Ethical Conflicts in Good Hunting Movie 1997 – Movie Review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Ethical Conflicts in Good Hunting Movie 1997" is a wonderful example of a movie review on social science. People's ethics are in the form of principles that help differentiate between right and wrong conduct. Ethical and legal issues will always arise whenever there are uncertainties, about the right thing to be done in any given situation. Unsolved ethical issues become dilemmas whenever there is confusion on choosing between two or more actions to undertake (Elder & Linda, 2006). Ethical conflicts will always arise when values and ethics are in contradiction to one another and individuals can experience ethical conflicts and feelings of being lost due to an incompatibility in values regarding a choice.

Ethical conflicts can arise from individuals who seem to have opposing ideas and values (Heilbroner, 2010). Goodwill hunting is a 1997 drama movie about the story of a young man, Will. Will is a geek who has photographic memory abilities and a troubled past which he finds hard to let go. While working at MIT as a laborer Will solves a mathematical question that the undergraduate students deemed difficult to answer.

Professor Lambeau helps get Will out of jail and sets up psychotherapy classes for him. Will, on the other hand, is a loner and doesn’ t get along with people apart from his three friends and due to his troubled past, he does not seem to trust anybody. With the help of Dr. Sean, he will overcome his past and goes on to develop a relationship with Skylar and eventually opens up. (Good Will Hunting, 1997). Ethical dilemma This movie presents an ethical dilemma of self-disclosure and an unnatural relationship with a patient.

In the film, there is a scenario where Dr. Sean finds it difficult to make Will open up and in order to get him to talk he has to spend a lot of time with Will. Disclosing of personal information to a patient amount to crossing boundaries and violating the code of ethics prescribed for psychotherapists. Although disclosing his personal information to Will helped in having Will open up about his past it amounted to a violation of ethics. Psychotherapist and most health professionals are required to conduct themselves professionally, and any form of behavior that is rather personal than professional is prohibited.

Self- disclosure, although being an ethics issue, it causes a dilemma in that, most psychotherapists were not able to take Will in for psychotherapy classes. An indication that they didn’ t have the patience to try and understand him and why he behaved so. Ethically Dr. Sean was wrong to tell Will his personal information regarding his past life but at the end of it, all Will was able to trust Sean and open up.

Therefore, Dr. Sean had no option other than to make Will see the importance of opening up and sharing. Social, legal, ethical and professional issues On the other hand, this movie presents a number of social, legal and ethical issues. Socially Will is depicted as a traumatized teenager who has trust issues, and he could hardly get along with anyone apart from his three friends. After realizing that Will was concealing some vital information while on therapeutical counseling. Dr. Sean decided to disclose his personal information so as to enlighten Will on the importance of opening up.

Legal issues depicted in the movie range from professor Lambeau violating Will’ s confidentiality when he decided to share Will’ s problems with Dr. Sean thus, violating Will’ s confidentiality. Despite having Will released from jail so as to help him, legally he violated will’ s right to confidentiality and privileged communications. Professor Lambeau had to share Will’ s problems in order for him to be released. Through privileged communications, one can develop relation and exchange information freely but Dr. Sean shared information with professor Lambeau and that was legally wrong.

Any information between a patient and psychotherapist should be confidential and in this case, the information was meant to be shared between him and Will.


Annegret, James Ogloff, and Alan Rothschild (2009) mental Health Professionals' confidentiality: a guide to ethical & legal principles. Monash University.

Bernstein, V., & Hartsell, T. (2000). The portable ethicist for mental health professionals. New York: Wiley.

Freegard, H., & Isted, L. (2012). Ethical practice for health professions, 2nd Ed. Melbourne, Australia: Thompson Learning.

Joanna Gylnn and David Gomez (2012).Regulation of Healthcare Professionals: law principles and practices, Sweet and Maxwell.

Kidder, Lobaton (2003).How Good People Make Tough Choices Rev Ed: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. New York: Harper Collins.

Nightingale, David & Cromby, John (1999). Social Constructionist Psychology: An Analysis of Theory and Practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Paul, Elder, Linda (2006). The Guide to Understanding the Foundations of Ethical Reasoning.Foundation for Critical Thinking Free Press.United States

Robert Heilbroner (2010). A social ethics approach to social problems 21st-century capitalism retrieved on 27 November 2014

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us