StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Basic GATT Obligations and Exceptions - Coursework Example

Summary
The paper "Basic GATT Obligations and Exceptions" states that the UK’s ban on the importation of orchids from Thailand is entitled to protection under Article XX (a). Trade regulations based on the life or health of the plant's interests qualify as legitimate considerations concerning public morals…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Basic GATT Obligations and Exceptions"

Case Scenario Name Institution Date Introduction Basically, while the total ban imposed by the UK government on orchid imports from Thailand might be small in comparison to other industries that have been involved within WTO disputes; the compliant of Thailand raises vital matters regarding the scale of the Article exceptions to General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (Robert, 2009).1 Basic GATT Obligations and Exceptions The GATT binds countries to obligations that facilitate free flow of goods between countries. When a member country puts up barriers to trade, for example import bans, another member country can challenge such legislation via WTO consultations and a dispute settlement panel. In view of that, Thailand is presently challenging UK’s ban on orchids on several grounds, one being Article XI, which forbids countries from imposing quantitative restrictions on imports2. Nevertheless, Article XX of the GATT gives numerous exemptions that permit countries to take reasonable measures for protecting “public morals” as well as “human, animal or plant life or health. Assuming UK’s ban on orchid’s importation from Thailand is not an “arbitrary or untenable restriction on international trade”, it may fall under Article XX exception to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’s general ban on import restrictions (Robert, 2009).3 An appellate organ of the WTO, within Reformulated Gasoline and consequently within Shrimp-Turtle, set up the lawful procedure, where a country can defend an Article XX exception. One, the country should demonstrate that the legislation restricting trade meets the criteria of a “provisional justification” under the pertinent Article XX exception. UK is supposed to illustrate that: The ban is aimed at protecting “public morals”, or protecting “human, animal or the life or health of the plant”. The ban is essential for achieving these ends The ban matches with the Article XX Chapeau, which rules out the measure from being arbitrary, unwarrantable, or a “disguised restriction on international trade” (Robert, 2009).4 The Exemptions to Article XX (a) & XX (b) include: Protection of public morals: Article XX (a) Whereas establishing the scale of any of Article XX’s sections could be contentious, definition of XX (a)’s “public morals” exemption is even additionally intricate because it lacks objectivity or scientific information5. The framework of the endorsement of the Article is a vital way of interpreting in examining the scale of the section. Founded on numerous pre-GATT domestic laws, it is evident that moral exemptions to import regulations were common during drafting. The exemptions to characteristic trade regulations consisted of import bans on articles varying from violent and obscene images, to profane things, to bird plumage. Such exemptions also existed within current treaty regimes within the decades preceding the GATT, in addition to [a] fter 1927, the moral and humanitarian exemption turned out to be a recognized practice within viable treaties. Among the treaties tackling moral matters, some were allied to plants. For instance, protection of plants covers the public health and safety, and also other crucial reasons superseding public interest, and this includes those of social or economic nature and valuable consequences of principal value for the environment (Wappriita Annual Report, 2007).6 Import and export guiding principles have in the past demonstrated concern for the protection of plants, even if the interests of free trade have constantly won out. However, those who drafted GATT within 1947 were indeed conscious of numerous morality-based exceptions within other commercial agreements as well as the life or health of the plant was among these concerns. Accordingly, there is an illustration that GATT drafters aimed at defining “public morals” according to the country’s existing cultural standards. Besides, lately, the number of nations taking measures of suppressing markets for plant products that does not meet their legislation has increased considerably. The state practice of UK, in addition to the big number of other countries, illustrates that the public sentiment in support of protection of life or health of the plant is strong. Whereas at present there are no international treaties about life or health of the plant, there is a history of such legislation in UK and there are also developments towards a global legal system that tackles the protection of endangered species. Again, even though there is no existence of a hard legal structure, there is strong proof of increasing concern for the protection of life or health of the plants (Wappriita Annual Report, 2007).7 Considering the numerous regulations that have been passed in preventing destruction of endangered plant species as well as protection of life or health of the plants internationally in combination with the evidence of UK’s subjective definition of morality toward plants, UK legislation would appear to fall in the scale of Article XX (a)8. The destruction of these plants is a moral concern, particularly when the harvesting and utilization of the plants poses extinction risks as well as destroys the environment. Even if destruction of plants might firmly amount to a moral concern under the Article XX (a), preservation of the plants would appear to fit even more evenly in the morality exemption. Many individuals quite considerably perceive the mishandling of plants as immoral9. Additionally, surveys also demonstrate that several UK residents have expressed reservations about the Orchid importation. Basing on the data gathered from these surveys, it seems that the first point of the test under Article XX (a) would likely to be fulfilled. The more intricate and more contentious issue is if the import ban is essential (Robert, 2009).10 “Necessary” for the Protection of Public Morals In establishing if a regulation is essential, a WTO dispute resolution organ takes into consideration two aspects: The nexus between the aim of the regulation and the home state If there is availability of less restrictive trade measures However, there is meager jurisprudence on Article XX (a) but it is rational to believe that the resolution body would be in position to structure its elucidation in the same way as an Article XX (b) dispute (Robert, 2009).11 The Nexus Requirement Pursuant to the nexus prerequisite, the resolution body is supposed to establish the superficial nature of the regulation. This is used on establishing whether the measure is an attempt of impermissibly compelling a foreign nation to take on a legislation that corresponds with the policies of the regulating country. A number of free trade supporters insist that when a nation tampers with activities that have an impact outside its territorial borders, such a country hinders the other country’s domestic rights along with export rights. As a result, the UK’s ban on importing Thailand’s orchids appears to be an unlawful undertaking of its regulatory authority12. Within Shrimp-Turtle, the Appellate body particularly evaded the subject of if Article (g) inflicts an inherent restriction on jurisdiction. In this regard, the Appellate body fundamentally that the US was allowed to prohibit imports from anglers who, when spiriting for shrimp with waters outside US jurisdiction, did not take the required precaution measures to prevent the accidental death of sea turtles. In so holding, the implication of the Appellate Body was that some form of “nexus” was needed between the regulation entity and the regulating nation. This prerequisite, nevertheless, has restricted applicability to a ban of orchids under the Article XX (a)13 exemption since the aim of this ban is to protect the public moral of UK’s own citizenry. The orchids are imported to UK, and hence UK has a direct contact with the imports that is the subject topic of the ban and hence apparently the cause of harm to public morals. Accordingly, the “nexus” prerequisite of Article XX cannot be applied here because territoriality is not a problem (Brian & Lee, 2007).14 Furthermore, the aim of UK’s import ban is not to compel other nation to change their normal standards, other than to be free to ban in its own territory the marketing of orchids which do not conform to the protection standards listed within the legislation. A regulation implied to protect public morals within a foreign state would not meet the “essential” prerequisite. However in this case, the concern is that the presence of orchids which do not fulfill the protection standards listed within the legislation is offensive to public morals in UK. UK is utilizing the import regulation to complement domestic legislation that attempts to ban all orchids from both foreign and domestic sources that do not fulfill the protection standards listed within the legislation. States have disseminated several bans basing on their authority to act as “ethical consumers” and UK’s legislation is devised in a similar way. Objective evidence supports the intent of UK, and this includes key sources like “statutes’ texts, history of legislative, as well as pronouncement of government bodies or officers (Brian & Lee, 2007)15. The Least Trade-Restrictive Measure Another aspect in the essential test is that the regulating member should implement trade measures that are least limiting in achieving its goal. The UK’s restriction is evidently a ban on importing orchids that do not fulfill the protection standards listed within the legislation; the question is if this is the least trade-limiting means possible. In this case, UK’s law provides that orchids’ importations are allowed if the required standards are met. Therefore, it is possible for UK to “successfully defend the import ban on importation of orchids from countries that do not meet the provided standards under Article XX, in this case Thailand (Brian & Lee, 2007).16 The Chapeau Requirement: No Arbitrariness or Unjustified Restriction on International Trade Supposing that the UK’s ban is perceived as an attempt of protecting public morals, and that such actions are essential, the final step of evaluating an effective invocation of Article XX is to take into consideration if the measures are applied in a way that represent a way of arbitrary or unjustifiable bias between nations where some prerequisites exist, or a disguised limitation on international trade. Conformity to the Chapeau is a separate prerequisite that should be fulfilled when applying Article XX exemption. The Chapeau is fundamentally a prerequisite that the nation enforcing the ban act in good faith (Brian & Lee, 2007).17 UK is not acting in bad faith since it does not discriminate between exporting countries; all countries are required to meet the provided standards. The first element of the Chapeau, necessitating that a nation’s measures not be “arbitrary or unjustifiable,” has to be taken into account. There exist a number of aspects that are pertinent while establishing the legitimacy of the import ban, and this include traditional communities in addition to preceding negotiations. Therefore, there is no implication that the UK was acting in bad faith against Thailand, UK government can rely on the provision of GATT Article XX to defend this trade measure (Brian & Lee, 2007).18 Conclusion UK’s ban on the importation of orchids from Thailand is entitled to a protection under Article XX (a). Trade regulations based on the life or health of the plants interests qualifies as legitimate consideration concerning public morals. Considering the broad range of concerns that have impelled import and export regulations, the preservation of life or health of the plants is evidently vital within UK. The regulation supports a domestic legislation applied for protecting UK’s own citizens’ morale; this aspect supports the requirement of such trade restraint. Lastly, the UK’s import ban is not arbitrary or unjustified because it applies to all countries that do not meet the stipulated standards and is consistent with UK’s policy priorities. Bibliography Texts Brian, A, & Lee, B. (2007). Canada Challenges Belgian Seal Ban. Embassy (Can). Robert, G. (2009). Compassionate Consumerism within the GATT Regime. California Western International Law Journal. Vol. 39. Wappriita Annual Report. (2007). Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. Annual Report. Legislations GATT, supra note 7, art. XX (a)-(b) GATT, supra note 7, at Chapeau Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Basic GATT Obligations and Exceptions

Does the GATT/WTO Agreements effectively protect the interests of the developing country members of the WTO

This research study therefore argues that although the WTO multilateral trade framework has served to reduce some trade barriers and has stimulated world trade in several sectors, the various gatt/WTO agreements have not served to protect effectively protect the interests of developing countries.... Developing countries have achieved greater access to developed countries' markets and to other developing countries' markets via the reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers as promulgated by the various agreements of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (gatt) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO)....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Critically Assess the Scope, Meaning and Relevance of Non-Discrimination in WTO Agreements

These two clauses under the guise of non-discrimination appear in some form or other in the” GATS (The General Agreement on Trade in Services), the gatt (the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), the TRIPS (the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)” and in other numerous WTOs agreements1....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

Non-discrimination is a Cornerstone of GATT Law

Although non-discrimination is a cornerstone of the GATT, some exceptions are allowed.... gatt has been revised several times; each revision is called a "round".... The latest is the "Uruguay" Round of gatt requires signatories to protect intellectual property and provide similar protection of intellectual property owned by nationals and foreigners.... to gatt has brought about numerous changes to the U.... he gatt established trade principles that continue to be applied today....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Legal Framework of the WTOs Environmental Protection Policies

Machina has filed a complaint with the WTO alleging that in both instances Agricola is breaching its WTO obligations.... The new WTO made a concrete effort to commit member states to a series of new obligations designed to facilitate free and unrestricted trade between member states emphasizing the need and desire to accommodate less developed countries.... The paper "The Legal Framework of the WTOs Environmental Protection Policies" states that the gatt Dispute Resolution Panel disagreed with the position taken by the US in response to Mexico's claim ruling that Article III referred to products and not the manner in which products were 'harvested....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

China Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials

This essay provides an in-depth discussion on the compatibility of China's export strategy at hand, with articles of GATT 1994, examining the exceptions set out in Article XX of GATT 1994 and WTO jurisprudence with regard to Article XX of GATT 1994 (WTO 9).... This is because the wording found in China's Protocol of Accession disallowed China from using the general exceptions found within Article XX of the GARR 1994.... This means that China could not use the exceptions of this Article to justify its inconsistencies with regard to WTO export duties (WTO 12)....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Non-Discrimination in WTO Agreements

It applies within the WTO agreements which operate outside the sphere of NT and MFN commitments, but also apply to phrases 'like services ', 'like products', and 'like service suppliers' which describe NT and MFN commitments under GATS and gatt.... For instance, Article XX of gatt which authorizes a Member to peruse measures incompatible with its commitments under gatt for some policy objectives obliges on the Member nations a duty not to enforce such measures 'in a style that would represent ways of unjustifiable or arbitrary differentiation between nations where the same situations exist....
14 Pages (3500 words) Dissertation

Principles of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

eneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (gatt) is a set of trade agreements that were meant to reduce tariff duties and abolish quotas among signatory countries.... The paper "Principles of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade " is an outstanding example of marketing coursework....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

International Trade Law Research

he fundamental rationales for derogation of gatt obligations under Article XX ... The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (gatt) refers to an agreement between the member countries that seeks to regulate the cross-border trade.... According to its preamble, gatt was established under the assumption of free trade achieved through considerable tariffs.... The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (gatt) refers to an agreement between the member countries that seeks to regulate the cross-border trade....
15 Pages (3750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us