with them for self-advantage. A significant development of realism can be termed as neo-realism, advanced by Kenneth Waltz (Wendt, 1992) that defines anarchy as the ordering principle of international system. The theory combines an individualist approach to the international system with the materialistic approach of Classical Realists emphasising power and interest (Wendt, 1999). The neo-realists’ take on the issue of cooperation in anarchism states that the reinforcement of cooperation and collective identity formation among states is constrained by the fear of exploitation. In such cases, anarchy is the best systemic principle to describe international relations. Anarchy and liberalism: In terms of shaping state identities and interests, the theory of liberalism is of subsequent importance in international relations. In Richardson’s words, “international liberalism seeks to realise the core liberal values globally, aspiring to a world in which all people enjoy liberal rights and freedoms.” (Richardson, 2001, p. 55) Liberal theorists challenge the realist conception of anarchy arguing that the international anarchic system can be conceptualised as an ordered anarchy even without global governance. This is possible as most states follow commonly acknowledged normative standards (Kegley, 2009). So collective identity and common interests are essential part of liberal anarchism. Unlike the realist conceptualisation of states as a unitary actor in international relations, liberalism advocates plurality in state actions. That is to say, the itineraries of liberalism are not limited to political security concerns of states alone, it also focuses on economic and cultural security issues. Anarchy is definitely there in international relations; but options are there for broader notions of power as well as cooperation. Besides, liberalism distinguishes from that of realism in terms of its emphasis on absolute gains rather than the realist relative gains. One of the most essential features of liberalism is characterised by the concept of interdependence, a situation where the behaviour of international actors affects others associated with them. In other words, interdependence is often used to explain cooperation and cooperative relationships, constituents to develop collective identities and common interests, among states (Wendt, 1992). However, with the process of globalisation doing its rounds, states fear that interdependence will develop a comprising condition for their sovereignty and security (Kegley, 2009, p. 284). With significant changes in international relations, it is strongly assumed that increased interdependence can lead to higher levels of cooperation among states. This assumption has been successfully promoted by neo-liberalists, who argue that cooperation in the form of global institutions can resolve the problems of anarchy. In this context, conceptualisation of cooperation is common in both neo-realism as well as neo-liberalism. While the neo-realists are vocal about the negative implications of cooperation in anarchy, neo-liberalists go for ‘institutionalised cooperation’ (Wendt, 1992; Thompson, 2001). Neo-realists emphasise on relative gains whereas neo-liberalists focus on absolute gains. Security is a primary issue for neo-realists while neo-liberals are more concerned about economic welfare. Thus, neo-liberalism does not deny the anarchic nature of the international system; instead, its argumentations are verified in support of the role of cooperation in institutionalising the anarchic system by means of building norms, regimes and institutions (Kegley, 2009). Conclusion: It is evident now that the concept of the presence of anarchy is accepted by almost all theories in the study of international relations. The presupposition of an anarchic system is thus valid as the international system is leaderless. Therefore, there is no universal sovereign or global governance, no hierarchical superiority of power that can resolve disputes, enforce law and order the system. But that does not encourage us to define anarchy as a world of chaos, disorder or conflict. It simply reflects the order of the international system that comprises of independent states with no central authority controlling them. The recent progress in globalisation has influenced states to emphasise on relevant aspects such as interdependence, cooperation and above all, security issues. Neo-realists as well as liberalists commonly agree over the significance of cooperation in managing international relations. Neo-liberalism further supports the idea of institutionalised cooperation in the international anarchic system. Therefore, it can be summarised that anarchy is the key order in international relations. It does pose a competitive threat among states over security issues as supported by realists. However, there can be cooperative relationships in anarchy with its positive and negative implications (advocated by neo-realists). One of the most important point in international cooperation is to maintain interdependence in a progressive manner (argued by liberalists). The value of interdependence can further advance toward achieving the higher levels of cooperation among states, which is a political, socio-cultural and economic requirement the globalized world needs now. The connotations of power politics are changing to the extent of incorporating states and nations together with the global system, which encourages developing collective identities and common interests. This is happening in accordance with the various interpretations of anarchy in present context. Therefore, it is politically correct to argue that the interpretation of anarchy is what states make of it. References: 1. Ehrlich, H. J., 1979. Reinventing Anarchy: What are Anarchists Thinking These Days? London: Routledge. 1. Elman, C. and Elman, M. F. (eds.), 2003. Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Massachusetts: MIT Press. 1. Kegley, C. J., 2009. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. 1. Richardson, J. L., 2001. Contending Liberalisms in World Politics: Ideology and Power. Colorado: Lynne Rienner. 1. Sutch, P., 2001. Ethics, Justice and International Relations: Constructing an International Community. London: Routledge. 1. Thompson, W. R. (ed.), 2001. Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics. New York: Routledge. 1. Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391-425. 1. Wendt, A., 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Anarchy and Power Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words, n.d.)
Anarchy and Power Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. https://studentshare.org/politics/1731939-alexander-wendt-has-argued-that-anarchy-is-what-states-make-out-of-it-discuss-the-implications-of-this-statement-in-relation-to-realist-and-liberal-international-relations-theory
(Anarchy and Power Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Anarchy and Power Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/politics/1731939-alexander-wendt-has-argued-that-anarchy-is-what-states-make-out-of-it-discuss-the-implications-of-this-statement-in-relation-to-realist-and-liberal-international-relations-theory.
“Anarchy and Power Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1731939-alexander-wendt-has-argued-that-anarchy-is-what-states-make-out-of-it-discuss-the-implications-of-this-statement-in-relation-to-realist-and-liberal-international-relations-theory.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Anarchy and Power

War On Terror by Kenneth Waltz

Kenneth Waltz, such as the nature and behavior of man, an Internal organization of states and the anarchy of the international system.... Harmony in anarchy exists when not only is every state rational but every state assumes that every other state is rational too.... the imperative influence of anarchy is the ‘underlying' or ‘permissive' cause of war....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Structure And Anarchy

In theory and logic it is relatively easy to show that structure and leadership are more effective than anarchy and consensus in getting things done.... In historical experience, however, there is a good argument to be made that movements have made their greatest accomplishments at times when formal leadership and structure have been least important, and anarchy and consensus most prevalent.... These are material incentives (money, goods, and other tangible rewards); specific solidarity incentives (status, power, and other intangible benefits that are scarce); collective solidarity incentives (prestige, friendship, fun, and other rewards from being part of a group); and purposive incentives (value fulfillment, or the sense of satisfaction from contributing to a worthwhile cause)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Federalist Papers: Cohesion Out of Anarchy

“[I]f the State of Rhode Island was separated from the Confederacy and left to itself, the insecurity of rights under the popular form of government within such narrow limits would be displayed by such reiterated oppressions of factious majorities that some power altogether independent of the people would soon be called for by the voice of the very factions whose misrule had proved the necessity of it”.... The “will independent of society”, of course, is the risk of going too far away from the pole of majority power, represented by Rhode Island, and towards a regime more like an authoritarian or monarchic one....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Does totalitarianism rise out of the shadow of Liberty and Democracy

Some believe the founders of government types knew how Liberty (0% government and 100% liberty) could span into anarchy and consequently into Totalitarianism (100% government and 0% liberty).... Once in power, the larger group can then disrupt the original system for one that would only allow it to stay in power.... It is needless to mention that “… allow it to stay in power....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Neorealism and Complexity Theory and Their Different Notions of the Term System

According to neorealism, anarchy and distribution of capabilities are the ordering principles that define the international structure (Mearsheimer 2001).... There is a unipolar system which only has one great power, then the bipolar system with two great powers.... The paper shows the different perceptions of the term system by the two theories....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Forms and Theories of Government

monarchy is a form of government where there is a king or a queen who at times has absolute power.... power is transferred along through the family.... dictatorship is a form of government which is autocratic and involves a single leader who is not an elected representative and often uses force to keep power.... Tyranny is similar concept where the all power is vested in one single ruler who is often harsh, unjust and oppressive....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Democratic Peace Hypothesis and Realist Theory

Waltz points out that “Morgenthau…thought of the “rational” statesmen as ever striving to accumulate more and more power.... He viewed power as an end in itself”1.... The concept of the evil nature of those who try to grasp power is disputed by Morgenthau with this stance, and it questions the democratic peace theory's hypothesis that the rational aspects of democratic governments make war among them impossible....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Tyranny Of Majority

This paper ''The Tyranny Of Majority'' discusses the majority's tyranny, where the majority make the laws to enrich and strengthen themselves and oppress the weak and power.... The inheritance was from generation to generation; people used force, and the property was their power source.... This trade opened doors to power.... But the majority of people have power both physically and morally.... For Tocqueville, townships were an important check against integrating the power in state government, which he considered too distant from individual citizens' concerns and had no business interfering with the genuinely local affairs....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us