The paper "Examination of Gender Differences in the Use of Language in Dating Websites" is a good example of a capstone project on sociology. 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background Online systems of dating play a significant role in the social lives of contemporary society. There has been a rapid increase in the category of websites related to online dating (Ellison, Heino, & Gibbs 2006). As it is becoming more accepted, online dating still retains a slight negative stigma. With the widespread evidence of its presence and becoming mainstream, such types of websites are appearing regularly.
Sociologists predict that more than 18% of single persons use the internet for their dating purposes and there are various perceptions in regard to long-term relationships or marriages. However, academic research into the use of language in online dating is still scarce (Offen, 2010). The aim of some users of the internet is online dating in order to meet new friends in cyberspace and make online relationships. Some develop internet relationships into friendships while others even advance by turning them into relationships. Online dating sites represent spaces where virtual and actual self are intended to be as identical as possible where the self is usually presented in constructs of social interaction, gender, and age.
They present an opportunity for recording various changes in cultural norms in regard to the development of relationships that are mediated by technology and gaining insights into essential aspects of online behavior which include strategies of self-presentation and gender identity construction (Whitty, 2007). The study of the profiles on online dating provides dimensions to the research of gender, identity, and relationships in cyberspace. The use of language for both men and women such as the use of linguistics features in online dating is influential towards being a crucial issue in the study of linguistics.
This study was based on the investigation of the language, study of differences in gender on online dating sites, gender identities of users, for instance, their own presentation in their personal profiles and what they expect in these sites. In particular, consideration of differences in terms of lexical choices is essential while considering that Lakoff (1975) identified differences in gender in her article on Language and a Woman’ s Place.
In addition, there will be a consideration of such differences in regard to age. During the times of Lakoff, there was the publication of research that speculated that women were becoming more equal to men, a condition that made the differences in gender tend to be less noticeable due to the presence of neutralities. It is also important to understand if the content of the profile indicates any differences in regard to what is desirable in men and women. From past studies such as the Lonely Hearts advertisements in newspapers where online dating profiles could be considered in many ways as modern manifestation, it was found out that different genders had the tendency of advertising themselves based on different things.
Investigations on such differences in online dating nowadays will be important as well as any other differences discovered. Finally, all this information will be considered in order to consider whether the profiles on online dating provide notable examples based on the use of language differences between genders as well as the possible reasons for such differences if the differences exist.
Bereczkei, T, & Csanaky, 1996, “Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society”, Ethology and Socio-biology, vol. 17, pp. 23-35
Dunbar, RIM, Barrett, L, & Lycett, J 2007, Evolutionary Psychology: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld.
Ellison, N, Heino, R, & Gibbs, J 2006, “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 415–441.
Ellison, N, Heino, R, & Gibbs, J 2006, “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 11, pp. 415–441.
Fiore, A RT 2004, Romantic Regressions: An Analysis of Behaviour in Online Dating Systems, Master’s Degree thesis: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Holmes, J 1997, “Women, language and identity”, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 195–223.
Lakoff, R 1975, Language and Woman’s Place, New York: Harper & Row
Messinger, PR, Eleni S, & Kelly L 2008, “A Typology of Virtual Worlds: Historical Overview and Future Directions”, Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-18.
Offen, N 2010, "Sociologists: Internet dating on the rise". The Herald-Sun. February 13, http://www.allbusiness.com/humanities-social-science/sociology/13922241-1.html
Pawłowski, B.& Dunbar, RIM 2001, “Human mate choice strategies”. Economic Models of Animal and Human Behaviour, ed. by J. van Hooff, R. Noë & P. Hammerstein, 187-202. Cambridge University Press
Sanderson, CA, Keiter, EJ, Miles, M G, & Yopyk, DJA 2007, “The association between intimacy goals and plans for initiating dating relationships”, Personal Relationships, vol. 14, 225-243.
Shackelford, TK, Schmitt, DP, & Buss, DM 2005, “Universal dimensions of human mate preferences”, Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 39, pp. 447-458
Tannen, D 1994, Gender and Discourse: Oxford University Press.
Trudgill, P 1972, “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich”, Language in Society vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 179–195.
Valkenburg, PM, & Jochen, P 2007, “Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters”, CyberPsychology & Behaviour, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 849-852.
Walther, JB 2007, “Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2538-2557.
Whitty, MT 2007, “Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site”, Computers in Human Behaviour, vol. 24, pp. 1707–1723.
Woods, N 1989, ‘Talking shop: sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a working setting.’ in Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (eds.) 1989. Women in Their Speech Communities, pp. 141-157: Longman.