StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Property Land Law: Analyis of the Case of the Hillside and Coventry Properties - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The "Property Land Law: Analysis of the Case of the Hillside and Coventry Properties" paper focuses on the case in which Frederick, owner of the two properties with fee simple interests, mortgaged and consequently sold to Marjorie, Lucille, and Bernie…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Property Land Law: Analyis of the Case of the Hillside and Coventry Properties
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Property Land Law: Analyis of the Case of the Hillside and Coventry Properties"

Felix S. Cohen suggests that property is about relationships between people. He writes, "Property depends upon exclusion by law from interference identifying the right of exclusion as an essential characteristic of property rights. Thus, an individual's proprietary interest will depend on his ability, as accorded by law, to dispose of his property as he sees fit and prevent others from enjoying or utilizing it. However, proprietary interests can be fragmented among a number of individuals or groups over different levels, making the ability to exclude others more difficult and confusing, oftentimes leading to property disputes. In Western Australia, such problems become more confusing because of two existing systems of land ownership. The case of the Hillside and Coventry properties is an example where Frederick, owner of the two properties with fee simple interests, mortgaged and consequently sold to Marjorie, Lucille, and Bernie. This left the parties with competing interests, thus calling for the need to determine whose interest is greater and what each party can do to create an interest in the aforementioned properties. According to the Old System, upon which Hillside is initially registered under, Marjorie, upon entering into a contract with Frederick possess an equitable interest in the property. However, because she did not receive the deed to the property, this did not make the mortgage legal. The fact that the deeds were not transferred to her did not complete the transfer, which she should have had a right to under the old system. Nevertheless, her equitable interest remains, granting her a security interest in the land to ensure that Frederick complies with his obligation, Lucille's interest, however, as second mortgagee is quite interesting. Although she is the second mortgagee in the property, she has both equitable and legal interests. The Old System of Mortgage, upon which the Hillside property is registered, prevents more than one mortgage for a particular property. This is because according to the Old System, upon conveyance of a mortgage, "the mortgagee prima facie is entitled to take possession as soon as the mortgage has been executed," 2 provided that the mortgagee exercises strict caution in possessing the property. Hence, there cannot be two legal mortgages over a single property. This, however, does not apply because in Lucille's case, although her mortgage happened subsequent to Marjorie's mortgage, the legal interest was not transferred to Marjorie because Frederick kept the deeds and gave them to Lucille. In this sense, Lucille has the legal interest in the property. However, it is important to determine whether there has been a conveyance of properties. The case only mentioned Frederick giving the deeds of the property to Lucille. If such can be considered a conveyance of the deeds, she possesses the legal interest. On the contrary, if there was no conveyance of deeds, her interest remains equitable. Both Lucille and Marjorie's interests are subject to the equity of redemption3. Thus, although a transfer was made based on the Old System, Frederick still retains certain interests in the property, including the right to redeem it, provided that he complies with his obligations. With regard to Bernie, his interest depends on whether there was a conveyance of deeds and the legal interests were transferred to Lucille. Assuming that Frederick's legal interests were transferred to Lucille by virtue of the mortgage, Bernie possesses only an equitable interest in Hillside based on the equity of redemption, which Frederick retained upon the mortgage. This is because at the time the sale took place, Frederick did not have a legal interest in the property to sell to Bernie by virtue of the mortgage. Hence, Bernie will only possess a legal interest after the mortgage is paid off and redeems his rights from Lucille. Between Lucille and Marjorie, Lucille's interest takes priority because she conducted the legal mortgage, hence possessing a legal interest. Between Lucille and Bernie, Lucille's interest also takes priority, at least at least for the duration of the mortgage, until the obligations for the mortgage are fulfilled and Bernie redeems the legal interest for the property, whereby his interests will then take priority. However, upon registering the Hillside property under s. 58 of the Transfer of Land Act (TLA), crucial changes occur. Section 58 of the TLA states that: No instrument until registered in manner herein provided shall be effectual to pass any estate or interest in any land under the operation of this Act or to render such land liable to any mortgage or charge; but upon such registration the estate or interest comprised in the instrument shall pass or as the case may be the land shall become liable in manner and subject to the covenants and conditions set forth and specified, as the case required.4 Consequently, the aforementioned passage in sec.58 requires all transactions regarding the transfer, sale, mortgage, and any other dealings regarding land to be registered first before they can be recognized. This has a significant effect in the effectiveness of a legal interest because unless a legal interest is registered, it will remain to be an equitable interest. As a result, Bernie's registration under sec.58 of the TLA altered the relationships and interests of the concerned parties. With regard to Lucille's interest as a mortgagee and the transfer of legal interest and possession by virtue of the legal mortgage, her rights to the land and legal interest changes. First, her legal interest in the property is no longer recognized under dec.58 of the TLA because her mortgage agreement has yet to be registered. Consequently, she only possesses an equitable interest. Thus, Marjorie's equitable interest by virtue of the mortgage, therefore takes priority over Lucille's equitable interest because it took place first. Furthermore, her mortgage also takes priority because it is recognized by sec.58 of the TLA due to registration. Thus, with regard to Lucille and Marjorie's competing equitable interests, Marjorie's interest not takes priority because it was registered first. In addition to such changes in the two parties' interests, changes also occur over their respective mortgages. First, the mortgagees no longer have the right of possession by virtue of the Old System. Under the TLA, the mortgagees can only enter the land (sec.78), foreclose the mortgage (sec.79), and sell the land in the instance that the mortgagor fails to fulfill his obligations (sec.77). As a result, the rights of the mortgagees, Lucille and Marjorie, are diminished from having the prima facie entitlement to take possession, to simply having the land for security. Consequently, Bernie's interests, upon registering the land, therefore take priority. First, unlike the Old System where mortgagees have the right to possess the land until the mortgage is settled, the rights of the mortgagee under the TLA is diminished and limited to serve only as a security interest. Thus, Bernie, despite the existence of the mortgage, now possesses both legal and equitable interests in the land. The conveyance of legal interests to Lucille (provided that the transfer did take place) is no longer recognized under the TLA, allowing Bernie to have legal interests by virtue of his registration. With regard to Jade and Bernie, the two parties both have competing interests over Coventry, which is already registered under TLA. In this case, Bernie has only an equitable interest because he is unable to register the transfer of the property to his name due to the caveat placed by Jade. On the other hand, Jade's interest is also of question. According to The principle of Milord v Lord 5 it is imperative that the grantor - Frederick - has done all that is necessary to be done to transfer the property. In Jade's case, Frederick did not accomplish all that is necessary to complete the gift. Thus, Jade should only have an equitable interest in Coventry. However, since she was able to successfully register the property, this gives her a legal interest, which is protected by a caveat. Jade and Bernie therefore have prior legal interest competing with an equitable interest. Based on the interests possessed by Jade and Bernie, one can easily conclude that Jade's interest should take priority because it took place before that of Bernie. However, the conduct at which the gift of land was given to Jade by Frederick calls for further analysis. First, the title to the deed still lies with Frederick. Based on the principle of Milord v. Lord, a gift cannot be completed until the deed of the property is passed on to the recipient of the gift. Thus, Jade's legal interest is in question. Furthermore, it was Jade, the recipient of the gift who accomplished the transfer instead of Frederick. Lastly, Frederick's actions of initially trying to develop the property, mortgage it, and eventually sell calls for the need to question whether or not the gift was really intended. Thus, the aforementioned reasons indicate Bernie's interest in Coventry should prevail because the manner that Jade came to own the land is questionable, although not necessarily fraudulent. Word Count: 1,489 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Property Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Property Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1514977-property-land-law
(Property Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Property Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1514977-property-land-law.
“Property Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1514977-property-land-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Property Land Law: Analyis of the Case of the Hillside and Coventry Properties

Hillside School Case Study

hillside school case study Name Instructor Task Date Introduction Billing system is fundamental in enhancing process re-engineering and management of operations in institutions.... It is an IT driven system that institutions with strong growth orientation for example; hillside school should adopt to leverage performance and accountability in diverse areas of operation.... hillside school case study Task Introduction Billing system is fundamental in enhancing process re-engineering and management of operations in institutions....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Land Law and the Properties

This essay "Land Law and the Properties" focuses on the case scenario that indicates that Bill is now in arrears with the repayments of a loan that was secured over his property.... From the case study, it is obvious that the former occupant (Geraldine) of the No.... and Law: Case Studies the case scenario indicates that Bill is now in arrears with the repayments of a loan which was secured over his property.... If the given scenario is related to Scotland or Northern Ireland, and if the property is the home owned by Bill, then the section 40 of the 1985 Act will be applicable to the case....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Property Law Degree Case Study

This method involves an Inspector hearing both sides of the case, both in verbal and written form, as well as commentary from third parties.... he case of Regan v.... Also, depending upon what kind of housing is to be built, the value of their own properties could be negatively impacted.... Paul properties Ltd.... Regan attempted to prevent Paul properties Ltd.... To begin to understand the complexities of the legal realm in terms of property law, it is useful to investigate what might happen in this hypothetical situation. ...
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Analysis of Property Law Case

Crane and there is no special law that applies in the case of property shared by cohabitees, although the Law Commission has recommended property rights for separating cohabiting couples on par with divorcing married couples8. ... Lord Justice Grant stated in the case of Grant v Edwards10 that when a party has not made a contribution to the purchase price and no written agreement exists, the party must demonstrate that a common intention existed for a beneficial interest to ensue....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Property Law: Analysis of the Property Rights

On the other hand, the case of Mrs.... n the case of Midland Bank Trust Company Limited and Another v.... n the case of Hodgson v.... n the case of National Provincial Bank v.... The difference between Dave and Bob is that in the case of Dave, there was no way that that Peter could have known of the existence of Dave's lease of the garage because the garage at that time was not being used and occupied by Dave....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Property Law Cases

Lord Scarman asserted ion the case of Trippass v Tripass that “the complete flexibility of approach that the act….... A prime example of this is the case of Eves v Eves18, where the defendant told the claimant that the only reason the house was being put in his sole name was as she was under 21.... or example, in the case of Hussey v Palmer20, the wife had paid for an extension to the house and it was held to constitute a beneficial interest, however the court had great difficulty in deciding whether it was a resulting trust or constructive trust, thereby highlighting the inherent flaw in artificial legal distinctions....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Analysis of Property Law Cases

So the option is not applicable here according to the case of Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green5.... (2005), Modern land law, 5th edition, Cavendish Publishing Limited, pp-29-101 ... ackson N,(2008), Overreaching in Registered land law, University of Manchester - School of Law, available at: < http://papers.... ray & Gray, (2006), Elements of land law, 4th edition, Oxford University Press, pp-38 ... & Turner C, (2008), Unlocking land law, 1st edition, Hodder &Stoughton....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Property and Housing Law

or example, in the case of Aslan v Murphy13, the occupier was made to vacate the premises for 90 minutes every day and the owner retained a key on the pretence of cleaning the room and providing bed linen.... In order for a lease to be valid, the case of Lace v Chantler18 asserts that it must be for a determinable period (in the case of periodic tenancies/recurring tenancies) or a specified period of time, which in the current scenario is specified as being for a period of five years....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us