World Politics in the Future: the Conflict between the West and the Rest – Literature review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "World Politics in the Future: the Сonflict between the West and the Rest" is a perfect example of a literature review on politics. Politics of the twentieth century needs more than just an interpretation and accurate analysis. More in-depth knowledge is needed to relate to the events occurring in the world of politics. This interpretation and analysis are necessary so that leaders and citizens at a global level can use the knowledge to make better changes and sound decisions which can lead to improved changes in the future. The main tools that can make the world a better place are informed interpretations of events as to how and why are they occurring. Introduction According to Weiss, et al.

(2007) politics these days are following different trends that lead to many different events happening and their effects are seen to be effective at a global scale. The events following such political trends affect everyone. Therefore, one needs to think about the trends in the political scenario that are to be noticed in the future as these trends in a collective manner may affect international relations as well.

An understanding of the unveiling trends has become a need for a common global citizen. These can also have everlasting effects on the future. There is a need to interpret and analyze political trends. As Rourke and Boyer (2001) say, the world today is a happening place as newspapers are full of daily occurrences. Bloodshed in Iraq; the rising and thus, fluctuating oil prices; fluctuating prices of the Euro that relates to the prices of all the currencies in the world; these include the events related to the global crisis or the global crunch.

Even weather changes can be classified with the mentioned events. These are some examples where global citizens might think that it is a turbulent period for the world as the events represent such catastrophic events that can disturb people on an international scale. According to Armstrong, Farrell, and Maiguashca (2003), one cannot stop but think that the turbulent events, in whatever form, are the ones that affect every human being on this planet in one way or the other. The meaning and rationale of these events need to be understood and all these events need to be interpreted in a better manner.

This is one of the most difficult tasks the global citizens are facing today. Franke (2001) says that global trends are a part of international relations and therefore, an analysis of human behaviors in the case of international relations is the toughest job one can have. Berenskoetter and Williams (2007) say that in this case assumptions and perceptions play the least role. Some of the people, even without having proper and sound knowledge, can presume that the situation of individuals can also imply this.

In some cases, leaders and individuals are prone to ignoring the facts that are opposite to the values and beliefs that they hold. Harff and Gurr (2003) say that being at a very important seat, the president of the United States has the responsibility that means that the assumptions made at this point are the ones that represent the core facts and realities. The interpretation of global events, the explication of global problems, explaining the policies is the responsibility on the shoulders of those people who sit on representative seats.

Hanson (2008) says that in this case there are many theories made and they, in fact, emerge from a set of assumptions that the person or a group of people from the higher authority have.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us