Age Discrimination and Ageism Level – Literature review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Age Discrimination and Ageism Level" is a good example of a literature review on psychology. Ageing is the inevitable natural process of life which leads one to grow with time with advancing age and mortality. The perception of ageing varies individually – for someone, it is the general age with which one identifies, for the others, the perception of age comes relatively lately. As people grow older, they experience numerous structural and functional changes both at physiological as well as psychological level, which influence significantly in the later developmental phases of their life.

Few people experience the unpleasant effect of discrimination and prejudice because of their age. Ageism indicates to any event in which individuals are negatively judged not by their behaviour, personality or action but by their age. They are inaccurately portrayed as weak or inflexible. Hence, ageism implies a prejudice among the given society against older individuals. According to Traxler (1980), ageism can be described as any approach or deed which presides over a person or group of persons and their responsibilities in the social order merely on the foundation of their organic age.

However, some older adults may not be physically or mental abilities and need more care, there are a number of elderly people who may not be included in the stereotype of helpless, mindless or passionless individuals. The concept of ageism is primarily based on two crucial factors – The dynamism of age classification: The classification of age is not static. The age classification changes as an individual move through the development of continuum. Hence, the classification of age is featured by a continual change compared to other static classifications such as race, gender which is used by society. The inevitability of achieving the status ‘ old’ : In the course of time, each and everyone has to be identified as being ‘ old’ , in other words, ageism occurs at everyone’ s age, until and unless early mortality commences. The second factor may be considered as a significant characteristic affecting the individual primarily at two levels.

The individual may act as an ageist with respect to others for which he or she may identify stereotypically other people on the basis of their age.

Secondly, the individual may be an ageist with respect to self for which his or her self concept may be affected and biased by his or her ageist attitudes.  

References

http://www.graypanthersmetrodetroit.org/Ageism.html

Ray, S. & Sharp, E (2006. Ageism, Policy Unit, Age Concern England, Prof Dominic Abrams, Centre for the Study of Group Processes, University of Kent.

Dilley, R (2003). Ageism Hits Generation X, BBC News Online

Aronson, B. S. (1966). The individual stereotypes of ageing. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 458-462.

Austin, D. R. (1985). A hierarchical research of approaches towards elder age. The Gerontologist, 25, 431-434.

Baggett, S. & Dickinson, K. (1978, November). Attitudinal cost of grown-up helpers in the community school systems. Document offered at the 31st yearly methodical conference of the Gerontological Society, Dallas.

Beere, C. A. (1979). An instructional manual of different experiments on women and women’s issues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Beeson, D. (1975). Females in the learning of aging process: An analysis and implication. Societal Problems, 23, 52-59.

Bell, J. (1992). Looking for a discussion on aging: The aged folks on TV. The Gerontologist, 32, 305-311.

Bishop, J. M. & Krause, D. R. (1984). Portrayal of old age on Saturday sunup TV. The Gerontologist, 24, 91-94.

Block, M. R., Davidson, J. L., & Grambs, J. D. (1981). Females over forty year of age: Visualizations and Veracities. New York: Springer.

Brown, J. K. (1985). In her most important. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.

Brubaker, T. H. & Powers, E. A. (1976). The label of "elderly": A re-evaluation and another advance. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 441-447.

Busse, I. W. (1968). Point of view: unfairness and gerontology. The Gerontologist, 8, 66.

Butler, R. N. (1969). Ageism: One more form of narrow-mindedness. The Gerontologist, 9, 243-246.

Butler, R. N. & Lewis, M. I. (1977). Ageing and psychological fitness. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

Crockett, W. H., & Hummert, M. L. (1987). Insights of ageing and the aged people. In K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Twelve-monthly reassess of Gerontology as well as Geriatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 217-242). New York: Springer.

Davies, L. J. (1977). Approaches toward ageing as revealed by comedy. The Gerontologist, 17, 220-226.

Dye, C. J. (1978). Psychologists' responsibility in the stipulation of mind health worries the aged people. Professional Psychologist, 9, 38-49.

Elliott, J. (1984). The daylight TV play depiction of grown-ups. The Gerontologist, 24, 628-633.

Fillmer, H. T. (1982). Sex typecasting of aged by brood. Enlightening Gerontology, 8, 77-85.

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1980). Ageing with TV: Imagery in TV play and outsets of societal veracity. Journal of Communication, 30, 37-47.

Golde, P. & Kogan, N. (1958). A verdict achievement process for weighing up the outlooks toward elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology, 14, 355-363.

Green, S.K. (1981). Outlooks and awareness concerning the aged: present and upcoming standpoints. Ageing and human being Development, 13, 95-115.

Gutmann, D. (1985). The cross-cultural point of view: Notes en route for a virtual psychology of ageing. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.) Instructional manual of Ageing and the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hultsch, D. F. & Deutsch, F. (1981). Grown-ups growth and ageing: A lifetime viewpoint. New York: McGraw Hill.

Kastenbaum, R. (1973, April). On demise and disappearing: Should we have varied opinion concerning our ambivalence towards the elderly? Document accessible at an inter-disciplinary conference of the Boston Society of Gerontologic Psychiatry, Boston.

Kastenbaum, R. (1978). Way out of life: Society's oral draft for aged and casualty. In D. D. Van Tassel (Ed.) Ageing, casualty, and the finishing point of life form. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Kastenbaum, R. & Durkee, N. (1964a). Aged people vision of elderly age. In R. Kastenbaum (Ed.) Recent feelings on elderly age. New York: Springer.

Kastenbaum, R. & Durkee, N. (1964b). Younger generation outlook of elderly age. In R. Kastenbaum (Ed.) Recent opinion on elderly age. New York: Springer.

Kilty, K. M. & Feld, A. (1976). Approaches toward ageing and en routes for the requirements of elder individuals. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 586-594.

Kimmel, D. C. (1988). Ageism, psychology and community strategy. American Psychologist, 43, 175-178.

Kite, M. E., & Johnson, B. T. (1988). A meta-analysis on outlooks toward elder and mature adults. Psychology and Aging, 3, 232-244.

Kogan, N. (1979). Philosophy, outlooks, and labels in relation to aged people: A latest glance at some previous questions. Research on Aging, 1, 11-36.

Kuypers, J. A. & Bengtson, V. L. (1973). Social collapse and capability: A sculpt of typical aging. Human Development, 16, 181-201.

Larson, R. (1978). 30 years of study on the biased happiness of grown-up Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109-125.

Lowenthal, M. F., Thurnher,, M., & Chiriboga, D. (1975). 4 phases of existence: A relative schoolwork of women and men in front of changeover. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mangen, D. J. & Peterson, W. A. (1982). Study gadgets in societal gerontology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Martel, M. V. (1968). Age-sex functions in American periodical creative writing (1830-1955). In B. Neugarten (Ed.) Normal age and aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McTavish, D. G. (1971). Insights of aged folks: A reassess of study methodologies and conclusion. The Gerontologist, 11, 90-101.

Miller, R. B. & Dodder, R. A. (1980). A review of Palmore's evidence on Aging cross-examination. The Gerontologist, 20, 673-679.

Mitchell, J., Wilson, K., Revicki, D., & Parker, L. (1985). Junior’s sensitivities of ageing: A multi-dimensional move towards the disparities by age, gender, and competition. The Gerontologist, 25, 182-187.

Northcott, H. C. (1975). Extremely youthful, extremely older - Ageism in the TV The Gerontologist, 15, 184-186.

Nuessel, F. H. (1982). The verbal communication of ageism. The Gerontologist, 22, 273-276.

Palmore, E. (1971). Approaches toward ageing as revealed in the course of wit. The Gerontologist, 11, 181-186.

Palmore, E. (1977). Particulars on ageing: A small cross-examine. The Gerontologist, 17, 315-320.

Passuth, P. M. & Cook, F. L. (1985). Consequences of TV screening on information and outlooks in relation to grown-ups: An important review. The Gerontologist, 25, 68-77.

Payne, B. P. & Whittington, F. (1976). Grown-up women - Assessment of trendy typecasts and study facts. Social Problems, 23, 488-504.

Petersen, M. (1973). The representation of elderly folks on TV. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 568-573.

Ramsdell, M. L. (1973). The ordeal of TV's bothered soap peoples. Family Coordinator, 22, 299-304.

Ray, D. C., McKinney, K. A., & Ford, C. V. (1987). Differentiations in psychologist's rankings of grown-up and juvenile clientele. The Gerontologist, 27, 82-86.

Riley, M. & Foner, A. (1968). Ageing and the social order, Vol. I. A list of study results. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Rosencranz, H. A. & McNevin, T. E. (1968). A feature examination of approaches toward the elderly. The Gerontologist, 8, 55-58.

Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-role labels and self ideas in university learners. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 32, 287-285.

Ross, M., Tait, R., Brandeberry, L., Grossberg, G., & Nakra, R. (1986). Age divergences in affecting and corporeal fitness. Poster presentation, Midwest Psychological Association, Chicago.

Schaie, K. W. (1988). Ageism process in the psychological study. American Psychologist, 43, 179-183.

Schmidt, D. F. & Boland, S. M. (1986). Arrangement of insights of grown-ups: proof for various casts. Psychology and Aging, 1, 255-260.

Schonfield, D. (1982). Who is classifying whom and why? The Gerontologist, 22, 267-272.

Silverman, M. (1977). The elder man as women: becoming aware of typecasts of elderly men with a femaleness extent. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 336-338.

Slater, P. E. (1964). Cross educational visions of the elderly. In R. Kastenbaum (Ed.) New thoughts on old age. New York: Springer.

Swenson, C. F. (1983). A well thought-of elderly age. American Psychologist, 38, 327-333.

Thomas, E. C. & Yamamoto, K. (1975). Approaches in the direction of age: An examination in school-age kids. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6, 117-129.

Tibbits, C. (1979). Can we nullify off-putting labels in ageing? The Gerontologist, 19, 10-20.

Traxler, A. J. (1980). Let's acquire gerontologized: just beginning compassion to ageing. The versatile elder centre notion: A tuition guidebook for experts functioning with the ageing. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Aging.

Tuckman, J. & Lavell, M. (1957). Self-classification to be old or not. Geriatrics, 12, 666-671.

Tuckman, J. & Lorge, I. (1953). Approaches toward elderly people. Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 249-260.

U.S. Bureau of Census (1983). America’s changeover: An ageing civilization. Present Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 128. Washington, DC: Government Printing House.

Weinberger, L. E. (1979). Typecasting of the aged: Basic school children's answers. Study of Aging, 1, 113-136.

Weinberger, L. E. & Millham, J. (1975). A multi-dimensional, manifold means examination of approaches toward the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 343-348.

Wilensky, H. & Barmack, J. (1966). Happiness of doctoral learners in scientific psychology in efforts with grown-up folks. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 410-414.

Wilson, J. F. & Hafferty, F. W. (1983). Long-standing consequences of a tutorial on ageing and physical condition for fresh medicinal students. The Gerontologist, 23, 319-324.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us