Expressing and Assessing the Rights, Development, and Wellbeing of Children – Case Study Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Expressing and Assessing the Rights, Development, and Wellbeing of Children" is a good example of a case study on sociology. Family life encounters a lot of challenges. There are issues such as domestic violence that negatively influence children’ s rights, development, and wellbeing. Parents are supposed to provide support and protection to their children. It is the right of every child to get access to basic and secondary needs. The government, parents, and caregivers are supposed to initiate a mechanism to protect the children living in society. The paper provides assessments of the Dean’ s rights, his development and wellbeing, factors that prevent his mother, Rachel, to prioritize on Dean and risks as well as the protective factors that exist in this Dean’ s family system.

Furthermore, the study elaborates three social theories that are attachment, anti-oppression and empowerment theories in assessing the Dean’ s life. Finally, the study provides intervention strategies that should be applied in meeting the Dean’ s needs. Therefore, the paper relates Rachel's case study in expressing and assessing the rights, development, and wellbeing of children. Furthermore, the paper will also address some of the challenges families experienced and how they can be prevented or protected. Assessment of Dean’ s rights, development, and wellbeing Dean, like any other Australian child, has the right to grow up in a good, safe and stable environment.

He should be protected from neglect and abuse and ensuring his developmental needs are attended like for any other children. Dean lived with her paternal grandmother where he got life security as all his needs and protections were provided. Rachel’ s life has encountered a lot of challenges such as drug abuse, domestic violence, and imprisonment.

This nature of life has influenced Rachel affectionate love with Dean compared to other children, Tasha and Braydon. This has contributed to the disjointed primary attachment that was supposed to exist between Rachel and her son Dean. It was connected to the nature of life that was encountered between Rachel and Dean’ s father in their family life relationship. In this position, the government needs to ensure the safety of such children like Dean through ensuring basic needs and other rights are achieved. This requires reinforcement when the child’ s parent fails to protect or mistreat their children (Ferguson, 2010).

The Australian government has established statutory child protections that are responsible for ensuring children's rights are enacted. This statutory child protection right includes Children and Yong People Act 2008, Care and Protection of Children Act 2007 (NT), Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1997 (TAS) and Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA) among others. In the development and wellbeing of Dean, there are fundamental principles that parents, paternal grandmother and the government should consider. It is a collective responsibility of the Dean’ s caregiver to ensure like every other child, and he enjoys the right to be safe from any harm.

He is supposed to experience a good life and protected from any external harm that may arise especially at a tender age. In assessing the right, development, and wellbeing of Dean, the following issues are considered; Life and physical health; physical health is essential to determine the wellbeing of a child. This indicates that Dean has the right to a full and decent life like other children. It enables a child to enjoy life to the fullest and interact with others freely.

This helps in assessing the nature of life that Dean, like any other children, is entitled to enjoy life wellbeing. Dean encountered different challenges such as lack of proper care, security, and emotional support. This led to both physical and emotional challenges such as stress. Love and care; Dean needs to be loved by his mother, Rachel to feel protected. The care and protection is the right of a child as they ensure he is safe and healthy.

His mother, Rachel, is supposed to treat all children equally without showing favoring or discrimination. It is the right of the child to be taken care of in a safe and stable family environment (Ferguson, 2016). An alternative form of care is supposed to be initiated if the family environment, for some reason, cannot and not in full potential to provide a safe and stable family environment (Aubrey & Dahl, 2006). According to the Dean’ s situation, his mother has to her love as well as caring for him as her child.

He is supposed to be embraced as a member of the family. The love and care from his mother would make him feel being welcomed to live with his sisters as a united family. Mental well-being; it is the right of a child to be brought up in a good environment that ensure good mental health. The factors that influence mental well-being include maltreatment and exploitation, injury and abuse, neglect and negligent treatment and domestic violence (Ferguson, 2016). Dean has been influenced both mentally and physically by the environmental factors he is facing.

The effects are shown when his mother confesses she does not want to live with him and instead to get back to his grandmother. Emotional stress in Dean’ s life occurs after realizing his mother is not interested in his wellbeing as her child. The gap arising between mother and son is so clear to influence Dean’ s mental wellbeing. Bodily integrity and safety ensure that children are protected from any form of violence. It is the role of the parent to ensure children are safe and out of any impending danger.

Dean like any other child is supposed to be protected. This is the responsibility of the parents irrespective of their differences (Young-Bruehl, 2009). Therefore Rachel, Dean’ s mother, and Paul his dad are responsible for Dean’ s protection and safety. The right to social relations helps children in interacting with parents and other children for social networking. It also enables children to receive social and moral support from parents and other community members (Young-Bruehl, 2009). This is connected to the undesirability of withdrawing the children from the environment or neighborhood unnecessarily with which the child has been established (Garbarino, 2001).

This affects the child emotionally and hence influencing his or her behavior in establishing a new connection with the new environment. Relating to Dean’ s situation, he does not have access to his mother who neglects and does not want to be involved with him. This is tormenting as Dean feels rejected and the only love he gets comes from his grandmother.


An initiative of the Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Protecting Children is Everyone’s Business. National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children. 2009–2020, 6-36.

Australian Association of Social Workers. (2010). CODE OF ETHICS. AASW Code of Ethics, 7-40.

Aubrey, C., & Dahl, S. (2006). Children’s Voices: The Views of Vulnerable Children on Their Service Providers and the Relevance of Services They Receive. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 21–39.

Babington, B. ( 2011). National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children. Perspectives on progress and challenges, 11-19.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives. Developmental Psychology. 22(6), 723-742.

Devaney, J. (2009). Chronic Child Abuse: The Characteristics and Careers of Children Caught in the Child Protection System. British Journal of Social Work. 39, 24–45.

Ferguson, H. (2016). Researching SocialWork Practice Close Up: Using Ethnographic and Mobile Methods to Understand Encounters between social workers, Children, and Families. British Journal of Social Work.46, 153–168.

Ferguson, H. (2010). Walks, Home Visits, and Atmospheres: Risk and the Everyday Practices and Mobilities of Social Work and Child Protection. British Journal of Social Work. 40, 1100–1117.

Ferguson, H. (2016). What social workers do in performing child protection work: evidence from research into face-to-face practice. Child and Family Social Work, 21, 283–294.


Geggie, J., Weston, R., Hayes, A., & Silberberg, S. (2007). The Shaping of Strengths and Challenges of Australian Families. Marriage & Family Review, 41(3-4), 217-239.

Medora, N. P. (2016). Strengths and Challenges of the Indian Family. Marriage & Family Review, 41(1-2), 165-193.

Moore, T., Noble-Carr, D., & McArthur, M. (2010). Who cares? Young people with parents who use alcohol or other drugs talk about their experiences with services. Australian Institute of Family Studies, 18-26.

Munro, E. (2008). Effective Child Protection. Nurse Education in Practice, 5-6.

O’Donnell, M., Scott, D., & Stanley, F. (2008 ). Child abuse and neglect – is it time for a public health approach? Children and young adults, 32(4), 325-329.

PAYNE, M. (2014). Modern Social Work Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Scott, D. (2003). A Vision for Family Services: Support and prevention that works for families at risk. Developing practice, 54-62.

Winkworth, G., & McArthur, M. (2006). Being "Child-centred" in children protection; What does it mean? Children in Australia. 31(4), 13-19.

Wise, S. (2003). The child in family services: expanding child abuse prevention. Australian Social Work, 56(3), 183-196.

Young-Bruehl, E. (2009). Childism—Prejudice against Children. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 45(2), 251-265.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us