StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper 'Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism' tells that there are certain events in life that an individual needs to decide what the right thing to do is. For most people, they tend to listen to their conscience as their guide. Some situations call for making tough decisions…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism"

Philosophy Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism There are certain events in life that an individual needs to decide what the right thing to do is. For most people, they tend to listen to their conscience as their guide. Some situations call for making tough decisions wherein both options seem to be the right thing to choose. This is where the purposes of morality can be an individual’s guide in making the correct decision. The three of the purposes of morality as mentioned by Pojman and Fieser in the book entitled, Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong, are to promote human flourishing, to improve human suffering and to resolve conflicts of interest justly. One type of consequentialist ethics is Utilitarianism, which aims to meet the said purposes of morality. Utilitarianism is a universal and dominant version of teleological ethics which calls for the maximization of goodness in society—that is, the greatest goodness for the greatest number—and not merely the good of the agent (Pojman & Fieser 102). Classic Utilitarianism One of the earliest examples of utilitarian reasoning as cited by Pojman and Fieser is found in Sophocles’ Antigone where King Creon was faced with a tragic task of sacrificing his beloved niece named Antigone, who has violated the law by performing funeral rites over her brother, Polynices (102). In this situation, King Creon believed that it is necessary to sacrifice one person rather than expose his society to the dangers of rebelliousness regardless of the person’s innocence or social standing (Pojman & Fieser 102). As a formal ethical theory, the foundation of utilitarianism was built on by the Greek philosopher Epicurus, who said that pleasure is the goal that nature has ordained for individuals; it is also the standard by which people judge everything as good (Pojman & Fieser 103). This view explains that rightness and wrongness are determined by pleasure or pain that something produces. With this theory, many other philosophers were inspired to focus on the notion of general happiness which stresses that the happiness of the majority must be considered over individual happiness. An example of this is the theory of Francis Hutcheson which stated that the action that is best is the action that produces the greatest happiness of the greatest numbers (Pojman & Fieser 103). David Hume was the one who introduced the term utility to describe the pleasing consequences of actions as they affect people (Pojman & Fieser 103). The classical expressions of utilitarianism are discussed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. According to Jeremy Bentham, there are two main features of utilitarianism and these are the consequentialist principle and the utility principle. The consequentialist principle states that the rightness or wrongness of an act is determined by the goodness or badness of the results that flow from it; it is the end, not the means that counts, the end then justifies the means (Pojman & Fieser 103). On the other hand, the utility or hedonist principle states that the only thing that is good in itself is some specific type of state like pleasure, happiness and welfare; it views pleasure as the sole good and pain as the only evil (Pojman & Fieser 103). Act-and-Rule Utilitarianism According to Act-Utilitarianism, an act is right if and only if it results in as much good as any available alternative (Pojman & Fieser 103). Act utilitarianism states that, when faced with a choice, individuals must first consider the possible outcomes of potential actions and, from that, choose to do what they believe will give them the most pleasure. On the other hand, the Rule-Utilitarianism stated that an act is right if and only if it is required by a rule that is itself a member of a set of rules whose acceptance would lead to greater utility for society than any available alternative (Pojman & Fieser 103). This asserts that the best chance of maximizing utility is by following the set of rules most likely to give us our desired results and because morality is a social and public institution, individuals need to coordinate our actions with others so that they can have reliable expectations about other people’s behavior (Pojman & Fieser 103). The rule utilitarian begins by looking at possible rules of action. To know whether a rule should be obeyed, the outcome of constantly following that certain rule is considered. If continuous observance of the rule produces more happiness than otherwise, that said rule must then be obeyed at all times. The variation between act and rule utilitarianism is therefore based on a difference about the proper object of consequential calculation—specific to a case or generalized to rules and also to achieve the greater good for the greater number of people. Rule utilitarianism has been disapproved for supporting general rules that, in some particular situations, obviously decrease happiness if obeyed. Never to kill another human being may seem to be a noble principle, but it could make self-defense against mean aggressors very difficult. Rule utilitarians mentioned, however, that there are general exception rules that allow the breaking of other rules if such rule-breaking increases happiness, one example is self-defense. Critics argue that this reduces rule utilitarianism to act utilitarianism and makes rules pointless. Rule utilitarians gave emphasis that rules in the legal system like laws that regulate such situations are not pointless. Self-defense is legally defended, while murder is not. However, within rule utilitarianism there is a difference between the sternness and totalitarianism of this specific branch of utilitarianism. Strong Rule Utilitarianism is an unqualified theory, which encloses firm rules that apply for all people and all the time and may never be broken. On the contrary, Weak Rule utilitarianism, which says that although rules should be based on previous examples that benefit society, it is possible, under particular situations, to do what provides the greatest happiness and to not follow that rule. Conclusion Morality aims to achieve what will be good for the human persons. First, it encourages human success like with utilitarianism; it aims to promote what is good for human society. However, utilitarianism does not focus on what would give success to the human person as an individual. If a certain thing would give success to the person but the society would not benefit from it, utilitarians believe that this should not be followed. Morality also aims to decrease human suffering. Utilitarianism fulfills this again as a whole by saying that whatever will cause harm to the human society as a whole should be disregarded or should be removed. For example, if building a factory in a specific place would cause harm to the health of a community in general then the plan of building a factory must not be continued. However, it fails to attend to what would benefit the person as an individual. For example, as mentioned previously, if someone breaks a rule for a good reason and if most individuals of the society strictly follow the classic version of utilitarianism, that one person who violated a particular rule even because he believes it is the right thing to do and in fact, it is indeed the right thing would be condemned by the majority for not strictly following the beliefs and ways of their community. Lastly, morality aims to resolve conflicts of interest justly. In some aspects of utilitarianism, this purpose of morality is fulfilled like in the case of a modified Rule-Utilitarianism. It is a rule to never kill a human being but if killing someone was because an individual had to defend himself then it can be allowed for that event and that person who committed that might not be condemned. Here it is clear that the conflict of strict observance of the rule of not killing any human being and the justified reason why an individual had to do it was settled fairly. Utilitarianism therefore, is able to fulfill the goals of morality in certain aspects in the sense that its founding principle of achieving the common good is beneficial however, it still needs modification for it failed to uphold the entire essence of morality for it aims to achieve happiness whatever means possible even if it would mean hurting someone along the way. Works Cited: Pojman, Louis P. and James Fieser. Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. Boston, USA: Cengage Learning, 2011. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1760926-see-suggested-paper-topics-and-choose
(Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1760926-see-suggested-paper-topics-and-choose.
“Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1760926-see-suggested-paper-topics-and-choose.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Uncovering the Principles of Morality through Utilitarianism

Moral Ethics and Moral Standards

The subject of morality is thus very confusing and always leads to ethical dilemmas.... According to normative ethical theory such as utilitarianism, it is assumed that the right act is always the one that results in the greatest possible happiness (PHL 275 Week Six p.... ) or according to Professor Moore's ideal utilitarianism “actions productive of more good than could have been produced by any other action open to the agent” (Ross 16)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Greatest Principle - Utilitarianism

He has discussed the famous Dudley case where murder and cannibalism were justified under utilitarianism.... Bentham's utilitarianism are discussed and juxtaposed against Mill's philosophy of freedom and liberty.... Aggregate utility and maximized happiness are major points of Bentham's utilitarianism.... Sandel asserts that Bentham's utilitarianism has basic two flaws when translated within the broader social context: it fails to safeguard individual's rights and there cannot be common solution to every person's preferences or problems....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Utilitarian Opinion Over Homosexuality

The fact that this population is affected by existence or publicity of the sexual orientation also raises ethical concerns such as ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence.... utilitarianism is an ethical theory that advocates for the good of members of the society.... … The doctrine of utilitarianism rest on the worldview of maximizing benefits for all members of the society.... Week 4 paper assignment utilitarianism is an ethical theory that advocates for the good of members of the society....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Utilitarianism

The creation of morality does not respect personal opinion (West Par5).... The creation of morality does not respect personal opinion (West Par5).... utilitarianism.... The morality of our decision making and actions is determined by the perception on morality in the majority of people.... The decision may be against the morality of the society but it may be good to the girl.... From this argument, one may be of the assumption that the pleasure and wants of the majority may determine the morality of ones actions....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Utilitarianism

According to the school of thought established by Immanuel Kant ,believes that our sense of morality is connected to reason, therefore according school of thought letting the individual face torture is worth if it saves many lives.... utilitarianism utilitarianism Terrorists are a broad array of political organisations that practise terrorism to further their objectives.... According to utilitarianism, the good of others should come first....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

Why Bernard Williams Argues That Utilitarianism Is Wrong

The paper "Why Bernard Williams Argues That utilitarianism Is Wrong" states that utilitarianism would approve to meeting the demands or implementing actions such as attacks that would risk the hostages' lives in the process, because of the strong attached negative responsibility of the commander.... utilitarianism hence entails consequentialism, which lays emphasis on the outcome of the available choices; as a result, an action is right if it delivers the best result of all given alternatives....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Rule Utilitarianism According to Mill

The principle of utility which forms the cornerstone of utilitarianism states that the degree to which an act increases people's happiness is the measure of morality.... The principle of utility which forms the cornerstone of utilitarianism states that the degree to which an act increases people's happiness, or minimizes their pain, is the measure of morality, and such does not involve the motives or intentions of the agent.... … The paper "Rule utilitarianism According to Mill" is a wonderful example of an assignment on philosophy....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Consequentiality Views of Morality

The paper "Consequentiality Views of morality" highlights that virtue ethics can be described as the classification within normative ethics that tries to determine as well as classify what might be considered of moral character, and to put the moral character into the application.... The two major consequentiality views of morality; ethical egoism and utilitarianism, both concur that human beings are supposed to act in ways that result in good consequences....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us