StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name Class Teacher Date Comparison of the scientific philosophies of Kuhn, Duhem and Lauden Thomas Kuhn, Pierre Duhem, and Larry Lauden each contributed valuable information regarding the philosophy of science and the issues which beleaguer it. Foremost for all of them was the question: How can scientific process be more accurate?…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden"

Download file to see previous pages

Therefore, his philosophy will be examined first. Duhem posits that “hypotheses are not straightforwardly refuted by experiment and that there are no crucial experiments in science.” (Wikipedia, 10/19/11) This means that a hypothesis cannot be directly disproved by being part of an experiment. There are several possible reasons which support this theory. First, Duhem works on the presumption that experiments are conducted by humans, who are fallible. Therefore, the results they produce will not be perfect.

This means that experiments in science are inherently flawed, which devalues the results of said experiments. Duhem would go on to set the stage for the theories of Kuhn and Lauden, because Duhem presents the idea that hypothesis, experiment, and fact are not inextricably linked. Kuhn and Lauden dig deeper to consider the reasons why. Thomas Kuhn makes the point that “science has included bodies of belief quite incompatible with the ones we hold today.” (Kuhn, 238) The premise here is that one generation’s science is another generation’s bunk.

Certainly, history is full of examples of past beliefs which have fallen out of fashion with the advent of scientific knowledge and the technology which helps to uncover it. For example, scientific beliefs since the time of the Egyptians have changed irrevocably over the centuries, but Kuhn’s point is that at the time those discoveries were made, they were the newest (and therefore most valid) sources of scientific information. Kuhn further posits that what scientists and scientific historians should be concerning themselves with is to “ask new sorts of questions and to trace different, and often less than cumulative, developmental lines for the sciences.

Rather than seeking the permanent contributions of an older science to our present vantage, they [should] attempt to display the historical integrity of that science in its own time.” (Kuhn, 238) By contrast, Larry Laudan challenges us to re-consider the entire purpose of science. He believes it is “to ask…whether science through time brings us closer to achieving our cognitive aims or goals.” (Laudan, 145) Does scientific knowledge bring us closer to those? Laudan presents a valuable point, which is that “principals of testing, comparison, and evaluation of theories seem to vary significantly from level to level.

” (Laudan, 144) This seems to say that there are a number of variables present which cannot be reconciled from level to level or from scientist to scientist. These variables can manifest themselves as simply as the fact that all people interpret results slightly differently. Take, for example, a doctor who views a patient’s X-ray on which there is evidence of carcinoma. A general practitioner would have a different interpretation of this than would a pulmonary specialist. They both see cancer, but only the pulmonary physician can properly assess which treatments would be most appropriate in attempting to eradicate the cancer.

Now, suppose the patient can only afford to see his general practitioner because that is all his insurance will pay for – he never gets to see the lung specialist, and is relying entirely on the scientific opinion of only one scientist to assess his chances of survival. This is only one example of the flaw in scientific method: suppose the pulmonary physician was more well-read on the latest techniques of eradicating lung carcinoma, and the general

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden Essay”, n.d.)
Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1434123-philosophy-of-science
(Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden Essay)
Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1434123-philosophy-of-science.
“Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1434123-philosophy-of-science.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Comparison of the Scientific Philosophies of Kuhn, Duhen and Lauden

The Circle of Intellectuals Kuhns Concept of Paradigms

For Popper criticism is a necessary aspect for the scientific method of objectivity.... He strongly believes that dogma is an essential part of mature science as the scientific paradigm is an open-ended achievement.... kuhn has the opposite opinion.... kuhn differentiated science and non-science through paradigms.... Thus kuhn talks about infantile science without a dominant paradigm and a normal science or matured science with a dominant paradigm....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Comparison of Quality Philosophies

This focus paper will compare the quality philosophies of W.... comparison of Quality Philosophies Date comparison of Quality Philosophies Introduction Modern management environment is faced with numerous challenges and expectations due to increased competition, competition, customers' and shareholders' expectations and rapid technological advancements (Rose, 2005).... There are various quality philosophies that have been developed by various individuals and institutions (Hoyer and Hoyer, 2001)....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Cartesian Revolution and Revolutionary Science

This importance was previously lacking in the empirical tradition since Kuhn's ideas came to link… Of course there have been those thinkers who refute the views taken by Kuhn but on a deeper examination as well as through the support of those who accept his views, it can be shown that the Cartesian revolution had The essence of kuhn's ideas when it comes to a scientific revolution is a paradigm shift which causes fundamental changes in the way science is approached by the scientists of the time....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Modern Economy and its Operations: A Critique of Today's Practices

In the world today, where progress and success are measured in terms of both personal and public economic growth as well as of other related aspects, one may wonder why we have developed these notions and principles in the first place.... As compared to the times when the tricks of… the trade are simpler, modern situations dictate complexities that only now we fully understood resulting from acquired knowledge in the past as well as of learned principles introduced to us by various philosophers. In this paper, I would like to elaborate more and examine e complexities that most people tend to consider irrelevant but I believe mostly significant in order to fully comprehend the standards of the era we are living right in....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Philosophies of Plato and Aristotle

The last part will conclude this paper by stating the relevance of each of their views in the subsequent studies on the philosophy of the mind—how their analyses guided various schools of thought pertaining to metaphysica and the mind-body problem (philosophies of St.... This paper aims to examine Plato's and Aristotle's views on the philosophy of the mind—specifically, what the terms 'form' and 'substance' mean to each of them and how these are acccessed by humans....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Thoughts About Empirical Methods by Many Philosophers Worldwide

As with kuhn too, scientific data, theories, methods, and results are necessary to characterize empirical methods.... Popper, kuhn, and Quine are in agreement as to the methods used.... To Khun, scientific data needs to be applied to the empirical data to see the assumptions if they are non-naturalistic (Quine, 2012).... Its aim is not to save the lives of untenable systems but to select the one which is, by comparison, the fittest, by exposing them all to the fiercest struggle for survival....
1 Pages (250 words) Admission/Application Essay

Philosophy of Science and the Notions of Scientific Progress Found in Popper and Kuhn

On the basis of the two philosophers' respective philosophies of science, this paper seeks to prove that the approaches of Popper and Kuhn allow us to view that science indeed progresses.... This paper analyses the work Falsificationism of Sir Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn's: work  “Paradigms”, and the scientific progress in them.... This coursework describes the philosophy of science and the notions of scientific progress found in Popper and kuhn....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Philosophy and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions

The author of this paper "Philosophy and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions" examines the scientific revolution process, the sole scientific method, and scientific theories, the main modern philosopher's thoughts on scientific approaches, issues in the field of science that require values....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us