The paper “ Talented Students - Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent” is a motivating variant of essays on education. Many people have not known the importance of handling gifted students with care. In fact gifted students should be given special attention as they have a character that is somehow different from the one that rests of the students do. They usually show exceptional interests in a given field and they can as well perform in a better way. Teachers should a special program meant to ensure that special students are not mismanaged as they can end up losing what they are best in life.
On the other hand, it is important to note that in the case they are not well handled, they might be a problem to other students or they may end up losing self-esteem and not explore their talent to the very end. However, if they can be well handled, they will be the best people who will propel the country to the next level due to the talent that they portray. To ensure that talent is well managed, it is important to have a well-described procedure in which one can manage the whole process.
Models have been developed one of these models is Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). It is used to guide individuals on how to manage talent. It indicates the various steps one can undergo to ensure that talent is well managed. There are five steps through which an individual can achieve these. There are five components in this model they include; Gifts (G), Talents (T), Talent development process (D), The I and E catalysts.
These are best in talent development (Gagné , 2008). In general there is a need to ensure that children who are talented should be handled with a lot of care. They should be treated as individuals who are required special needs. Building a talent requires dedication from the parents and teachers. There should be mutual support from both parties to ensure any young person is doing well in what he/she is gifted with. Several schools have come with programs that are meant to ensure that programs that will identify and nature the students are in place.
This effective moment should be the once that can be encouraged in the bid of ensuring that everything is moving in the right direction. It is important to understand the programs must conform to the modern needs of talent management. Great lead leaders and professionals can be built if talented students are natured well. There are cases in the world that great talents have not been recognized until when it’ s late. This may be due to the failure of the systems in place that does not give attention to the students at their early stages.
In fact if a great talent is not given due care, it may be seen as an abnormality. Someone may be the best student in a given field let us say technology but when it comes to classwork, he/she may be the word. If due consideration may not be taken, it will be difficult for such an individual to be taken care of and be helped in achieving his talent. In this paper we will discuss various aspects related to the gifted students (Smith, 2015).
Clark, B. (2007). Growing up gifted (7th ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Davis, G., Rimm, S., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Gagné, F. (2008). Building gifts into talents: Overview of the DMGT. http://www.eurotalent.org/Gagne_DMGT_Model.pdf
Heacox, D., & Cash, R. M. (2014). Differentiation for gifted learners: Going beyond the basics. Minneapolis, MA: Free Spirit Publishers.
Jarvis, J.M. (2014). Supporting Diverse Gifted Students, In M. Hyde, L. Carpenter, & Conway, R, (Eds.) Diversity, Inclusion, and Engagement 2nd Ed. (p.297-‐316),
Jarvis, J.M. (2015). Inclusive classrooms and differentiation. In Weatherby-Fell, Noelene, ed. Learning to Teach in the Secondary School. Port Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154-171.
Smith, S. R. (2015). A dynamic differentiation framework for talent enhancement: Findings from syntheses and teachers'