Neighborhood Urban Planning in Seattle City – Capstone Project Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Neighborhood Urban Planning in Seattle City" is a great example of a capstone project on design and technology.   Neighborhood in urban planning is considered a political settlement in a particular territory. It deals with planning that is greater than household size, but smaller than that of a city. The plan starts with defining the boundaries and maybe a hectic process since there are those who will not prefer to have particular houses or structures close to their boundaries (Hollander, 2011). There are those who at times engage in boundary wrangles and may make it hard to specify or distinguish the boundaries.

Neighborhood planning can work with both rural and urban setups. It is a means of making the locals have the ability to take care of their areas. Public participation is thus crucial in the process so that they give their opinions on how the boundaries are to be set (Miazzo et al. , 2014). Most of the times the natural features including rivers and parks are utilized in the division of areas depending on the census information. In this paper, consideration is on the ways in which the growth of Seattle City has been relying on neighborhood development.

The planning process captures livability, sustainability, health, safety, and community engagement in coming up with a Comprehensive Plan. The success of the entire process relies on these factors, which have been essential to the growth of Seattle City. The town has been experiencing population increase every year and expands rapidly hence the need for a plan that was to cater to its future prospects. Introduction In any given setup, those living as a community will have to interact with one another.

Planning for urban neighborhood begins with the identification of boundaries. It gives the planners an opportunity to engage those who may be affected due to the plan (Hollander, 2011). Assumptions are always that the process should be democratic, however; there are those who may carry out the plan with minimal contact or contribution from the residents. It leads to a lack of information that could be critical in carrying out the entire process. The interests of the residents when not taken into consideration may result in more problems since they will be the individuals staying in the settings (Miazzo et al. , 2014).

The neighborhood can be perceived as a small, independent area of employment, dwellings, civic, and retail places along with their immediate environment. The employees or residents can relate to it in terms of economic and social attitudes, institutions, and lifestyles. The planning should aim at understanding the prospects of individual neighborhoods. It will be essential in considering safety, health, livability, community engagement, and sustainability (Hollander, 2011). They are the determining factors of how the groups will live in peace and harmony.

It is upon the planners to employ strategies that will facilitate the inclusion of neighbors. Outreach methods will be efficient in reaching out to the stakeholders who may be of significance in planning. It can be through door-to-door visits or making contact with those in the region. It is time-consuming, and this can be reduced by the use of phone calls or distribution of flyers (Miazzo et al. , 2014). Media can also be useful in reaching out to different people for their contributions.

Another approach can as well be organizing formal conferences where the locals can be enlightened about the process and may give opinions on how best the services may be rendered to them.

References

Blasius, J., Friedrichs, J., & Galster, G. (Eds.). (2013). Quantifying neighborhood effects: frontiers and perspectives. London: Routledge.

Cullingworth, B. J., Cullingworth, J. B., & Caves, R. (2013). Planning in the USA: policies, issues, and processes. London: Routledge.

Farr, D. (2008). Sustainable Urbanism: Urban design with nature. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Geertman, S., Toppen, F. J., Stillwell, J. C. H., & International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning & Urban Management. (2013). Planning support systems for sustainable urban development. Berlin: Springer.

Gupta, K., Kumar, P., Pathan, S. K., & Sharma, K. P. (2012). Urban Neighborhood Green Index–A measure of green spaces in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(3), 325-335.

Hall, P. (2014). Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.

Hollander, J. B. (2011). Sunburnt Cities: The great recession, depopulation, and urban planning in the American Sunbelt. London: Routledge

Miazzo, F., Kee, T., Trancity (Organization), & CITIES (Organization),. (2014). We own the city: Enabling community practice in architecture and urban planning.

Sanders, J. C. (2015). Seattle and the Roots of urban sustainability: Inventing Ecotopia. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Susser, Ida. (2012). Norman Street: Poverty and Politics in an Urban Neighborhood, Updated Edition. Oxford University Press, USA.

Wheeler, S. M. (2013). Planning for sustainability: creating livable, equitable, and ecological communities. London: Routledge.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us