The paper "Diversity in Culture of Different Places and at Different Times" is an outstanding example of a literature review on anthropology. I agree with the anthropologists’ perspective of a world full of contact and linkages, movement and mixture, as well as cultural exchange and interaction. The world is highly connected where rapid flows of people, capital, images, goods as well as ideologies change the globe into webs of communication compressing the sense of space and time. Commodity chains are usually analyzed in terms of broadly spread industrial production features of contemporary transnational trade.
Nevertheless, the concept is useful in the interpretation of the fluidity with regard to other types of global distribution and production, incorporating the social place of small scale entrepreneurship as well as agricultural commodities’ global distribution. The cultural power is in the hands of producers whose impact is felt through the commodity chains to urban markets that are far places. In regard to Atlantic bluefin tuna, the predominant cultural power goes beyond a uniform market core to peripheral diverse production, but accommodations of local and core systems of cultural and economic production are locally specific.
This is the view according to Bestor (2001, p. 80). This paper explores this perspective while examining Linda and Rosaldo and Schultz and Lavenda's observation. Globalization represents diversity in the culture of different places and at different times. All these illustrations point to the compression of time and space hence enhancing globalization. Linda and Rosaldo (2002, p6) are of the opinion that globalization is not only concerned with mapping the shape taken by specific flows of people, capital, images, goods, and ideologies that go around the globe but further with the experiences of people residing in particular places when more and more of their daily lives are contingent on social processes that are globally extensive.
They point out that anthropology provides what is missing in other disciplines which are a concrete attentiveness to the practices of daily lives, human agency, and generally how subjects integrate globalization processes. Having an anthropological introduction to globalization is focusing precisely on large-scale processes by which the world is increasingly becoming interconnected and the manner in which subjects react to the processes in ways that are culturally oriented.
The world of globalization somehow points out the human imagination and agency. Inda and Rosaldo (2002, p6) point out the basic reorganization of space and time besides the global interconnectedness. This is the same view held by Bestor (2001, p83) in his article. Globalization is largely about intensified global interconnectedness as well as an intensification of circuits of political, economic, ecological, and cultural interdependence.
Bestor, T.C., 2001, Supply-side Sushi: Commodity, Market, and the Global City, American Anthropologist, 103 (1): 76-95.
Inda, J.X., & Rosaldo, R., 2002, The Anthropology of globalization, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA.
Lavenda, R.H., & Schultz, E.A., 2005, Anthropology: A perspective on the human condition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.