Primary Assessment for Learning - Collaborative Learning – Literature review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Primary Assessment for Learning - Collaborative Learning” is an impressive variant of a literature review on education. The principles of collaborative learning and motivation have been widely used in education for its positive impacts like facilitation of critical thinking, performance as well as retention abilities (Antil, Jenkins and Watkins, 1998). As indicated in this review, there is ample evidence that cognitive skills can be improved through student group interaction and how the pupils assume their social learning role in a learning environment (Wigfield, Eccles, and Rodrigues, 1998). Apart from small groups, teachers also employ the use of mixed ability tables in the Collaborative strategies which enhances students their morale.

The pupils perform their respective tasks/assignments with minimal direct intrusion by their instructors/teachers. The students are well motivated and are accomplishing their tasks in the way they think best, with individual accountability as well as positive inter-dependence in their collaboration. A further review of the video segment linked to the Action Research project in Park Lane Primary is presented. Collaboration and motivationCollaborative learning is the method of involving students to work in small groups cooperatively and be able to apply the basic learning strategies (Jafre, Abidin and Riswanto, 2012: 192).

It can also be defined as the bringing together and pairing of learners in order to achieve or realize an academic aim through interaction with other students while discussing cooperating on tasks among other things In simple terms, motivation refers to the general interest and enthusiasm which can be generated by topics or sometimes by students themselves as they find out more on the topic, knowledge of, or views associated with the topics under study.

In addition, motivation can be established following the principle of differentiation in the pupil's learning process and development and is dependent on the students (Wigfield, Eccles, and Rodrigues, 1998). The element of motivation in collaborative learning is associated with various benefits including the development of cognitive processes in the process of learning since it is attributed to storing information the long-term memory, recognitions well s retrieval. In addition, Motivation is believed to impacts significantly on either the nature or type of learning activities number of ways including balancing of the students’ input into appropriate proportion to the level of complexity of the given assignment or tasks.

It also affects the use of learning methods thus encouraging them to not only learn but also achieve their desired objectives successfully. Overview of the segmentThe Action Research project in Park Lane Primary is all about examining the effectiveness of the different collaborative learning strategies aimed at encouraging self-esteem, progress as well as increasing their overall involvement or participation in their learning. An illustration by Teacher Pippa McGeoch in reference to Year 6 class gives encouraging outcomes of the various learning styles employed.

For instance, learners are well motivated as their work together with their counterparts at different mixed ability tables. Also, in a math class, students are able to apply various choices of success criteria to understand co-ordination and differentiation concepts. Through the various methods, students are accommodated in the planning process hence they feel some sense of ownership of whatever they learn. More learning has been encouraged through the Jigsaw methods where they conduct research on various subjects or topics and teach others.

Students writing skills are also enhanced.      

Reference

Antil, L., Jenkins, J., & Watkins, S. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 419–454.

Barbara Blake and Tambra Pope (2008) Developmental Psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories in Classrooms Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education Vol. 1, No. 1 (May 2008) 59 – 67

Chandrekaran (1989).Task-structure, Knowledge Acquisition, and learning, Marine Learning Vol4: 339-345

Chih-Cheng Lin, Hsin-Jung Chan, Hsien-Sheng Hsiao (2011): EFL Students’ Perceptions Of Learning Vocabulary In A Computer-Supported Collaborative Environment, The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology – April 2011, Volume 10 Issue2:91-99

Deborah, P, (2008). Interactional differentiation in the mixed-ability group: a situated view of two struggling readers.(Report)Reading Research Quarterly, July 1, 2008, retrieved from http://business.highbeam.com/137985/article-1G1-208890648/interactional-differentiation-mixed ability-group-situated 28th April 2012. 02.41 pm

Dods, R. F. (1997). An action research study of the effectiveness of problem-based learning in promoting the acquisition and retention of knowledge. J. Educ. Gifted, 20, 423–437.

Dousek, M (2007)Teaching with collaborative groups Vinculum, v.44, no.1, Term 1, 2007, p.14- 16 (ISSN: 0157-759X)

Dunn, R., and Griggs, S. A., (eds.) (2000) Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education, Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey

Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, Vol.106 (3): 385-415.

Garner, B.K. (2008). When students seem stalled: The missing link for too many kids who don’t “get it?” cognitive structures. Educational Leadership 65(6), 32-38

Gary K. Clabaugh, (2010).The Educational Theory of Jean Piaget:a multidimensional analysis, New Foundations

Hausfather, Samuel J., (1996) Vygotsky and Schooling: Creating a Social Contest for learning. Action in Teacher Education. (18) 1-10.

Hughes, H. and Townley, A. 1994, ‘Cooperative Learning in Graduate Education: A Study of Its Effectiveness in Administrator Training in Two California Universities’, ERIC document ED 375517.

Hurley, M. (2000). Video-based Supplemental Instruction (VSI): An Interactive Delivery System that Facilitates Student Learning. Doctoral dissertation, School of Education, University of Missouri-Kansas City

Jafre, M., Abidin, Z., and Riswanto (2012) Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) within Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies perspectives International Journal of Humanities and Social Science February 2012, Vol. 2(3):192-198

Johnson, D., Johnson, R. Y Holubec, E. (1998) Cooperation in the classroom. 7th ed., Interaction Book Company

McLachlan, S., and Hagger, M.S., (2010).Effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention on tutor behaviors in a higher education context Teaching and Teacher Education Vol.26,

Mohamed, A.A., and Helal, H.E., (2012) Learning Styles of Community Health Nursing Students’ at Faculty of Nursing and Technical Institute of Nursing - In Alexandria New York Science Journal, 2012;5(4):28-37 Issue 5, July 2010, Pages 1204–1210

Monica, M., Dickson, M., and Abel .F.S., (2012) Homogenous Grouping and Mixed Ability: A Comparative Approach on Two Rural Secondary Schools in Muzarabani District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 4 [Special Issue – February 2012] 279-286

Morrison, GR., Ross, SM., Kemp, J.E., (2004). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York

Newton, C., (2011) Teacher Testimonials (online) 27th April, 2012 at 02:06AM retrieved from.http://sites.google.com/site/edu203project6caminewton/classroom- news/howcollaborativelearningcanbeusedintheclassroom

Norin. A. M. (2008) Learning through teaching and sharing in the jigsaw classroom Annal. Dent Univ. Malaya Vol. 15(2): 71-76.

Prince, M., (2004) Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research, J. Engir.education, vol.93 (3):223-231

Rogers, K.B. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, Vol.82 (595): 38-46.

Rosser, S., and Tuitt, F., (2009) Cornell University Faculty Institute for Diversity workshop led June 2009, Cornell University

Slavin, R.E. (2003). Educational psychology: theory and practice. Pearson Education, Inc.

Stepanek, J., (1999). The Inclusive Classroom Meeting the Needs of Gifted Students: Differentiating Mathematics and Science Instruction: It’s Just Good Teaching, US: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

The Scottish Government, (2009). Curriculum for excellence building the curriculum 4 skills for learning, skills for life, and skills for work. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh.

Van der M.H., (2005). Knowledge construction through CSCL: Student elaborations in synchronous, asynchronous, and 3-D learning environments. Drukkerij Tamminga, Duiven, The Netherlands.

Vass, E., & Littleton, K. (2010). Peer collaboration and learning in the classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & J. Kleine Stearman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 105-135). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Wiedmann, M., Leah, R.C., Rummel, N., and Wiley, J., (2012). Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science (online) DOI: 10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y.

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children's motivation in the school context. Review of Research in Education, 23, 73-118.

Wintergersta, A. C., DeCapuab, A., and Itzenc, R. C. (2001) The construct validity of one learning styles instrument, System, 29: 385–403

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us