Piagetian and Vygotskian Theories with Practice – Literature review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Рiаgеtiаn аnd Vygоtskiаn Thеоriеs with Рrасtiсе” is a   thoughtful variant of literature review on education. Piaget's hypothesis of cognitive development is an exhaustive hypothesis about the nature and advancement of human knowledge. Piaget trusted that one's youth plays an imperative and dynamic part of their adulthood advancement. Piaget's thought is basically known as a formative stage hypothesis (  Baldwin, 2005). The hypothesis manages the way of learning itself and how people steadily come to procure, build, and utilize it. To Piaget, the psychological improvement was a dynamic revamping of mental procedures coming about because of organic development and ecological experience (Piaget, Gruber & Voneche, 2001).

He posited that youngsters develop a comprehension of their general surroundings, experience disparities between what they definitely know and what they find in their surroundings, then, and modify their thoughts as needs be (McLeod, 2012). Additionally, Piaget asserted that subjective advancement is at the focal point of the human life form, and dialect is dependent upon information and comprehension obtained through intellectual improvement. Piaget's prior work got the best consideration. As a result, numerous guardians have been urged to give a rich, strong environment for their children’ s regular inclination to develop and learn (Piaget, 1997; Piaget, 1996).

The children’ s or young students’ focused classrooms and "open instruction" are immediate utilization of Piaget's perspectives. Notwithstanding its enormous achievement, Piaget's hypothesis has a few impediments that Piaget perceived himself: for instance, the hypothesis bolsters sharp stages instead of nonstop improvement (Kallio, 1995). The scenario described in this paper is a classic example of the demonstration of Piaget’ s theory. Review of LiteraturePiaget and his associates led a few investigations to evaluate formal operational thought.

In one of their analyses, Piaget assessed the intellectual capabilities of children of various ages using a scale and differing weights (Bruner, 2006). The errand was to adjust the scale by snaring weights on the ends of the scale. To effectively finish the undertaking, the children had to utilize formal operational thought to understand that the separation of the weights from the middle and the heaviness of the weights both influenced the parity. A heavier weight must be put nearer to the focal point of the scale, and a lighter weight must be distanced from the inside so that the two weights adjust to each other (Lourenç o & Machado, 1994).

While 3-to 5-year olds could not fathom the idea of balancing, kids by the age of 7 could adjust the scale by setting the same weights on both ends; however, they neglected to understand the significance of the location. By age 10, the same children could consider location yet neglected to utilize rationale and rather utilized experimentation. At last, by the age of 13 and 14, in their early adolescence, a few children comprehended the relationship amongst weight and distance and thus could effectively actualize their theory (Jordan & Brownleem 2004). Piaget discovered that youngsters in the solid operational stage could consolidate inductive rationale.

Then again, kids at this age experience issues utilizing deductive rationale, which includes utilizing a general standard to foresee the result of a particular occasion. This incorporates mental reversibility (  Baldwin, 2005). A case of this is having the capacity to invert the request of connections between mental classes. For instance, a youngster may have the capacity to perceive that his or her pet dog is a Labrador, that a Labrador is a pooch, and that a puppy is a creature, and reach determinations from the data accessible, and in addition apply every one of these procedures to speculative circumstances (Kail, 2007).

The unique nature of a child’ s idea at the formal operational level is clear in the pre-adults verbal critical thinking ability. The intelligent nature of an adult’ s thinking is when such an adult takes care of issues in an experimentation style. Sometimes young students start to think more as a researcher considers, conceiving arrangements to take care of issues and methodically test feelings (  Baldwin, 2005).

They utilize speculative deductive thinking, which implies that they create theories or best suppositions, and deliberately find, which is the best way to follow in taking care of the issue. Amid this stage, the child can comprehend love, coherent confirmations, and qualities. Amid this stage the youngster starts to engage potential outcomes for the future and is captivated with what they can be (  Lautrey, 2002).


Bruner, J. (2006). Studies in cognitive growth: A collaboration at the Center for Cognitive Studies. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Baldwin, J. (2005). Jean Piaget. Key thinkers in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Retrieved from

Callaghan, T. C. (2005). Cognitive Development beyond Infancy. In B. Hopkins (Ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development (pp. 204-209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from

Cole, M. (2005). Culture and cognitive development. In Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Retrieved from

Commons, M. L., & Pekker, A. (2008). Presenting the formal theory of hierarchical complexity. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution, 65 (1-3), 375-382.

Demetriou, A. (2003). Mind, self, and personality: Dynamic interactions from late childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Adult Development,10(3), 151-171. Retrieved from

Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

Humphreys, L.G.; Rich, S.A.; Davey, T.C. (1985). "A Piagetian Test of General Intelligence". Developmental Psychology. 21: 872–877.

Jordan, V. B., & Brownlee, L. (2004, April). A meta-analysis of the relationship between Piagetian and school achievement tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.

Kail, Robert (2007). Children and Their Development (4 ed.). Pearson.

Kallio, E. (2011). Integrative thinking is the key: an evaluation of current research into the development of thinking in adults. Theory & Psychology, 21(6), 785 – 801.

Kallio, E. 1995. Systematic reasoning: Formal or postformal cognition? Journal of Adult Development, 2 (3), 187-192.

Kegan, Robert. (2012). The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Lautrey, J. (2002). Is there a general factor of cognitive development? In Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lourenço, O.; Machado, A. (1996). "In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms". Psychological Review. 103 (1): 143–164.

McLeod, S.(2012). A. "Piaget |Cognitive Theory". Simply Psychology.

Piaget, J. (1977). The role of action in the development of thinking. In Knowledge and development (pp. 17-42). Springer US.

Piaget, J. (1996). Piaget’s theory. In Piaget and his school (pp. 11-23). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg.

Piaget, J., Gruber, H. (Ed.), & Voneche, J. J. (Ed.). (2001). The essential Piaget (100th Anniversary Ed.). New York: Jason Aronson.

Torres, J., and Ash, M. (2007). Cognitive development. In Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals. Retrieved from

Vygotsky, L., & Vygotsky, S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Watson, J. B. (2004). Behaviorism. New York: People's Institute Publishing Company.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us