The paper “Argument for the Return of Elgin Marbles to Greece" is a great example of a case study on visual arts. The Elgin Marbles were taken to the British museum by legal means. It is evident that the remains of the Parthenon sculptures in the British Museum were acquired by Lord Elgin under the laws pertaining at the time. The Trustees of the British Museum have had understandable authorized title to the sculptures since 1816 (The British Museum Web). The Greek government recently presented their claims over the return of the sculptures from the British Museum to Athens in 1985. Returning the Parthenon sculptures to Greece need not create a standard, leading to claims for the universal restoration of cultural assets to the countries of origin and thus depleting the great museums of valuable exhibits (The British Museum Web).
The British lawmakers handed over the Parthenon sculptures to the British Museum because they had the powers to do so. However, the problem is not between the governments of Britain and Greek. When in the opposition they attempted to block the building of the New Acropolis Museum. The creation of the New Acropolis Museum strengthens the return of Elgin marbles even more.
The appeal is placed by the influence of the citizens of Greece to the whole global population for the benefit of worldwide cultural balance. It is believed that the improvisation for internal use, which was the approach of the preceding regime, did not help at all (The Parthenon Gallery Web). The political will of the government is for the Acropolis Museum to be built. The return of the Parthenon sculptures is simply a matter of an agreement between the Greek and the British population in the wider European framework to which they both belong. There are no official allegations against anybody in the matter of Elgin Marbles, and no arbitration is required. These are the reasons why it is necessary to take back the Elgin Marbles to Greece:
It restores the harmony of a single monument which is the ultimate symbol of the Greek cultural heritage and western society (The Parthenon Gallery Web). It is an appeal for the people of Greece who envision the reunification of a mutilated monument that belongs to the world cultural heritage.
The disconnection of the parts of the Parthenon makes it ultimately unmemorable. The return makes it changeable and reminds the people of Greek of the motivation of human beings to make and be in the advance guard (Marbles Web). Elgin marble’s importance and common values make them fit in with the world population. The sculptures shape a cultural deposit for the global community of citizens.
The return will also improve the integrity of the monument and its original site with the sculptures displayed against the backdrop of the Parthenon and in visual contact with the temple (Demands of the Greek Government Web). They inspire the universe with their diachronic meaning. Their future preoccupies all the active and sensitive citizens of the earth. The temple’s great size and lavish use of white marble also show off the city’s power and wealth at the height of its territory.
The return is an expectation of the universal community as well hence understanding of the welfare of humanity will be achieved. The political will of the government is for the Acropolis Museum to be built. The return is perceived as the reference and the starting point for the future growth of the 21st century (Marbles Web).
There need not be any winners and losers in the solution to this long-standing problem. There is no legal claim against anyone in this case and no adjudication is required. The return of the Parthenon sculptures is just a matter of co-operation between the Greek and the British peoples. It is apparent that taking the sculptures back to Greece cannot interfere with Greece’s presence in the British Museum as it may be presumed.
What matters is where they are and where they should be (Marbles Web). On this point, I believe that the return of the Elgin Marbles will ensure the continuity and the integrity of the unique monument known as the Parthenon. The restitution of the Marbles will reinstate the unity of the decoration and the architectural cohesion of the monument.
It is worth noting that the Parthenon sculptures were regarded as an essential part of the temple. The time has come for the reunification of the monument on its original Acropolis site (Brown Web). Therefore, what is useful is for the sculptures to be returned so that they can be housed in a new state-of-the-art Acropolis Museum.
It will be reasonable for the originals to be with the originals and not the copies with the originals ensuring the structural preservation, protection of its surfaces and the maximum degree of protection for the sculptures (The British Museum Web).