Human Dignity and Data Privacy – Case Study Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Human Dignity and Data Privacy" is a brilliant example of a case study on sociology. The subject of human dignity has been debated for a long time (Bayertz 1996). Human dignity is a wide subject that calls for multidisciplinary interpretation and approach. It is considered the ‘ feeling of being valued as a human being’ . It can be looked at in two ways namely: at a personal level and other people’ s view. The impact of human dignity is useless if the same human being does not feel it (Bonefeld 2005).

It should build the character of human personality but not to destroy it. It involves not only the possession of strong morals but also helping society to prosper and develop. However, the issue of what is moral and immoral in society also brings more controversy on the subject of human dignity (Bayertz 1996). Human beings have tried hard to flex their muscles upon other creatures, in an attempt to show his superiority. On the hand, human beings have done this by creating differences among themselves. This has brought more cracks and gaps in the society.

As a result, some people are considered more worthwhile than others are. This is, in all aspects, unnecessary. The multidimensional aspect of human beings should be appreciated and respected by the same. It should as well be protected by the conscious minds of society. One aspect of an individual’ s ability cannot be taken to mean that he is more valuable than the rest. The issue of equality is a factor that should be integrated into the equation (Kateb 2011). For this reason, the following paper intends to analyze the issues of human dignity in relation to online data privacy.

On this note, a case study will be provided based on the online data security, in relation to the provision of security. There is a consistent trend of the provision of personal information, using the online platform by individuals and other entities. Terrorists and other criminals have taken advantage of this to harm the public. Several human dignity factors are raised by this trend. On this concern, many governments are starting to enact laws that will ensure personal information available online and other devices is tapped and recorded for analysis in order to protect human dignity.

This has attracted a lot of criticism from various quarters. In line with human dignity, this issue will be discussed by looking at two perspectives. The first is the argument that it is right for governments to take precautionary measures by tapping this information to protect human life. The second is the ‘ shamelessness’ with which people are posting their personal information online, for social status, which could be interpreted as the lack of human dignity (Bloch 2001).

The two perspectives raise the multidimensionality of human dignity in relation to the case in point. The paper will include the justification for every perspective, including the social values held by the same view. Finally, the paper outlines some of the aspects of human dignity that will be jeopardized by considering each of these perspectives.


Amitai E. (2014): “NSA: National Security vs. Individual Rights,” Intelligence and National

Security. NSA.

Arnold, Br.(2013). The Australian Public Cares about Privacy: Do Politicians? Australia. The


Bayertz, K. (1996). Sanctity of life and human dignity. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Bloch, E. (2001). Natural law and human dignity. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Pres

Bonefeld, W. (2005). Human dignity: social autonomy and the critique of capitalism.

Burlington, VT Ashgate.

Ian K. & Jessica E. (2013). Prediction, Preemption, Presumption: How Big Data Threatens Big

Picture Privacy”. Stanford Law Review Online.

Kateb, G. (2011). Human dignity. Cambridge, Mass, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Kirchhoffer, D. G. (2013). Human dignity in contemporary ethics. Amherst, NY, Teneo Press.

Lebech, M. (2008). On the problem of human dignity: a hermeneutical and phenomenological

investigation. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann.

Malpas, J., & Lickiss, N. (2007). Perspectives on human dignity: a conversation. Dordrecht, The

Netherlands, Springer.

Reardon, B. (2012). Educating for human dignity learning about rights and responsibilities.

Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Sieh, E. W. (2006). Community corrections and human dignity. Boston [u.a.], Jones and Bartlett


Sensen, O. (2011). Kant on human dignity. Berlin, De Gruyter.

Smith, M. A. (2013). Human dignity and the common good in the Aristotelian-Thomistic

tradition. Lewiston, N.Y., Mellen University Press.

Soulen, R. K. (2006). God and human dignity. Grand Rapids, Mich. Eerdmans.

Tibbles, A. (2005). Transatlantic slavery: against human dignity. Liverpool [England],

Liverpool University Press/National Museums Liverpool.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us