Organized Human Activity - Essay Example

An organization is a structure with a ‘collage’ of humans or workers doing their allocated work under the supervision of a leader. But, the crucial fact is, most of the organization will be managed differently, based on the characteristics of the workers who work in it, among other reasons. Likewise, there is a difference between managing people in a small marketing consultancy and in a family-run shoe factory.

Firstly, inside a family-run shoe factory, there will be an inbuilt or rooted organizational culture, built by the founder or the leader. That is, in any organization, the workers like the five different fingers in one’s hand, will be different from one another, as they will come from different backgrounds. The unison of these different humans under a single organization to reach a target is, and will always be a difficult proposition. As these different humans could only create a different working culture, the success rate will be minimal. Inside the shoe factory, this organizational culture could be easily established because being a family-run factory, the founder or owner would have recruited or posted his/her family members from the same background in important positions. Also, as there will be a close relationship between the employees, it will reflect in the work. Another vital element is, culture “coevolves” with the organization when it achieves success (Schein). So, managing them will be an easy affair because of the presence of a common organizational culture. But, in the case of the marketing consultancy, the workers could be from different backgrounds having different educational qualifications, ethnicity, etc, etc. In those environments, the workers will only exhibit different mindsets, and so the formation of a common organizational culture is a difficult task or it will take time. So, managing a small marketing consultancy firm with different workers would also be a difficult task.

Inside the family-run shoe factory, on the flip side, even if the workers are found to be inept, they will not be fired easily. That is, when the employee becomes too lazy, self-seeking, troublemaker, and has many bad attributes, the leader or manager has to be decisive and fire him/her from the organization. But, inside a family-run organization, where workers will be related, this option of firing will be used minimally. As firing or any other strong steps, will also affect the personal or family relationship, it will be done only selectively. Companies that do not have proper disciple risk severe damage to their reputation, criminal/legal action, and regulatory penalties. (Advice on management). But in a small marketing consultancy firm, if the workers are found to be obstacles in the growth of the organization, they will be “weeded” out. This way, they will imbue into the mind of the employees, that if they function in an inept manner, they will automatically be fired. ” Executives owe it to the organization and to their fellow workers not to tolerate nonperforming individuals in important jobs” (Peter Drucker).