Writing Today by Richard Johnson and Charles Paine – Essay Example

The paper "Writing Today by Richard Johnson and Charles Paine" is a delightful example of an essay on literature. Arguments are unique types of writing whose primary objective is to influence the mindset of others. Writing arguments are, therefore, a tedious process that requires effective considerations and presentations of the facts and opinions that inform a particular argument. The chapter discusses strategic ways of designing, informing, presenting and revising written arguments. The process is progressive often beginning with the invention of the contents of an argument. Successive subsections of the chapter discuss various ways of ensuring the effectiveness of an argument. In developing the chapter, the authors use various social scenarios and arguments thereby developing a lively and functional guide to the process of writing effective arguments. Among the examples the authors use in the chapter is a case in which a student argues that “Allowing Guns on Campus will Prevent Shootings, Rape”. In analyzing the features of the student’s arguments, the authors assert that the viability of any opinion in an argument relies on the ability of an individual to present his facts and back them effectively. Arguments on prevailing social issues elicit immense interests. Such arguments, therefore, require the adequate provision of evidence to corroborate the arguments. The evidence may include statistics and existing cases among many others. Additionally, effective communication skills are vital in enhancing arguments. The authors opine that the use of simple sentence structures is vital since it enhances the understanding of the facts presented in the argument.  Researching on the topical issue exhaustively ensures that one obtains the necessary facts with which to back his arguments. After writing the argument in a particular style and in the presentation of a specific opinion, revision and proofreading the final write up are essential in eliminating typographical errors that may deter the effectiveness of the argument.