Violent Vigilantism - Essay Example

Violent Vigilantism From the past centuries, vigilante violence that results in murder for the defense of oneself or others is an act of prosecution and is seen as a dangerous threat in countries around the world. Looking into countries from Eastern Africa and South Asia is where police face various challenges keeping these crimes under control. A murder violates a social norm because of its extreme behavior and deviant punishment and is seen as an act of justice within third world countries like Nairobi and Bangladesh where violence there is highly tolerated. These dangerous perpetrated acts have influenced more murders, including murder against atheists for their absurd and religious motives and beliefs. Extrajudicial executions and torture are under conditions of religions clashes and at attempts of prohibition by the federal government. Damage and vandalization go without the highest order of punishment. Murder is seen as a threatening violence in all countries that have an approach in targeting minorities and religious groups. Is murder in a scene of justice morally the wrong approach between life and death and if so why? Vigilantism violates a social norm when someone commits a murder, because that person who acts as a vigilante can incite more violence in multiple countries around the world. In vigilante justice, murder violates social norms because not only is it bad judgment but is also the wrong act of executing justice. Murder within circumstances can influence more murderous danger by rage, emotional disturbance, and trigger a formidable clash of its people. In the scholarly article Street Crime by Fatami Saraj, she writes on a story that made headlines in Bangladesh on a boy that attempted to steal a rickshaw but was added to a horror show that involved a group of people tying him to a pole and harassing him, eventually beating him to death. There was a video of this posted on social media that sparked giant protests and involved thirteen more murders due to the outrageous atrocities. When you commit an act like this, you don’t know if there could be people watching and filming. Religious clashes against groups like atheists are an example of the type of violence that a lot of people don’t know to happen in multiple countries across the world. Attacks by Islamic extremists have risen in Bangladesh within the last several years on Buddhists, Christians, and on Shias. Siraj points out a good perspective of how inflicting pain and violence can trigger the most disturbed wanting to hurt. This happens everywhere, even in the United States. Society is liable to fall into the shaft of savagery and moral decay. The ones that are punished, including children, are killed and shatter the hearts of others, not even family. What’s makes the incident even more terrifying is that people were cheering and laughing while this was happening. A quote from the source Street justice, “Spurred by the words and actions of anyone who disagrees with their beliefs, these fanatics look to kill. Four atheist bloggers have been killed just this year alone.” (Street Justice pg. 1) Violent Vigilantism is widely perpetuated In Vigilante Justice, murder violates a social norm because of its morals that violate social factors. In the comic Luke Cage: Sins of the father, the main character Cage is a hero in one of its kind. He simply sees murder as an ineffective and horrendous act that violates his morals. Warhawk is more of a good example with trying to resist his killing motives. In the third part of the book, Cage tells Warhawks, “No Killing! Let’s do this nice and peaceful like.” Warhawks then goes off on gang members in New Orleans. A quote that points out Warhawk’s calmness to his frustration talks about his confusion of whether to kill or not. Warhawk speaks, “I get confused sometimes. I can’t… what’s the word… focus. But I get angry…then I can focus. No confusion. Just anger. That’s when I kill. It’s the only time I’m not confused-the only sense of…not focus…what’s the word?” (n.pag) He is hooked up to a lie detecting machine when he answers these questions. He remarks Dr. Burstein saying I ca n’t stop killing. He says, “the world has gone to hell, and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it…” Why this character is a more focused dialogue is because he’s more of a violent vigilant character that is seen within all of the comics like Batman, The reader sees him as someone who kills to seek revenge or as someone who just can’t control their self. Cage tries to stop him when Warhawks threatens to kill him as well. Cage won’t kill him so he’s not the focus in this argument. Warhawk is the main threat and this shows you why even Cage believes it morally wrong to kill. Murder violates a social norm because of its compelling attraction to dangerous people that can provoke further violence creating an epidemic. South Africa’s brutal crime epidemic escalated in a deadly effect since 1994, the end of Apartheid. Racial politics stimulated the rise of violence between white minorities and black minorities. White security and privilege cultivated violence including vigilantism and communal conflict within the black communities. Tens of thousands of murders took place on South African soil between the mid-nineties and the mid thousands. A hijacked civil society repressed racial policing inducing social conflict resulting in murder and civil oppression throughout the times in the late twentieth century. A leftist death culture residing in the South African nation leads the highest rates of rape in the world with forty-seven murders a day in 2013, under President Jacob Zuma. In Gail Super’s article called, Volatile Sovereignty: Governing Crime through the community in Khayelitsha, due to the ineffective state in South Africa, high rate crimes and violence has emerged highly in Africa’s black townships. They believe it’s the only way to solve the crisis unfolding there. With this logic, the building blocks of society fall to pieces due to the problematic relationships between its people and the state. In addition, killings create a negative image that impacts more people in a society, prompts fear, and propelled irrational citizens to unleash anger. Murder serves as a more prestigious and revengeful act of justice against the so-called enemy in civilian life. This happens today in Africa’s most populous countries which capture a ruptured, ridden image. Violent vigilantism strengthens the argument of why murder violates social norms in places like South Asia and Africa are great examples as to why violence incites more violence among individuals and why it’s a negative social factor to protect their citizens. Vigilantism has become an endemic feature of the Nigerian social and political landscape. Murder incites resentment often reinforcing vengefulness. In the Introduction the Politics of Protection, “In any case, perhaps the greatest significance of support for vigilantism is the ability to create an environment that condones and justifies the practice.” (247) The latest forms of insurgent violence and protection provide a view of microcosm within simultaneous trends on insecurity, the nature of citizenship, and on the failing of the state. Vigilantism violates a social norm when someone commits a murder, because that person can incite more violence, looked like more of a threat, and why it could be considered morally wrong. Read More