Citizen Participation with Government in Policy Development – Capstone Project Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Citizen Participation with Government in Policy Development" is a great example of a capstone project on social science. Public participation is considered as a deliberative process by which the interested citizens, the government, and civil society organizations take part in policy-making prior to making any political decision (Carson and Gelber, 2001). It is a thoughtful discussion that is hinged on giving and taking of reasons for choices. For instance, public participation acknowledges the pluralism of objectives and values, which enables collaborative problem solving that, is aimed at achieving legitimate policies (Herriman 2011).

In the same line of discussion, public participation is the highest order of public engagement; information is exchanged between the sponsors of the participation process and the participants (Cornwall 2008). It is also referred to as a political principle, which might also be recognized as a right. Public participation always seeks and facilitates the engagement of those interested in or potentially affected by political decisions. In this regard and according to the principles of public participation, individuals who are affected by the decision have a right to be involved in the process of decision-making.

For this reason, it is implied that the contribution of the public has a massive influence on the decision. The United Arab Emirates has made tremendous gains in development since its inception in 1971 (Menifield 2010). UAE is a federation of seven states established on December 2, 1971, given the then historical animosity in the region; the federation had minimal survival chances. However, year after year, the UAE has progressively grown as a successful federal entity in the Arab world (Hurriez 2013).

The success here is mainly attributed to the manner in which the government is structured; for instance, national policy, foreign policy, and the constitution are a function of the federal government while sovereignty is left to individual emirate states (Nee 2013). Given the fact that the federation lacks a competitive election system, the leaders are chosen among family members. The president is chosen by the Federal National Council (FNC).  

References

Abers, R 1998, “From clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil”, Politics and Society, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 511-537.

Almezaini, K 2012, The UAE and Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid, Identities and Interests, London, Routledge Publishers

Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, & UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures, 2011, Community engagement resources for local government: an annotated bibliography, Sydney, Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.

Baiocchi, G 2001, “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory”, Politics and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 43-72.

Barnes, M, Newman J, Knops A, and Sullivan, H 2003, “Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation”, Public Administration, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 379-399.

Batley, R 1999, Private sector involvement in the supply of public services, London, One World Action.

Bauer, I and Thomas, K 2006, “An evaluation of community and corporate bias in assessment tools”, International Social Science Journal, vol. 58, no. 189, pp. 501-514.

Bishop, P & Davis, G 2002, “Mapping public participation in policy choices”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 14-29.

Blair, H 2000, “Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries”, World Development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21-39.

Blair, H 2000, “Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries”, World Development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21-39.

Bretas, P 1996, “Participative budgeting in Belo Horizonte: democratization and citizenship”, Environment and Urbanisation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 213-222.

Brody, SD, Godschalk, DR and Burby, RJ 2003, “Mandating citizen participation in plan making‐Six strategic planning choices”, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 245‐264.

Bruce, LS 2003, Public Policy and Public Participation Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy, Prepared for Population and Public Health Branch, Atlantic Regional Office, Health Canada

Bucek, J and Smith, B 2000, “New approaches to local democracy: direct democracy, participation and the 'third sector”, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-16.

Carroli, L and Armstrong, JJ 2011, Survey report: South East Queensland community attitudes to consultation and engagement, Brisbane, Harbinger Consultants

Carson, L and Gelber, K 2001 Ideas for Community Consultation: A discussion on principles and procedures for making consultation work. A report prepared for the NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning. Sydney: NSW Government

Chaskin, R J and Garg, S 1997, “The issue of governance in neighbourhood-based initiatives”, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 631-661.

Cole, B L, Shimkhada R, Fielding JE, Kominski G, and Morgenstern, H 2005, “Methodologies for realizing the potential of health impact assessment”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 382-389.

Commonwealth Foundation, 1999, Citizens and governance: civil society in the new millennium, London, The Commonwealth Foundation.

Cornwall, A 2008, “Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices”, Community Development Journal, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 269‐283.

Cornwall, A 2008, “Unpacking 'Participation': models, meanings and practices”, Community Development Journal, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 269-283.

Cornwall, A and Gaventa, J 2000, “From users and choosers to makers and shapers: Repositioning participation in social policy”, IDS Bulletin, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 50-62.

Creighton, JL 2005, The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement, San Francisco, CA: Jossey -Bass.

Dannenberg, AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Dora C, Fielding JE, Kraft K and Tilson, HH 2006, “Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice”, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 262-270.

Datta, P and Sen, PB 2000, “Participatory Rural Governance in India”, Indian Institute of Public Administration, vol. XLVI, no. 1, pp. 38-49.

Douglas, MJ, Conway L, Gorman D, Gavin S, and Hanlon, P 2001, “Developing principles for health impact assessment”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 148-154.

Edralin, JS 1996, “The New Local Governance and Capacity-Building: A Strategic Approach – examples from Africa, Asia and Latin America”, Regional Development Studies, vol. 3, pp. 109-149.

Elliott, E and Williams, G 2008, “Developing public sociology through health impact assessment”, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1101-1116.

Fung, A 2006, “Varieties of participation in Complex Governance”, Public Administration Review-Washington DC, vol. 66, pp. 66-75

Fung, A and Wright, EO 2001, “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance”, Politics and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5-41.

Greig, S, Parry N and Rimmington, B 2004, “Promoting sustainable regeneration: Learning from a case study in participatory HIA”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 255-267.

Hamdi, N 2010, The place maker’s guide to building community, London, Earthscan.

Harris-Roxas, BF and Harris, PJ 2007, “Learning by doing: the value of case studies of health impact assessment”, New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 9-10, pp. 161-163.

Heller, P 2001, “Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralisation in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre”, Politics and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 131-163.

Herriman, J 2011, Local government and community engagement in Australia: Working Paper No. 5 Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology Sydney.

Herriman, J 2011, Local government and community engagement in Australia - Working Paper No 5 Sydney: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology Sydney.

Hurriez, S 2013, Folklore and Folklife in the United Arab Emirates, London, Routledge Publishers

Innes, JE and Booher, DE 2004, “Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century”, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 419-436.

Johnson, H and Wilson, G 2000, “Biting the bullet: Civil society, social learning and the transformation of local governance”, World Development, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1891-1906.

Legacy, C 2012, “Achieving Legitimacy through Deliberative Plan‐Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning”, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 71‐87

Lock, K 2000, “Health impact assessment”, British Medical Journal, vol. 320, no. 7246, pp. 1395-1398.

Mahoney, ME, Potter JL and Marsh, RS 2007, “Community participation in HIA: Discords in teleology and terminology”, Critical Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 229-241.

McCartney, G, Palmer S, Winterbottom J, Jones R, Kendall R, and Booker, D 2010 “A health impact assessment of the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow”, Public Health, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 444-451.

Menifield, C 2010, Comparative Public Budgeting: A Global Perspective, London, Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Milner, S, Bailey C, and Deans, J 2003, “‘Fit for purpose’ health impact assessment: a realistic way forward”, Public Health, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 295-300.

Mindell, JS, Boltong A, and Forde, I 2008, “A review of health impact assessment frameworks”, Public Health, vol. 122, no. 11, pp. 1177-1187.

Mohan, G and Stokke, K 2000, “Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 247-268.

Mukherjee, A 1996, Report on Peoples' Participation in the Process of Decentralised Planning in India, New Delhi, Government of India.

Nee, P 2013, Key Facts on the United Arab Emirates: Essential Information on the United Arab Emirates, London, The Internationalist

Neuman, WL, 2000, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, USA, Allyn and Bacon.

Oyugi, WO 2000, “Decentralisation for good governance and development: Concepts and Issues”, Regional Development Dialogue, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3-25.

Plein, LC, Green, KE and Williams, DG 1998, “Organic planning: A new approach to public participation in local governance”, Social Science Journal, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 509-523.

Quigley, RJ and Taylor, LC 2003, “Evaluation as a key part of health impact assessment: the English experience”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 415-419.

Reynolds, B and Sean, H, 1993, Power, Participation and Exclusion, Conference of Major Religious Superiors (CMRS), Dublin, Macmillan Publishers.

Reynolds, B and Sean, H, 2000, Participation and Democracy, Opportunities and Challenges, Conference of Major Religious Superiors (CMRS), Dublin: Macmillan Publishers.

Rippe, KP and Schaber, P 1999, “Democracy and environmental decision-making”, Environmental Values, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 75-88.

Robson, C 1993, Real world research:A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Rowe, G and Frewer, L J 2004, Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 29, pp. 512-556.

Sarkissan, W, Hurford, D and Wenman, C 2010, Creative community planning: Transformative engagement methods for working at the edge, London: Earthscan

Smith, LG 1984, “Public participation in policy making: the state-of-the-art in Canada”, Geoforum, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 253-259.

Smith, M and Beazley, M 2000, “Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: a Framework for Evaluation”, Public Administration, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 855-878.

Souza, C 1996 “Redemocratisation and Decentralisation in Brazil: The Strength of the Member States”, Development and Change, vol. 27, pp. 529-555.

Thompson, J 1995, “Participatory Approaches in Government Bureaucracies: Facilitating a Process of Institutional Change”, World Development, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1521-1547.

Veltmeyer, H 1997, “Decentralisation as the Institutional Basis for Community-Based Participatory Development: The Latin America Experience”, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 303-325.

Wates, N 2000, Community planning handbook, Earthscan, London.

Weeks, EC 2000, “The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials”, Public Administration Review, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 360-372.

Wilson, JQ 1995, Political organizations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Winters, LY 2001, “A prospective health impact assessment of the international astronomy and space exploration centre”, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 433-441.

Wright, J, Parry, J and Mathers, J 2005 “Participation in health impact assessment: objectives, methods and core values”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 58-63.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us