A Comparison of the Health Insurance in Australia and Canada – Case Study Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ A Comparison of the Health Insurance in Australia and Canada” is an affecting example of a case study on health sciences & medicine. Australia and Canada are proud of their health care schemes, including health insurance programs. Health insurance is known as a means of offering coverage for health services that are under the public health care insurance plan. The demand for a health insurance cover is associated with the need to increase the overall social welfare. Every country has unique health care insurance schemes that assist in ensuring health care accessibility, equality, and choices to its citizens (Colombo and Nicole, 2004).

In addition, different countries struggle with the complexity of managing as well as ensuring a sustainable, equitable health care system that can be brought about by a sound health insurance scheme. In most countries, however, there is a concern about the sustainability of the health care systems due to the unsound health insurance schemes (Colombo and Nicole, 2004). This paper will compare health insurance between Australia and Canada. It will offer the similarities and differences of health insurance schemes between the two countries and will describe its strengths and weaknesses. Health Insurance in Australia and Canada SimilaritiesIn Australia and Canada, healthcare systems are government-funded as well as private health insurance.

Medicare in the two nations is considered a public-funded healthcare system. Also, in both countries, there is duplicate private healthcare insurance in terms of healthcare provision (Colombo and Nicole, 2004). Duplicate private insurance covers for healthcare services that are already under the public health insurance plan. This means that patients have the chance to choose both the doctors as well as the health facilities of their choice.

In addition, the two countries compare due to the use of the universal healthcare system known commonly known as Medicare (Flood et al. , 2005). Furthermore, in both nations, they give their citizens the right to access high quality and safe healthcare services regardless of the financial capabilities of their citizens. Australia has a corresponding Act safeguarding the healthcare services within its boundaries the same was as Canada Health Act (Lemmens, Trudo and Archibald, 2005). Similarly, both Canada and Australia significantly value their healthcare universally.

Both nations view Medicare as replicating their national attribute for every citizen. In both Australia and Canada, the benefits acquired from Medicare are on the basis of a fee schedule that is established by the Australian government (Colombo and Nicole, 2004). They cover issues benefits for consultation fees for both doctors and specialists; eye tests conducted by optometrists; a number of surgical as well as therapeutic operations conducted by the physician and surgical operations conducted by approved dentists (Colombo and Nicole, 2004). In both nations, Medicare ensures that every citizen has the right to use free and low-cost medical as well as hospital care.

At the same time, they are free to choose the private health services they desire (Lemmens, Trudo and Archibald, 2005). Medicare systems in both countries offer free treatment for public Medicare patients within a public hospital are offered free subsidized treatment by specialists such as doctors and dentists to name a few for assigned services only (Colombo and Nicolle, 2004). Also, individuals that are eligible for access to Medicare services ought to have the following qualifications: they should be citizens of their country; they should possess a permanent resident visa and they ought to follow up with applications for permanent resident visas (Colombo and Nicolle, 2004).

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us