The Nature of Accidents and Catastrophes – Case Study Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Nature of Accidents and Catastrophes" is an excellent example of a case study on environmental studies.   Today, there are many accidents and catastrophes that occur in different parts of the world. Many people are dying and millions worth of properties go down the drain. It has resulted in social, economic, and environmental impacts to the affected people and locations. Different countries are developing policies that guide and manage their vulnerability to different accidents and catastrophes. Some common examples of accidents include the 7/7 London Bombing, 9/11 Twin Towers bombing which is accredited to terrorism. The aim of this report is to understand the nature of accidents and catastrophes and the classification of these catastrophes.

Furthermore, a case study of Preston is analyzed in depicting accidents that may occur. Moreover, the analysis goes beyond Preston and it will analyze two catastrophes that are well known, the lessons that were learned and legislations that were developed to manage and control such circumstances. Finally, discussion of the UK disaster management plans will be evident including legislations and reconstruction strategies that are developed in ensuring that the effects of the accident and catastrophe are brought into an understanding. A catastrophe is an impact that causes a negative effect on the environment and society.

This means that catastrophes results due to a lack of inappropriately managed risk. Hence, in our case, a risk is a product that results due to vulnerability and hazard. However, a hazard that occurs in a low vulnerability area may not be termed as a catastrophe e. g. an uninhabited region. The impact of a catastrophe differs depending on countries. In developing countries, catastrophes are more devastating when compared to developed or industrialized countries.

Generally, a catastrophe or an accident may be classified in two ways: Human-made and Natural. These two types of catastrophes depend on the causative agents (Halley 1999, p. 16 - 17). Classification of Catastrophes Man-made disaster This is a type of disaster that has an influence on human inability and may result due to negligence, human intent, a failure, or an error of a system. Hence, it means that the man-made disasters are those which result from human hazards without any adequate emergency management measures that are in place.

In most cases, man-made disasters can be further be divided into two parts: sociological and technology disasters. Sociological disasters results due to the activities of man's behavior in regards to other beings. Some examples of sociological disasters are terrorism, civil disorder, crime, and war. On the other hand, technological disasters result in the advancement of human needs in developing the right equipment and accessories that fulfill their needs. Examples of technological disasters are structural collapse, industrial hazards, transportation, and hazardous materials. Natural Disasters This type of disaster is a result of natural occurrence hazards that affect human activities.

The extent of damage or impact on human vulnerability results in poor or lack of the appropriate emergency management and may lead to human, environmental and financial losses. This means that the loss that will result due to natural disasters depends entirely on the capacity that the population will be able to resist and manage the disaster. This means that a natural disaster may not be caused by a natural hazard but the vulnerability of the inhabitants.


Allred, A., Addams, H.L., and Chakraborty, G. (2007), ‘Is informal planning the key to success of Disaster Management?’ Journal of Small Business Strategy, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp. 95-104.

Baker, F 2006, Introduction to Disasters: Categories, O’Reilly Publishers, New York.

Bramble, T 2006 ‘Understanding Chernobyl Accident and Other Accidents’, Journal of Sociology, Sep., vol. 42. pp. 287 – 309

Bramwell, B 1997, Containment of Disasters, Prentice Hall of Jakarta, Jakarta

Davids, M., and Newcomb, K. (2006), ‘Examples of Disasters and Impacts to Population, Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 22-25.

Halley, N. 1999. Disasters, McGraw Hill Publishers, New York.

Hawthorne, F 2003, Analysis of EU Disasters and Policies, New York Publishers, New York.

Homan, R 2004, UK Disaster Management, Sage Publications, London.

Isenberg, D.J. (1987), ‘The tactics of disaster containment,’ Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65, Iss. 2, pp. 92-97.

McDonald, M.H.B. (1992), ‘Barriers in Developing Policies in Accidents Control,’ The journal of Business and Industrial Control, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 5-18.

Melton, W 2004, Introduction to London, Cambridge University Press, Singapore.

Simkin, L. (2006), ‘7/7 London Bombings: Act of Terrorism,’ The Journal of Business, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 8-22.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us