StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Charles Murrays Claims Concerning Britains Underclass - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Charles Murrays Claims Concerning Britains Underclass" it is clear that Murray (1990) believes that the underclass has a negative impact on the moral fabric of the society and that they are responsible for the occurrences of anti-social behavior in the society…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Charles Murrays Claims Concerning Britains Underclass
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Charles Murrays Claims Concerning Britains Underclass"

Criminology Introduction The concept under has several connections to social exclusion, which is theidea of a cycle of deficiency and cultural theories. Additionally, this concept has been used in the description of the resultant negative impacts on the more vulnerable people. This phenomenon has therefore deepened the debate concerning the competence of universal policies on social protection and stimulated the growing distress concerning fairness in distribution of income patterns and employment (Dwyer, 2010). This essay will cross-examine Charles Murrays claims concerning Britain’s underclass. Generally, Murray (1990) believes that the underclass has a negative impact on the moral fabric of the society and that they are responsible for the occurrences of anti-social behavior in the society. He actually believes in left realism: he ignores the possibilities that crime could also come as a result of political and ideological factors. Therefore, he considers the underclass individuals as criminal minds and as people defined by their deplorable behavior in reaction to their situation but not their situation. Murray (1990) primarily insists that illegitimacy is to be blamed for the deplorable behaviors. For instance, he comments that women under the low class have a higher probability of giving birth to illegitimate children. He asserts that these illegitimate children easily "run wild" since they do not have father role-models. Further, Murray (2001) affirms the responsibility of the underclass unwillingness to work to the rising crime and the break-down of the community life. Again, Murray emphasizes so much on left realism such that he overlooks the possibilities of crimes being caused by the powerful in the society: he believes only the poor are to be blamed. Critics however claim that Murray’s conclusions have no evidence and are baseless. For instance, Alan Walker asserts that Murrays concepts are founded on innuendos, anecdotes, and assertions. Additionally, a research done by John Ermish about single mothers, in the 1980s, established that most women never stay put as single parents. Walker further comments that individuals in the underclass apparently desire stable relationships and jobs (Biressi & Nunn, 2013). Additionally, Anita and Heather (2013) comment that single mothers who divorced in reality take averagely longer time to claim on benefits than single mothers who have never been married. Certainly, Murray’s critics are right realist thinkers; they believe that crime does not only result from the poor but from every group in the society and from other factors such as polities. This is the best ideology that can be used in tackling crimes just like in the case of New York in the 1980s. Despite the criticisms, Murray still proves accounts about the underclass through focusing on the pathological individual. He still believes that when one is poor and do not have a job then it is their mistake. He implies that the attitudes and behavior of the underclass population cuts off the underclass from the normal society (Pickard, 2014). Generally, Murray is a firm advocate for this ideology and argues that the welfare reliance has resulted to a counter-cultural outlook that there exists no obligation to work when an individual can instead obtain benefits from the state or instead commit crime. However, the opposing position proposes that if an economy lacks full employment, then the resulting effect is the unemployed and eventually poverty (McCoy & Peddle, 2012). In this case, it is the structure that has failed and not the individual. Therefore, the individual cannot be held responsible for the surfacing of the underclass. Additionally, Lee and Turner (2014) assert that the emphasis of the phrase ‘underclass,’ since the 80s, has shifted. This shift is somehow in response to the liberal critics who insisted that in the current period, the poor are a junk of jobless, idle, and criminal minds. Therefore, the phrase became linked to blaming the population below poverty level for their insignificant social situation. Actually, in terms of descriptive level Murrays assertions are partly correct, but absolutely wrong in terms of an explanatory level. There exist numerous different explanations that can provide a more rational explanation regarding the concentration of marginality in the urban areas today. To begin with, the ever changing economy offers a number of great reasons as to why the UK has an underclass. Conservatives and liberals today emphasize a lot on values such as individual responsibility, particularly when considering issues like family formation, work ethic, violence, drugs, and teen pregnancy (Biressi & Nunn, 2013). Right realist thinkers primarily blame welfare for creating poverty and cannot see how someone can purposely diverge from culture’s mainstream. With joblessness being widespread, most people in the inner city experience stress and their communities experience distress, poor individuals try to adapt to such situations as much as they can, meeting the demands of this situation in most appropriate way they can. This creates an underground economy and in reality, this economy is what offers a means for the underclass population since the economy cannot. Actually, Murray tends to put so much blame on the poor such that he overlooks the possibilities that the rich are also potential criminals. For this reason he fails to recommend any changes that can be made for the benefits system. Murray ought to have been sensible enough to consider initiatives that would help tackle all forms of crime in the society. For instance, he should have considered initiatives like the New York initiative implemented by Bill Bratton. This initiative emphasized on zero tolerance to any form of crime, no matter how small the crime. The initiative believed that overlooking small crimes is what elevated the level of crime in the society. Had Murray he not focused on left realism he would have considered such ideologies, the right realism ideologies: modern ideologies that do not overlook mistakes done by the powerful through justifying them. Conclusion For one to understand the concept of underclass, they should consider the concept of poverty, and the left and right realism aspects. Branding all poor people as criminals in nature creates a high possibility for stereotypical statements and judgments that despite applying to certain individual groups, absolutely does not hold true for every individual within. Therefore, only a radical commentator can suggest that the entire underclass, negatively impact the society’s moral fabric, and amplify anti-social behavior because of their attitudes. References Anita, B., & Heather, N. (2013). Class and Contemporary British Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, GB. Biressi, A., & Nunn, H. (2013). Class and contemporary British culture. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Dwyer, P. (2010). Understanding social citizenship: Themes and perspectives for policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press. Herrnstein, R. & Murray, C. A. (2010). Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press Paperbacks. Lee J. & Turner, B. (2014). Conflicts About Class: Debating Inequality in Late Industrialism. London: Oxford University Press. McCoy, G. & Peddle, R. (2012). Neoliberal policy and its influence on welfare ideology: A source of social injustice? Socheolas Limerick Student Journal of Sociology. 3(2): 60- 79. Retrieved from Murray, C. A. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Murray, C. A. (2001). Underclass + 10: Charles Murray and the British Underclass 1990 – 2000. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: The Cromwell Press. Retrieved on April, 14, 2015. Pickard, S. (2014). Anti-social behaviour in Britain: Victorian and contemporary perspectives. London: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Crminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Crminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1688565-crminology
(Crminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Crminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1688565-crminology.
“Crminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1688565-crminology.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Charles Murrays Claims Concerning Britains Underclass

The Underclass and Group Offending

The underclass and Group Offending.... he term underclass was coined by journalist Auletta while in US, who in defining the term emphasized more on the values and behaviours of persons likely to be assigned the term “underclass”.... The underclass and Group Offending.... he term underclass was coined by journalist Auletta while in US, who in defining the term emphasized more on the values and behaviours of persons likely to be assigned the term “underclass”....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Robbery of John Murrays

The paper "Robbery of John murrays" states that if there is enough information that is beyond reasonable doubt the officer may conduct the search.... John murrays was passed by the officers to accompany them to the police station.... After the phone conversation, detective Colombo informed murrays of what he had learned from the phone call.... John murrays confessed, to having committed the robbery....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Crime, Underclass, and the Threat to Stability and Welfare

The concept of the underclass has become a routine feature of numerous criminological studies.... Put simply, the underclass is the product of the interrelationship of numerous social forces, characterized by high levels of crime and the development of criminal morality, and partially excluded from the most important social processes, due to their social belonging.... The underclass has already become one of the most popular topics of scholarly analysis in British criminology....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

A LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE UNDERCLASS & CRIME:HOW TO DEAL WITH AN ECONOMIC,POLITICAL AND CULTURALDISASTER

Blair Gibbs The underclass and Crime makes this assessment, claiming, “The underclass is not a symptom of unemployment, which is lower now than in the 1970s when the underclass was barely identifiable.... Let us say that there is a difference, a quantifiable one, between the underclass and the rest of society.... Gibbs claims that changing philosophies, are to blame....
4 Pages (1000 words) Literature review

Impact of Underclass on Moral Fabric of British Society

The essay "Impact of underclass on Moral Fabric of British Society" focuses on the critical analysis of the impact of the underclass on the moral fabric of British society.... This is quite evident in Right realist Murray's argument contending 'underclass' being the cause of degrading morals that continue to worsen by the day in the UK (Longhurst et al.... However, their arguments instead of giving concrete backing end up gravitating indirectly to Charles Murray's issue of 'underclass' similar to Cohen's argument (states' crime and human rights), which this study seeks to address....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Is Class Still Relevant in Contemporary Britain

In general, with technological advances came the rise of the post-industrial worker and as time goes on, the lines separating the upper-crust and the underclass get considerably murkier.... Is the term underclass a suitable identifier and a persuasive symbolic label as Marxists contend, or is it a post-industrial experience?... The term underclass is largely used to define the unemployed who have little prospects for long-term, permanent employment....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

New Rights Ideology and Thatcherite Policies

The New Right ideology developed in Britain since the late 1970s as the Conservative Party opposed welfare spending and was strengthened with Charles Murray's thesis of the 'underclass' and 'welfare dependency' in the late 1980s.... This term paper "New Rights Ideology and Thatcherite Policies" discusses the New Right ideology that grew in Britain that was based on the conservative approach....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Murrays Underclass Versus New Labors Social Exclusion

The author of this paper "Murrays underclass Versus New Labors Social Exclusion" will make an earnest attempt to discuss the differences between New Right welfare policies based on Murray's underclass and New Labor's 'social exclusion' policies.... Murray's depiction of 'underclass' as a combination of race and poverty that comprised of marginalized migrant workers, refugees, asylum seekers, inner-city minority population, who collectively had little control over income generation or assets (Lister, 1996)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us