Texas Law about the New Students - Essay Example

Should Texas Law allow new students or transfer students at public colleges and universities to drop more than six classes during their entire undergraduate studies? Name: Institution: Introduction In January 2008, a law in Texas took effect to restrict the number of courses that undergraduate students are allowed to drop in the period of their learning. The fresh rule does not permit fresh students or relocate students at colleges and universities that are civic to drop classes that are not more than six in the course of their complete undergraduate studies. The reason for this rule is to give inspiration to students so that they can finish their courses. As a result, students cannot change their majors as regularly as they did in the earlier period. Additionally, the rule supports the quick graduation of students. Also, the rule decreases the amount of arrears for student loans. For this reason, the rule is debatable. This context therefore illustrates why I agree with the new Texas rule that does not allow fresh students or transfer students at civic colleges and university to drop classes not more than six in the course of their entire undergraduate courses. A number of people disagree with the Texas rule of dropping six classes at most. They feel that students should study what they want. This should be right if the school is paying 100% of the bill. Parents pay taxes to the nation and they also pay college education. Therefore children have all the right to decide their course of learning and if not, the citizens of the great nation are not supporting the right they paid for which is to choice of own education, and like the tyrants the world over, the regime is gradually deciding each person’s destiny. Parents pay a lot of money to finance their children’s education; therefore it is just natural for them to complain about the limitation of the course drop. I disagree with those who oppose; the rules and regulations are very essential in every institution including higher learning institutions. This will guide the institution to achieve its major goal which is to encourage students to complete their courses and graduate in the scheduled time. The law makes students to carefully select their courses before commencing their classes. To attain this, learning institutions provide academic advisors to guide students on their selection. When students experience problems with their courses, it is advisable that they seek advice from their respective academic advisors. Some people who disagree with the law say that the Texas law is somehow trying to save the money of the state by fining students at college and universities for change of classes. If the political of the state were concerned with saving capital, they would repair the streets and the highways which may last for a period of sixty days. The politics should question their policies for the system of education which keeps the teachers and students dumb down. When students fail their courses, they finally drop. The institution then fines them, which is quite unfair because they should just drop the course before failing. I disagree with this because; the policy regulates the use of money within the institution. States aid fund their civic colleges. Therefore it is fair for the colleges and the universities to limit the duration that students spend in the learning institutions, and to achieve this, they are entitled to limit the number of courses that they drop. After all when the drop is limited, students become focused towards course completion, which is a positive factor. Completion of course in the specified time and timely graduation will be beneficial to students in the future. Others who disagree with the Texas law argue that, the law will make the students who are affected to relocate to other states, and dropping out of college for a year if they do not pass their classes in Texas. It is good to allow students to try and fail and not limit them on the courses they should drop. For instance, if a student wants to be a doctor and he or she may not possess the potential, he eventually fails and drops the course. Students do not want to fail, so they are not trying. Forcing students to drop a specific number of courses sounds like a political game whereby parents are now forced to take their children to private colleges and universities. I disagree with this since students who receive the benefits of dropping classes utilize them well and in a responsible way. Although, it can happen that a number of students may drop several classes. Therefore it is fair to draw a line someplace within this issue. Despite the fact that some students are funded by the state and the federal funding, they need to complete their courses on time so that they can provide room for other upcoming students who want to join the university and colleges. There are reasons why I agree with the rule. A number of people support the law of Texas towards the limit of number of classes that should be dropped since they feel it is helpful. This is because universities and colleges expect students to finish their courses and graduate in an appropriate time. It strongly supports undergraduates to set their objectives to finish their degrees in a period of four years, and in some situations, in a period not exceeding six years. Undergraduates who dedicate themselves and make a number of sacrifices by putting much concentration to their academic efforts to attain well-timed graduation will appreciate considerable advantages in the future. Therefore the law is suitable in its objective to fulfill the goal of encouraging students to complete their courses and graduate on the scheduled time. When institutions implement their rules and regulations, they achieve a sense of direction. The same applies to the rule of dropping not more than six classes in a specified time because students are able to devote themselves towards hard work and complete their course. Although some courses are very hard, students are encouraged to complete them because they will make them fit in the competitive world of economy. However, others may be irrelevant towards the choice of course. Every college-level classes dropped following the certified drop date and add time are incorporated in the six course restriction, including classes dropped at a different Texas civic university, unless the intension for dropping meet the requirements for an exception. This happens when there is an acute illness or other purposeful condition that interferes with the ability of the student to suitably complete the classes, the student’s duty for the care of an ailing, injured or deprived individual if the terms of that care obstructs the ability of the student to suitably finish the course, the passing away of an individual who is regarded as a member of the student’s kin or who is otherwise regarded as a satisfactorily close relative to the student. Special consideration is also given when there is alteration in the work schedule of the student that exceeds the power of the student and that has an effect on the student’s capacity to adequately complete the classes. When exceptions are given to the students with either of the above problems, they are encouraged to complete their courses as they feel cared for. When these students are given these chances, they work harder to achieve their intended goals in academics. For example, there is a student who had to drop her classes because she suffered a mental problem and could not complete her classes in the intended time but due to the support she got from the university advisory board and fellow students, she was able to complete her classes. Many people who support this law say that states assist public colleges through funding. For instance, there is a college that is financed 50% by state and national funds. Occasionally students drop a number of classes that exceed six. This would cost the tariff payers money as tariff payers paid for half or further of that course group and did not get the anticipated result school credit, hours got toward a degree. In Texas, individuals who have considerable visual or hearing damage are given the right to free education in Texas civic colleges. This is fine, because almost 99% of the students who get these advantages make proper use of them. However, these students may drop a lot of classes. I back up this idea, even if it permitted scholars to continue at the same institution but have their training augmented to an amount approximated not inclusive of state and centralized funding. Due to economic hardship that the states face occasionally, spending more money on individual students who drop classes is not fair. Therefore should students should also complete their classes so that they are not given penalties regarding course drops. The intention of this rule is to provide motivation to students to finish their courses. Additionally, the rule encourages scholars to graduate more rapidly. Also, the rule decreases the amount of arrears for student credits. Conclusion In conclusion, the context has illustrated how some people disagree with the Texas law towards the dropping of classes in the higher learning institutions. However, others strongly agree with the rule. For instance, some who disagree argue that the law is just a political game since the state aids in funding the public universities and colleges, and hence might result to parents taking their children to private higher institutions of learning which are quite costly than the public ones. On the other hand, I support the law as it encourages students to complete their courses on time, which is the objective of the university. The law also provides exemption to students with special needs. The issue should be resolved because students should appreciate the value of this law. I believe this issue will be resolved because rules are there to guide an institution. Read More