StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Philosophy: Animal Rights - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Author Tutor Course Date Animal Rights Introduction Animals have made contribution immensely in the human society since the beginning of civilization. In early days, animals were hunted for food, and their bones used to make tools where as their skins could be used for clothing and shelter…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Philosophy: Animal Rights
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophy: Animal Rights"

Download file to see previous pages

This paper seeks to defend animal rights against Cohen’s argument that animals have absolutely no rights. Cohen puts forth the argument that animals have absolutely no rights. According to Cohen, to have a right one must be able to make moral demands and be part of a moral community. Only humans have the capability to perceive the moral consequences of their actions, and are reasonably aware of what the effects are to animals or other human beings. He bases his argument from this perspective citing their nature that they lack the capacity to judge moral situations like human beings do.

This argument does not stand since animals are entitled to rights preventing them from abuse and immoral experimentation. It is worthwhile to note that human duty to take care of animals entails responsible exploitation of all species, which he is bound to by the obligations we have to animals. Humans are obligated to treat animals with respect based on a moral position of utilitarianism. Animal liberation is absolutely a matter of the principle of equality since animals too have interests. The interests of animals should be given equal consideration to human interests.

Concerning this, Cohen’s argument only human beings are entitled to rights is not defensible since animals have the right to be free from harm. Animals too have essential rights although, not as equally detailed, compared to human rights since there is a difference between obligations and rights, obligation being what we ought to do and rights being what others can demand from us. Cohen’s argument is not right, because animals deserve to live according to their nature and they should be free from exploitation, harm or abuse except when for the animal’s good.

The capability of humans to know moral implication of their action does not mean to treat other species in an abusive manner. In his own perspective, Cohen, human duties to animals are of lower order; this is wrong because we have an obligation to take care of the animals the same way we do to fellow humans. The human knowledge of the moral implication of whatever they involve in should be a guide in caring for animals, For instance, by vaccinating them, taking them for a walk, feeding them and general care of animals.

It is not right to inflict pain to animals for the purposes of deriving satisfaction. Humans are also animals and therefore, should treat the animals with respect (Regan 34). In addition, it is not right to use discriminatory terms such as species to treat human and animals differently. Cohen uses the term obligation to bring a different meaning to rights and duties, this is wrong because it is human duty to ensure the animals are healthy and are free from disasters such as hunger and diseases.

Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher, bases his argument on utilitarianism which says that actions should purely be judged on their consequences. He argues that our moral concern should not make animals suffer. In his view, we should treat animals as if they are possessions. We should only use them to benefit us, but hurting them is morally unjustifiable. In addition, he argues all animals are equal including the human and believes that human beings should not harm animals in any way. In fact, human beings should protect and ensure the well-being of animals.

Singer opposes Cohen stand that animals have no rights and shows this in his work by advocating for better treatment of animals. He insists animals’

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy: Animal Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436056-choose-one-of-the-five-topics
(Philosophy: Animal Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436056-choose-one-of-the-five-topics.
“Philosophy: Animal Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1436056-choose-one-of-the-five-topics.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy: Animal Rights

An Argument about Animal Right

So, are vegetarians justified when they underpin the necessity of respect to animal rights?... Author's Name 05/12/2012 An Argument about Animal Right The issue of animals' rights has attracted quite a large number of views and concerns.... Above all, the study seeks to confirm whether animals have their distinct rights as some authors claim.... Unlike Walker's (2004) deep conviction that killing and eating animals is predatory, and too, that it is concrete obstruction of animals' rights of being, Fraser (2000) portrays that to her, avoiding meat and meat products was self betrayal....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Ethical Issues Involved in Animal Testing

nbsp;To refute Regan's assertions that animals have rights, philosophers and researchers, such as Carl Cohen.... The current discourse “Ethical Issues Involved in animal Testing” would be presented by initially presenting the arguments which state that animal testing is unethical, even if the testing helps save human lives.... It would discuss contentions that view animal testing as ethical.... hellip; The author states that an argument that contests animal testing is the moral status animals....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Rights of the Non-human Animals

It is true that all breathing animals have morale rights like human beings.... Therefore, it can be stated that non-human animals also have the basic rights similar to the human beings.... The non-human animals have the fundamental rights to live like the human beings.... In terms of fundamental rights of non-human animals and moral ethics, it can be stated that killing or torturing of animals should be stopped as it can hamper the ecological balance....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Attitudes Toward Animal Research Among Psychology Students

he issues regarding animal rights are just one aspect of respect for all the living organisms of Mother Earth.... 2Peter Singer, a prominent animal rights activist has argued that"If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration.... Until we extend our circle of compassion to all living things, humanity will not find peace. … This essay discusses the rights of animals in the modern times....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Philosophy - Kant Treatment of animals, Utilitarianism Vegetarianism

From the paper "philosophy - Kant Treatment of animals, Utilitarianism Vegetarianism" it is clear that Kant claims kindness to animals as the part of moral ethics, though he never views that humans are bound to pay their duties towards the animals in the same way as they pay towards the humans.... Hence, if Kantian philosophy is considered in its true prospect, it becomes crystal clear that the renowned philosopher lays stress upon the same moral values adopted by an overwhelming majority of the individuals belonging to various cultures and societies of the world....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Utilitarianism on Animal Rights

Now this seems too John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism on animal rights The fact remains that “we eat animals everyday, [and that] Tyson, the largest meat processor in the country, slaughters 222,000 heads of cattle a week, the equivalent of 1,321 an hour, seven days a week” (Lappe).... This is the reason why there are so many animal rights activists.... The basis for animal rights therefore rests upon the idea that animals, just like humans, deserve to be treated humanely....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer

owever, the problem with Singer's opinion is that in his effort to protect animal rights, he forgot the fact that humans too are animals with the right to protect their own interests like all other animals do.... According to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and… He says that when a ‘reservoir' is constructed, though people express concern that it would drown a valley teeming with wildlife, the reason behind this concern often lies in the fact that the valley has Aditya Santoso Philosophy – Ethics – Sara Rettus 2/6 ‘The Place of Nonhumans in Environmental Issues” In the article ‘The place of nonhumans in environmental issues', Peter Singer opines that humans do not treat nonhuman beings equally though they evidently have the right to be treated equally....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Ethical Exploration of Animal Rights

Therefore, though animals have the rights to live a pain-free life, such rights can be repealed for the sake of the humanity's betterment.... Moreover, any ethical perspective on animal-rights must include human's interest in animal.... There is always a group of scholars and common people who are dead against the animal test.... On the other hand, considerate people opine that animals can… Some of those who are against animal-testing argue that those animals which possess consciousness and a certain level of rational capability should have the right Another group argues that the criterion of having rationality and consciousness should not be the sole basis against animal-testing; rather the fact that every animal suffers from pain is strong enough to ban animal-testing....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us