Critical on the movieThe lottery directed by Madeleine Sackler - Movie Review Example

As per the film, the UFT fight to repossess the closed down building of a public school whose ownership changes to that of Harlem group of schools. In contrast, the UTF and the public view this move as one to degrade the public schools, which is not. A summary of the movie’s argument The film follows in the lives of four children namely Eric Jr., Ameenah, Greg Jr., and Christian whose backgrounds are seemingly different. The film portrays them as being the carriers of the ambitions and dreams of what their parents could not achieve in their hay days.

The four children compete for the one opening available in the school. However, the events surrounding the schools closure give a twist to the whole story. A better part of the anti-charter schooling activists fight all through to lock out Harlem School from accessing public money. In addition, the closure of the public school draws the view that charter schools are better than those public schools. The film depicts the stakes on public education, as not all the stakeholders participate in deciding whether the Harlem Success School should possess the collapsed public school.

The chances of winning these lotteries are relatively low, but the movie shows that it is worth trying their luck. The demands and hindrances posed by the teachers’ unions are a constant hurdle that public schools have to overcome. In essence, it makes the quality of learning in public schools to deteriorate. The argument brought out in this film is that they need not do away with public schools but should create more charter schools to benefit many. Sackler’s argument was that for her, she was not a politician but she only wanted to point out the real picture of the situation in the society.

About the interview she had with Barry Weiss, the movie was not in any way political, as it did not take any political stand. It neither took sides nor did point accusing fingers at any one. She argues that the inspiration behind the film was the number of disappointed parents she had witnessed during a lottery selection process. The need to ascertain why parents opted to undergo the risky fifty-fifty chance to acquire this chance for their children inspired her to do the film. Essentially, the movie’s argument was on why the chances to attend charter schools were necessary to many parents and children alike.

Secondly, Sackler’s argument was that the future of public education was also at stake. According to Weiss, her stumbling upon a group of protesters protesting against the current state of the public schools inspired her into doing the film. The fact that UTF had paid Acorn to silence them over the advocacy of charter schools to public schools during the protest was also present in the film. As per her film, the level of bureaucracy in the public schools and the governing of public schools were detrimental to the children’s future.

Therefore, her argument was that a broader look in to the affairs of the teachers’ unions responsible for the running of public schools was a matter of importance. Her argument was if there were high ranked institutions that could accord high quality of education, and then why not create many others. Thirdly, Miss Sackler argues that many parents ignore what the charter school is about hence they just view it as a gateway to success for their children. In essence, she uses a deaf