The paper “ Computer Forensic Tools Test Method” is an excellent example of an essay on information technology. The Control Process on the methods of testing conducted for Computer Forensic Tools is extremely important in ensuring that justice grinds to its foolproof efficacy through the aid of modern forensics. The need to magnify the tools employed in the testing and methodology for computer forensic comes to a fore. Historically, “ … The use of medical testimony in law cases predates by more than 1,000 years the first systematic presentation of the subject by the Italian Fortunatos Fidelis in 1598.
Forensic medicine was recognized as a specialty early in the 19th century. ..” ( Encyclopedia Britanica, 1990). It had seen its growth variably from the barest necessity to the more appropriate technology of the modern times. Note the inroads of forensic from the centuries-old application to the advent of scientific-based correlation of computer forensics. Presently, computer forensic is on its toes as can be gleaned in different levels of laboratory testing. The advent of modern science had sent the present-day Sherlock Holmes’ scampering for the judicious use of scientific and technological application.
Its increasing dependency to computer processes needs an equally substantive evaluation. Its custom-made, up-to-the-minute tests using a number of methods and apparatus necessitate the employ of a certain check valve to maintain the integrity of these methods and tools. There is wisdom in tailing the same ideals as the fictional legend “ Sherlock Holmes represents the following values he is resourceful, quintessentially English, intelligent, learned, insightful and relishes a challenge. “ Of equal importance is the real-life establishing Computer Forensic Tools Test Method that in itself should be beyond question, acceptable to the community and must be able to stand the test of time.
Thus, the need for a relevant Control Process (CoP). The ensuing control process can be applied in the following terms and related courses of action: 1. An independent, second-look, air-tight evaluation of tools test results to be conducted by the forensic community themselves e. g. the legal circles, crime-scene investigators (CSI), the mix of scientific and medical personalities and well-meaning citizens themselves. This should lead to an ever-improving standards. 2.
Encourage and widen relevant discussions and magnification of test methods as a built-in control mechanism. Constant public scrutiny of the matter increases both its efficiency, credibility and acceptability.