The paper "Analysis of an Existing Policy for Coal Mines in Queensland" is a good example of a case study on politics. Australia has one of the largest coal mines situated in Queensland. However, the mining activity is expected to deplete the area's resources to a dignified position. This owes to the fact that the mine occupies an area of close to 200 square meters. The expected amount of coal that can get mined in the mine is approximately 60 million tonnes on an annual basis (Merz, 2012). Therefore, the government ought to develop a regulatory policy that would control the depletion of groundwater that very essential in maintaining the level of underground water.
The initiation of the Adani Mining Pty Limited was followed by a set of policies that the project undertakings out to obey. The environmental protection (water) policy-2009, in this case, relates to groundwater management and monitoring policy is among the thirty-six renowned policies that got expressed during the initiation of the mining project by Adani. The groundwater and monitoring policy, which remained instituted under sections 13(1) and 133 of the Environment-Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, constituted several requirements.
The signing of these requirements led to the approval of the project. Precisely, the policy demanded that three months before the excavation process of the initial box started the directors, or approval recipients ought to submit the document of approval of groundwater management. The policy incorporated several sub-sections that described the monitoring network. First, it is intended to control the monitoring sites. Secondly, it would facilitate and ensure that sufficient monitoring of the impacts that the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) aquifers.
There is no exception to whether the aquifers were within or outside the area where the project was situated. The policy then exhibits a rationale for the specific design to use when drafting the monitoring network (Merz, 2012). The major issues that ought to be considered are the expected potential impacts of mining activity that would resultantly bring about the occurrence of matters related to national environmental significance. Ideally, the impacts regulated include those which affect the project area and those from the outside. The policy also contains the baseline for monitoring the data.
Preliminary data that can assist the environment body of the government to assess the miners’ endeavors that might endanger the life of groundwater. Additionally, the policy incorporates details affiliated with values segregated to show the potential impacts of mining. This will assist the state in managing the project while complying with the Environment Protection Act (1994). It also provides s basis of what actions can be taken to ensure that the outcomes of the mining endeavor are hazardous (Lindenmayer, 2009). Finally, the policy incorporates the baseline of monitoring the data which is available for the government of Queensland on semi-annual sessions. Aims and objectives of the environmental protection (water) policy-2009 The Environmental protection (water) policy of the year 2009 tries to achieve the set objectives affiliated with the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EPP) Act.
Ideally, this policy tries to protect the waters of Queensland from feasible over depletion by mining activities. Concurrently, the policy intends to offer the allowance to development in the industrial sectors which give was for ecological sustainability (Panwar et. al, 2011). That is; it aims at eliminating activities that would feasibly create ecological imbalance.
The waters that are protected by this policy include the streams, rivers, wetlands, aquifers, lakes and coastal areas. This research, however, dwells on the issue of groundwater.