The AUSSI Aqua Water Treatment Technology - Case Study Example

Introduction A conventional understanding of water treatment is that the treatment of water is an industrial process that makes water more acceptable and safe for domestic consumption delineating factors like the right PH. The treatment process as much as it may be a significant step for making water safe for consumption, it is not entirely reliable method of treatment of water for drinking especially if it is the municipal kind that treats a large amount of water at a time. The process of treatment of municipal water may be effective at the point of production. Nevertheless, in the process of transportation trough the piping system, water most often get contaminated by bacteria and corrosion agents in the pipe making the final water supplied to various households not 100% safe for domestic consumption(Cpcb 2008. pp.1–107). Water is a crucial agent that must be treated with caution as it harbors most of the planets microbes. At the same time, water is the sole substance that is used in abundance by human beings for domestic purposes. It would, therefore, be important to ensure the safety of water that is consumed in various households by ensuring that there is at least a single mechanism of water treatment at the point of water entry to the household or at the point of use(Bolto & Gregory 2007. pp.17–24). Due to the presence of a lot of impurities in the end water following the municipal treatment model, it is important that all households in Australia have a portable water treatment plan that would serve all members of the household irrespective of age and immune competence. Taking a typical Australian household with five members, the parents and three children of varied ages, this kind of a household could greatly benefit from the point of use water purification system that is provided by AUSSI AQUA(Qu et al. 2013. pp.3931–3946). The AUSSI AQUA water treatment technology. In an attempt to provide to the county’s households water that is free from contaminants such as lead, PCB, aluminum, benzene, iron and all the hard metals that are transported on water, the AUSSI AQUA company initiated the AUSSI AQUA ALKRO-5000 water treatment technology. The technology operates in phases once fitted to the home water supply system. In the initial stage, it removes suspended particles from the water such as salt, sand, dirt, rust, insect remains, fungi and any other solid suspended particle through a series of filtering processes. The second stage of the technology operational system in the coconut shell activated carbon block filter. The second system then removes particles like chlorine, pesticides, hazardous chemicals, volatile organic compounds, odor and bad taste(Nath et al. 2006). The third stage in the water purification process by the domestic alkro-5000 is the 0.0002 Nanofiltration membrane. This membrane is the key functional part in the reverse osmotic water filtration system. The membrane is rated for filtration of microns of diameters of as little as 0.0002 microns and above. The filtration process functions by forcing the passage of contaminated water through the membranes at an extremely high pressure into the opposite side of the membrane that is under low pressure. The resultant effect of passing the contaminated water under high pressure on one side of the filter with the opposite side having low pressure would be the deposition of all the materials above the rated microns on the intake of the system(Wong 2006 pp. 9–16). The rejected waste, and water is thus passed to the wastewater channel. Of the easily filtered out chemicals include magnesium, cyanide, lead, sodium and fluoride. The filtration process due to the advanced level of rated diameter of passage is capable of filtering out bacteria, viruses and protozoan of variant strains that are harmful to health. The fourth stage of the alkro water purification process is the polishing stage where the relevant mineral components are added to the purified water. The alkro-5000 water treatment technology has a TDS monitor is purposed to reverse the alkaline and osmotic water to a safer content for a healthy lifestyle. The technology makes the treated water oxygen-rich that enables the oxygen in the water to neutralize the positively charged free radicals in the water. With the positively charged ions neutralized, the system thereby makes an ionized alkaline water with a PH of 9-9.5, which assists in detoxification of acidic waste from the body and improves hydration. The system then adds beneficial minerals such as potassium, calcium and magnesium ions(Apostolidis et al. 2011. pp.869). The typical drinking water that has been at the offer for the Australian households by different municipal water supply system and bottled water has malty variant of chemicals and minerals. The acidic and alkaline minerals in the conventional water offer damage with the acidic minerals oxidizing and the alkaline minerals donating energy to the body in the form of negatively charged ions that may affect the normal and optimal operation of the body system. Nevertheless, the water that is normally used passes under the treatment of the water alkalizer, whereby, the tap water is run through an alkalizer thereby the water if filter of the organic components and chlorine. The water is then separated into acidic and alkaline seams, the water is then negatively charged with hydrogen and oxygen oxidized before reformatting at a molecular level into wetter water. Investigation into the water content reveals that the water consumed in Australian households even after treatment with the alkalized is still filled with industrial and pharmaceuticals. The unsafety of this water results as its inability to filter the soluble substances. The reverse osmotic filter, on the other hand, is capable of filtering the excess of the soluble minerals and adding just the right composition. The development of the AUSSI AQUD alkro technology has thus helped in saving many households from the negative consequences of consumption of ill-treated water. The treatment of water through the municipal treatment method heavily relies on the use of chlorine as the agent of decontamination. However, unknown too many is that chlorine destroys the body protective acidophils which nourish the immune components of the body. Chlorine in water at the same time combines with the organic impurities in the water to make trihalomethanes that are harmful to the body physiological process. Other than the municipal pipe transported water, many households at the same time have turned to the purchase of bottled water with the belief that they are the best-treated samples of water. However, a comparison of bottled water to AUSSI ALKRO-5000 water treatment technology reveals a different dimension of events. The stored bottled waters are packed with preservatives that make water taste and smell as much awful as the municipal tap supplied water. Economic wisely, comparing the installation of AUSSI water treatment technology and the purchase of bottled water, it turns out to be economic suicide purchasing bottled water at the expense of quality of water that in most cases is not assured (Bolto, B. & Gregory, J., 2007 pp.2301–2324.) Before undertaking the purchase of bottled water, it is a wise decision to consider the environmental implication of the process. Estimates have it that it takes 500 years to break completely down one plastic bottle. The Australian water bottling society makes about 600million liters of water packed in bottles of different dimensions. Out of all the bottles produced, only 36% of the bottles are recycled leaving about 400 million bottles of water recycled annually. The immense number of the plastic bottles have led the bottles to encroach in all types of the ecosystem thereby making the water problem not only a human issue by an issue that by extension threatens the well beings of the wildlife. Evaluation of AUSSI AQUA ALKRO-5000 In accordance to the Australian drinking water guidelines, drinking water ought to be clear, colorless, and adequately aerated with no un palatable taste or odor and should contain no suspended particles, either chemicals or pathogens. In the standards of drinking water, the drinking water guidelines at the same notes that a drinking water is one that is safe to drink over a lifetime with no resultant risk to health. A comparison of the standards of drinking water stipulated by the drinking water guideline to the reverse osmotic water treatment process makes the alkro-5000 a sufficient technique of water purification(Chartres & Williams 2006 pp.17–24.). The technology goes beyond the expected standards of water purification guidelines by making for provisions of additional mineral components that are added to the drinking water following oxidation and filtration. The treatment technology results to a clear and odorless water supply that is fresh and free from radiant that would be the case of bottled water when exposed to sun’s rays in the process of storage (Weiss, P.T., Gulliver, J.S. & Erickson, A.J., 2007), The advantage of the alkro-5000 technology that makes the process above the standards is the ability of the system to eliminate microbes without necessarily applying chemicals to the treatment process. Lack of additional chemicals for purposes of decontamination enables the water to retain its natural value having the necessary taste, color and mineral composition. Adequacy of the AUSSI AQUA ALKRO-5000 technology The adequacy of the system is determined by the possibility of the end product of the water purification process to be used for variant purposes. Following water purification process by the technology helps in the elimination of the use of chlorine. As discussed earlier, the use of chlorine in water purification lead to destruction of the protective acidophilus, which nourishes the immunity strengthening organisms lining the colon that harbors about 60% of the immune cell operation. It would, therefore, mean that water-related by chlorination method interferes with the immune system of a person and its consumption for the duration of time may lead to the development of immune deficient conditions(Rogerson et al. 2010 pp.51–59). The technology provides naturally oxygenated water with a positive charge oxygen ions neutralizing the radicals in the water. Neutralization of the free radicles helps in the promotion of anti-aging property that the water under this treatment acquires. The properties of water that is treated by this technology, therefore, enables the water to be safe for use by everyone, including infants and the elderly regardless of their immune sufficiency since the water would provide an improvement in the immunity development of the user (Crisp, G.J., 2012, pp.323–332). Suggested additional treatments Basing on the standards of water purification measures provided by the alkro-500, it is needless to add additional treatment to the already purified water. Nevertheless, since the high-pressure purification process filters substances and microbes of diameter of 0.0002 microns, it is important to not that there are chances of tinier microorganisms with diameters less than the prescribed to be filtered through (Weiss, P.T., Gulliver, J.S. & Erickson, A.J., 2007133, pp.218–229.)Even though the chance of these microbes existing in the final purified water is limited, it would be important for users with high levels of immune suppression to treat this water further by boiling. Boiling water at temperatures of about 100 degrees is one of the surest mechanisms of ensuring that the presence of any additional microbe in the water is eliminated. However, since the stage of boiling targets very tiny microorganisms, it is crucial to not that the hygiene level of handling the boiled water would determine its final level of safety (Sugahara & Eguchi 2012. pp.489–493). Feasibility of the alkro-5000 In as much alkro-5000 offers an effective mechanism of water purification; it only functions by purifying water that has already been availed at the household level. It, therefore, means that the method has to rely on other methods of availing this water to the household level like the municipal piping system. Nevertheless, the technology is a simple one that relies on basic filtration through pressure device. In terms of efficiency, the alkro-5000 technology offers an efficient method of water purification than the municipal water treatment method since it is capable of eliminating tinier microbes that could never be eliminated by the municipal water treatment process(Weiss et al. 2007133, pp.218–229.). The efficiency of the alkro-5000.technology is in a great relation to the maintenance practice, which only depends upon the release of brine that is filtered in the process thus preventing it from clogging the filtration process. The maintenance practice of the technology is less labor intensive, and the technology thereby offers a high reliable index following the maintenance. This is contrary to the municipal water treatment mechanism that demands intensive labor for maintenance purposes with most often offer of poor results after the maintenance. It would thus be important to compare the alkro-5000 technology to the municipal water treatment system in the ratio of the households they supply. In spite of supplying many households with “treated” water, the municipal treatment is difficult to maintain and results to additional costs that are the confounding effects of ill-treated water utilized by the households. Additional costs levied by a municipal water supply system come in the form of medical treatment costs that result from the consumption of ill-treated water. In as much as the council may put more effort in the treatment of water, microbes would likely enter the system through burst and leaking pipes in the transportation system coupled with the products of corrosive agents that are resultantly consumed at home. In a household with immune incompetent members like the infants and the elderly, the municipal water would result to the development of conditions that would increase treatment cost for the household(Costa & de Pinho 2006). In comparing alkro-5000 technology with the bottled water, apart from safety due to lack of preservatives that may end up contaminating the water, the alkro-5000 technology is cost effective to the economy in general. Bottles from the bottled water companies demand safety deposition after the use, due to increase in the number of bottles; it would result to increase in the demand for landfills. An increase in the landfill levels increases the greenhouse effect by the emission of greenhouse gasses. Increasing the funds for managing the greenhouse gases, as well as acquisition of new landfills, would ultimately bring implication upon the economy, thereby increasing the cost of living (Clasen et al. 2007 pp.599–608.).The use of preservatives in the commercial bottled water at the same time has health effect in addition to the radiation resulting from a high possibility of poor storage would make the alkro-5000 technology to have a greater cutting edge than the commercial water. The installation process of the alkro-5000 technology is about $2100.00 at retail price. This cost is cheap in relation to the additional costs than municipal and commercial water. The benefits of the technology are as a result of the measurable and accurate standards of the water content it purifies providing water with the right amount of mineral content and PH that is suitable for domestic consumption. Conclusion The process of water purification by the alkro-5000 technology is fast and efficient offering high-quality water that meets the standards of the Australian drinking water guidelines. The technology offers purification process that enables the end product to be of great value to all members of the Australian households irrespective of the age or immune competence. This, therefore, makes the technology more feasible in terms of purchase and maintenance cost. Other than provision of safe water for domestic consumption, the technology mainly helps in conservation of the environment by minimizing the required number of landfills and saves the economy a lot of burden from greenhouse gas effects. References Apostolidis, N., Hertle, C. & Young, R., 2011. Water Recycling in Australia. Water, 3, pp.869–881. Retrieved on 28th August 2014 from . Bolto, B. & Gregory, J., 2007. Organic polyelectrolytes in water treatment. Water Research, 41, pp.2301–2324. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Chartres, C. & Williams, J., 2006. Can Australia Overcome its Water Scarcity Problems ? Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture, 1, pp.17–24. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.wentworthgroup.org/docs/Chartres_%26_Williams.pdf Clasen, T. et al., 2007. Cost-effectiveness of water quality interventions for preventing diarrhoeal disease in developing countries. Journal of water and health, 5, pp.599–608. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://courses.washington.edu/h2owaste/article.pdf Cpcb, R., 2008. Status of water treatment plants in India. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, pp.1–107. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.cpcb.nic.in/upload/NewItems/NewItem_103_statusofwaterqualitypackage.pdf Costa, a R. & de Pinho, M.N., 2006. Performance and cost estimation of nanofiltration for surface water treatment in drinking water production. Crisp, G.J., 2012. Desalination and Water Treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 42, pp.323–332. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Nath, K.J., Bloomfield, S. & Jones, M., 2006. Household water storage, handling and point-of-use treatment. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.ifh-homehygiene.org. Qu, X., Alvarez, P.J.J. & Li, Q., 2013. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Research, 47, pp.3931–3946. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://alvarez.blogs.rice.edu/files/2013/06/159.pdf Rogerson, S.J., Wijesinghe, R.S. & Meshnick, S.R., 2010. Host immunity as a determinant of treatment outcome in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 10, pp.51–59. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309909703226# Sugahara, K. & Eguchi, M., 2012. The use of warmed water treatment to induce protective immunity against the bacterial cold-water disease pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum in ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 32, pp.489–493. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105046481100458X Weiss, P.T., Gulliver, J.S. & Erickson, A.J., 2007. Cost and Pollutant Removal of Storm-Water Treatment Practices. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 133, pp.218–229. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://watertech.rutgers.edu/Publications/Member-Submitted(Peer-Reviewed)/John_Gulliver/Weiss-Gulliver-Erickson-2007.pdf Wong, T.H.F., 2006. An Overview of Water Sensitive Urban Design Practices in Australia. In Water Practices and Technology. pp. 9–16. Retrieved on August 29th 2014 from http://www.iwaponline.com/wpt/001/0018/0010018.pdf Read More