The paper " A Current Trend and Development within Mental Health" is a great example of a case study on psychology. Mental health is currently at the crossroads with one side indicating that its policy is increasingly changing in relation to the response requirements of the new human rights agenda such as personalization and social inclusion as well as ant-discrimination. Conversely, mental health remains shaped through public order and risk management concerns. In addition, tensions between therapy and its management, wider user choice, and the associated service controls with the specialist services are among the various trends in mental health.
Based on the general assessment made on the contemporary society, concerns about the public mental health situations and the wellbeing are emerging that are evidently shown through increasing concerns on the more use of ant-depressants( Thornicroft, 2006). Today, mental health service providers are no longer disputing the inclusion of user rights but making discussions on the relevant mechanisms for ensuring the achievement of meaningful user involvement. Changes in the mental health policy have occurred due to the emergence of the new psychiatry agendas.
For instance, the recent calls for the new focus on people as well as their individual or lived experiences are aimed at delivering more effective services. The development of person-centered psychiatry has predated such a call. This study examines the benefits, rationale, implementation of personalization, and social inclusion as the new trends or developments within the mental health Trust practices as the case of study. Personalization and social inclusion within the mental health services Personalization and social inclusion is the recent trend within mental health. The two ambitions meet more challenges from the older culture that was entirely identified with both fear and discrimination that emerged to be the larger contributors to severe mental illness.
More progress within the mental health services has been made. Personalization has been considered as a key strand within the current and emerging health as well as social care policies.
Allen, R, Gilbert, P, & Onyett, S. (2009), Report 27: Leadership for personalization and social inclusion in mental health, London: SCIE.
Brewis, R. (2007), A choice and a voice, Retrieved January 28, 2011 from,
Carr S. (2008), Personalization: a rough guide, SCIE, Retrieved January 28, 2011 from,
Kneating et al. (2002), Breaking the circles of fear, The Sainsbury centre for mental health. SCIE.
Lyons, J. (2005), A systems approach to direct payments: a response to “Friend or foe?” Towards a critical assessment of direct payments, Critical Social Policy, 25 (2), 240–52.
McCrone P et al. (2003), Mental health service activity in London, The King’s fund.
NSIP (National Social Inclusion Programme), (2009), Vision and progress, London, NSIP.
Rankin, J. & Regan, S., (2004), Meeting Complex Needs: ippr/ Turning Point.
Perkins, R et al. (2004), Reality out of the Rhetoric: User Involvement in a Mental Health Trust, Mental Health Review, 9(1).
Thornicroft, G. (2006), Shunned: Discrimination against people with mental health problems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vick, N. and Spandler, H. (2006), Opportunities for independent living using direct payments in mental health, Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(2): 107–15.
Williamson. (2004), User Involvement – a Contemporary Overview, Mental Health Review, 9(1).