StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Consider the extent to which burden of proofs conflict with the presumption of innocence in English Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The frequent clash and disagreement between the two legal obligations are elaborated in this paper as well.
Basically, the legal system of Wales and England is called…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Consider the extent to which burden of proofs conflict with the presumption of innocence in English Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Consider the extent to which burden of proofs conflict with the presumption of innocence in English Law"

Download file to see previous pages

In English Law, the judges use legal precedent and their common sense to formulate the laws. In England, it is possible to amend or revoke the English common law by the Parliament. A few of the oldest English laws which still exist today include the Distress Act of 1267 and a few sections of the Magna Carta of 1215. W. M. Geldart( p.7, 1918) states We commonly speak both of law and laws—the English Law, or the Laws of England ; and these terms, though not used with precision, point to two different aspects under which legal science may be approached.

The laws of a country are thought of as separate, distinct, individual rules; the law of a country, however much we may analyze it into separate rules, is something more than the mere sum of such rules. It is rather a whole, a system which orders our conduct ; in which the separate rules have their place and their relation to each other and to the whole ; which is never completely exhausted by any analysis, however far the analysis may be pushed, and however much the analysis may be necessary to our understanding of the whole.

The Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Proof are two very important laws which belong to the English Law. The Presumption of Innocence is the right that an accused gets in most modern countries of the world. Hence, until the persecution can gather further evidence to prove that the accused is guilty, the accused will be deemed as innocent. The prosecution on the other hand has a job which directly conflicts with the ‘Presumption of innocence’. Their job is to obtain the ‘The Burden of Proof’.

So the proof that the prosecution needs to gather has to be convincing enough. This would make the jury pronounce that the accused is guilty without any doubt. But if there are certain doubts, the accused will be acquitted. The Presumption of Innocence is very similar to the Latin principle ‘Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat’, hence many consider it to be based on this

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Consider the extent to which burden of proofs conflict with the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557847-consider-the-extent-to-which-burden-of-proofs-conflict-with-the-presumption-of-innocence-in-english-law
(Consider the Extent to Which Burden of Proofs Conflict With the Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557847-consider-the-extent-to-which-burden-of-proofs-conflict-with-the-presumption-of-innocence-in-english-law.
“Consider the Extent to Which Burden of Proofs Conflict With the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1557847-consider-the-extent-to-which-burden-of-proofs-conflict-with-the-presumption-of-innocence-in-english-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Consider the extent to which burden of proofs conflict with the presumption of innocence in English Law

Between the Birksian Theory and the Traditional Approach in the English Law of Unjust Enrichment

Unjust enrichment has always been a controversial issue in english law.... Between the Birksian theory and the traditional approach in the english law of Unjust Enrichment [Author, Name] Date Introduction Central to any question of financial crime or the court's role in assigning damages is the issue of the financial recompense.... If there is no doubt that the law restitution of unjust enrichments exists, it is not still clearly determined what is considered to be an unjust enrichment and in what cases the enrichment should be defined as “unjust”....
28 Pages (7000 words) Essay

Coalition Governments Localism Agenda

The Localism Act The Localism Act, which became law on November 2011, signalled a “radical shift of power from Westminster to local people,” according to the announcement of the Coalition Government (Silver, 2010).... They include, among others: How equal representation may be guaranteed for everyone in formulating neighbourhood plans Provision of financial and intellectual support for neighbourhood forums The prescribed process of adapting valid local plans in light of the Localism Bill Ensuring collaboration between local authorities in arriving at strategic plans Coordinating at a national level through the National Planning Policy Framework How effectively the New Homes Bonus and a reformed CIL will be in incentivising development The practical application of ‘presumption in favour of sustainable development' Ensuring transparent & effective consultation with neighbourhoods by businesses Maintaining a balance between participation & representation by holding local members to account (Chelgate, 2011) Other than these issues, the new legislation imposes an expanded set of responsibilities for both local authorities and developers....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Reverse Burdens Whittle Down the Rule in the ECHR

However, since Lord Sankey's assessment of the rule relative to the burden of proof in a criminal trial, the list of statutory exceptions have increased significantly and courts have been finding creative ways for reconcilin… g the reverse burden exceptions with the presumption of innocence as expressed in Article 6 of the ECHR.... The rule is therefore reflective of the presumption of innocence as provided for in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Burden and Standard of Proof

) The Defendant has a right to a fair trial,b) the presumption of innocence is an important but not an absolute right and so derogations from the principle are permitted.... resumption of innocence:Legal burdens on defendants may have to be considered in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is now incorporated into english law Under the Human Rights Act 199812.... In order to answer this question it is necessary to discuss the burden of proof in civil and criminal cases, Standard of Proof of civil and criminal cases, and relevant case laws....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Reversing the Burden of Proof

Articles 9, 14 and 15 spell out these rights in great detail - from the presumption of innocence to the right against self-incrimination to the right against double jeopardy and to the famous Miranda doctrine.... ence the presumption of innocence, which serves not only to protect a particular individual on trial, but to maintain public confidence in the enduring integrity and security of the legal system'.... Closer to home, under Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights, an accused enjoys a presumption of innocence....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Advocates of Human Rights and Champions of Countrys and Citizens Safety

“It is precisely in order to protect this presumption of innocence that defendants are not generally required to face evidence which, while it may be highly prejudicial, does not actually prove the particular case against them” Keeping this exclusive right of the defendant, he is excluded from 'similar fact evidence' meaning similar crimes committed by the accused in past will not have any bearing on the present case.... presumption of guilt is unfair, unethical, biased and detrimental to human rights of the individual and in most of the cases....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Forensic Science and Law: The Use of the Fingerprints and DNA Samples of Innocent Persons

So Courts need to handle this issue to avoid conflict between PACE 1984 and Article 8.... The author states that PACE allows the retention and use of the fingerprints and DNA samples of innocent persons, which is significant interference with the rights of such individuals under Article 8 of the ECHR.... (1) of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 provides taking fingerprints without consent extends the circumstance in which the police may take a person's fingerprints without consent to include taking fingerprints from a person arrested for a recordable offense and detained in the police station....
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

The Presumption of Innocence in English Law

This paper "the presumption of innocence in english law" discusses Arnold who was a member of an anti-capitalist organization committed to the violent overthrow of society.... The starting point is to consider the actions of Arnold.... hellip; He made a telephone call to a police station in which he threatened to release toxic gas into the underground rail system of a city within thirty minutes.... nbsp; The first thing to consider in respect of Arnold is whether his actions amount to murder or whether manslaughter would be more appropriate....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us