StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Crimea without Harm are Harmful - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper focuses upon that no-harm crimes are harmful. Actions that are criminally prosecuted without a complaint being filed, a victim involved or occurs with the consent of all (adults) concerned is a ‘no-harm,’ public order’ or ‘victimless’ crime. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Crimea without Harm are Harmful
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Crimea without Harm are Harmful"

No-harm Crime Are Harmful I. Introduction Actions that are criminally prosecuted without a complaint being filed, a victim involved or occurs with the consent of all (adults) concerned is a ‘no-harm,’ public order’ or ‘victimless’ crime. Activities such as gambling, prostitution, pornography and drug use are, generally speaking, illegal but many would argue should not be because it does society more harm than good to prosecute people for no-harm crimes. One of the reasons concern how personal liberties are diminished in favor of society’s apparent need to legislate morality. A second involves the criminal justice system. Cases are backlogged, prisons overcrowded and law enforcement time is devoted to crimes that affect no one but the perpetrator themselves instead of crimes that do affect others. It can be argued that criminal activity increases when laws designed to dictate morality are enforced. In addition, the legitimacy of the entire justice system is in question due to the hypocrisy of no-harm laws. Thirdly, no-harm crimes are the invention of the majority race and disproportionately targets minorities. No-harm crimes do great harm, more so than they prevent. II. Harms of No-harm Simply because society is offended by an action or considers it immoral behavior, such as prostitution, does not mean the conduct should be prohibited by law. It’s no one else’s business what occurs between two consenting adults. On the other hand, prostitution leads to the spreading of disease which is a societal concern. Where does society draw the line between liberty and public interest? That’s the debate. Some say the participants in crimes such as this may hurt themselves and no one else but that is countered by those who say not all prostitutes are willing, that legalizing it leads to young girls being held as sex slaves in cities all around the world. Additionally, the act harms family members of the perpetrators. While all these arguments against legalizing prostitution are true, they are not valid, at least not in the context of the prevailing legal standard. Families are harmed by many actions such as an unwise monetary investments or negligence on the job that leads to termination and loss of income. Feeding children fast foods does harm to both the child and a society that must pay more in healthcare costs connected to diabetes and obesity. If prostitution were legal it could be regulated and taxed. Workers would be licensed, not enslaved in addition to being checked once per week for diseases. The moral arguments are inconsistent with norms of society. a. Biased Law, Biased Enforcement No-harm crimes are racially biased. It may not be the intention but has consistently been the case in practice. Those who influence and make laws are typically white and middle to upper class individuals. Those most affected by these laws tend to be poor minorities. The majority of prostitutes and their clients who go to jail are poor or lower-middle income. They are the streetwalkers. However, if a man of means rents an apartment for a “girlfriend” and visits her on lunch break it’s perfectly legal. Higher class brothels catering to mainly white Wall Street clients are not subject to the same scrutiny. Drug laws have been criticized as being racist because “the penalties have disproportionately affected African Americans, as their incarceration rates have risen dramatically relative to white drug users” (Bobo and Thompson, 2006). Homeless persons can be arrested for vagrancy or, in many communities, just for not having a home. Laws are meant not to help the homeless but to drive them away to other towns. A homeless man and a wealthy man could be “loitering” in a park when a policeman walks up. The one with a disheveled appearance will be questioned and possibly arrested due to no-harm laws. It is widely perceived that these laws apply only to the poor and powerless. Some goes as far as suggesting victimless crimes are thinly veiled racism. The evidence supports this sentiment. b. Drug Problem The criminal justice system itself is a victim of victimless crime laws. Drug possession laws, as an example, contribute greatly to overcrowded prisons and overburdened courts. A growing number of people are claiming it should be the violent criminals, the “animals” who are kept in cages not those who cause no-harm to others. Violent criminals are paroled early due to overcrowding. They are sent back out into society a hardened; unreformed threat to all they encounter. If drug possession were not illegal, there would be room in prisons for those who do harm to serve their entire sentence. Whatever portion of a police department sources are spent tracking down and arresting drug users could be spent preventing “real crimes,” ones that causes harms to others. “There is concern that enforcement of victimless crime laws may divert time and funds for the criminal justice system from other more serious crime and more important issues.” (Taylor, 2001). c. Credibility Factor No-harm laws can be applied subjectively by police officers therefore may encourage corruption to some degree. All policemen would arrest a burglary suspect but some might overlook a guy discreetly smoking marijuana in his own fenced backyard or his neighbors playing nickel-ante poker in the garage. The officer may even join in (the poker game). These laws are constructed based on the morality of a certain group at a certain time in history. Times change and not law enforcement officials, from cops to district attorneys to judges are guided by the same moral compass, at least not precisely. These laws are not and cannot be enforced equally creating a credibility factor. The overreaching laws also, according to some, impede personal liberties and the very concept of freedom, a viewpoint that diminishes the respect for the justice system as a whole. “These laws are difficult to enforce, since they are usually not even reported, and provide goods and services that are in demand. As such, the laws are likely to be violated, weakening law abiding behaviors.” (Veneziano, 2012). Because no-harm laws are often associated with corruption within police departments and organized crime involvement, the entire legal process suffers from a negative public perception. d. Organized Crime Gambling, prostitution and drugs are simply goods and services for which a substantial demand exists. Because they are illegal the market must be driven “underground” in an effort to escape detection. Organized crime thrives in this environment, a circumstance which heightens the opportunity for police corruption. No-harm crimes actually encourage criminal activity. The war on drugs was lost 30 years ago but billions dollars more have been spent since then while thousands more have been killed from drug gang violence and untold numbers of lives ruined due to having a police record. Alcohol prohibition should have set the example for what not to do. Police busted barrel of liquor, bootleggers were arrested and bars were shut down. People still drank but they bought from criminals. Organized crime grew immensely during prohibition and has made a strong resurgence during the prohibition of drugs. If protecting the public were really the motive then tobacco would be illegal and marijuana sold in every convenience store. It’s just another inconsistency in the law, another reason to lose respect for the legal process, the guiding force of democracy and foundation for society and the nation. (Veneziano, 2012). III. Counter Argument Proponents of keeping no-harms laws often claim that if drug sales and prostitution infiltrate a neighborhood following legalization, the crime in that area will increase while property values decrease. Liquor stores are seldom seen in the more affluent neighborhoods. The parts of town that encourage questionable behaviors encourage more serious types of crime. The evidence is in every city. If so called “no-harm” activities are sanctioned by the law, drug shops, house of prostitution and gambling halls will increase dramatically and along with it more crime, the more harmful type. “Disorder and victimless acts should be discouraged so as to protect neighborhoods and residents.” (Veneziano, 2012). Conclusion While laws prohibiting victimless activities were enacted for a reason, there are many more reasons to decriminalize them. Homosexuality used to be a crime as did interracial marriage. These were and are victimless crimes but offended a certain group’s sense of morality and decency. People sounded the alarm against legalizing both saying these behaviors would spread throughout society. They were right but the fact remains - they do no-harm. In a liberty loving country, it is inconsistent to criminalize actions that affect no one but consenting adults, in other words, are nobody’s business. Most agree with this principle whatever side of the no-harm discussion they are on. The laws are hypocritical and make a mockery of the justice system. Laws are what tie a people and culture together. Without the Constitution there is no country. When the people of a country no longer respect its laws, the validity of those laws along with the collective perception of country itself is diminished. No-harm laws are harmful to the individual, the justice system and the country as a whole. Works Cited Meier, R.F. & Geis, G. Victimless crime? Prostitution, Drugs, Homosexuality, Abortion. Los Angeles: Roxbury Press. 1997. Taylor, R. Getting tough on crime: What does it mean? Free Inquiry, 21 (3), 32–33. 2001. Bobo, L.D. & Thompson, V. Unfair by design: The war on drugs, race and the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Social Research, 73 (2), 445-474. 2006. Veneziano, Carol A. Ph.D. Victimless Crimes. Southeast Missouri State University. January 9, 2012. Web. November 10, 2012 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Crimea without Harm are Harmful Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Crimea without Harm are Harmful Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1786941-anything-related-to-criminal-justice
(Crimea Without Harm Are Harmful Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Crimea Without Harm Are Harmful Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1786941-anything-related-to-criminal-justice.
“Crimea Without Harm Are Harmful Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1786941-anything-related-to-criminal-justice.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Crimea without Harm are Harmful

The Production and Sale of Cigarettes Should Be Made Illegal

This simply means that cigarettes could not be far from potential harmful chemicals used by criminals to annihilate their subjects' lives.... Just as criminals are confined behind bars for committing crimes associated with killing particularly poisoning their targets, manufacturing cigarettes that in the end would just result to the harm of one's life may simply be a form of crime in that same sense.... without question, there must be wonderful feeling or benefits linked to smoking, which particularly has become the major point why there are still many people who smoke and continue to do so even if they already knew the health hazards associated to it....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Conviction of Crimes

Majewski [1977 AC 433] Majewski was accused of causing bodily harm to members of a pub.... Motive may be defined as the reason behind a given course of action.... Motive is an explanation as to why a given party will form the intent to break law or commit crime.... In criminal law, one will not get punished if it has been proven that they have the motive to commit a crime....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Hey Neighbour, Stop piggybacking on my Wireless by M. Marriott

Although some people purposely leave an open connection, it is unsafe to assume that no harm will be done by other people who use open connections.... Admittedly, Piggybacking, the act of using another's Wi-Fi, without the knowledge of the owner, is an everyday occurrence....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Uncompleted crime

If the purpose of the agreement is harmful to the public or cause fraud, the valid charge can be provided in the court of laws.... New York is an appropriate State to base our research on conspiracy of crime.... Conspiracy of crime is evident in New York statute law where the… In the original common law, the crime of conspiracy was not rigid and settled since it would grow infinitely as it would accommodate new situations and various actions would be criminalized if they had adverse effects on the society Article 105 of the Penal Law of New York contains the conspiracy of crime....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Advantages of Modern Technology in Buildings Safety

The three mentioned advantages will be discussed in details so as to divulge and reveal what role exactly technology plays in protecting lives of people and reducing risks of harm and danger.... Such buildings require effective technological channels tools installed in them that can help dispose these wastes without causing harm to people.... Human safety comes first and this is the reason why all efforts must be made to ensure people who are accommodated in any building are secure and free from harm....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Assault, Battery, and Crimes against Persons

The elements of battery are that an act with intent to cause harmful or offensive contact to the victim (Gardner & Anderson, 2012).... Assault occurs when the attacker jumps from the alley and cause apprehension of harmful and offensive contact... The definition of assault is a threat of bodily harm to a victim that reasonably causes fear to them while battery refers to the actual physical impact on another person.... ?In assault, the victim need not be touched but only threatened, while in battery the victim must be touched… According to common law, assault and battery can be a misdemeanor or a felony and the charge of an assault and battery case is decided by the severity of harm caused. The most essential elements of an There is no assault if the act does not produce a true fear of harm that is reasonable in the victim....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

The Law of Violence

Throughout, the law treated the threat of physical injury as assault while the battery was considered the complete contact to cause harm.... This work called "The Law of Violence" describes the facts and circumstances surrounding assault.... The author takes into account penalties and sentencing for assault, the enacting of the laws for the offenses, actions prosecuted as domestic abuse or violence....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Freedom of Speech in Digital Age

Everyone is entitled to hold and express their opinions freely without any interference.... The paper "Freedom of Speech in Digital Age" proved initially the Internet brought the impression that freedom of speech would be upheld.... But this changed through mass surveillance.... Although the latter helps the authorities in preventing crimes, it violates freedom of speech....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us