The paper "The Efficacy of the Commonwealth Respite Care Centers of the Australian Red Cross" is a worthy example of a capstone project on sociology. This paper is based on the evaluation of Commonwealth Carer Respite Centres managed by the Australian Red Cross, Perth Western Australia (Commonwealth Carer project) which assessed the efficacy of the Commonwealth Respite Care Centres (CCRCs) of the Australian Red Cross (ARC). The evaluation focused on a small sample of carers who had earlier participated in the survey conducted in the Commonwealth Carer project. Data gathered from the evaluation indicated that the central statement made by the Commonwealth Carer project regarding the high satisfaction level in carers about ARC CCRCs was indeed true.
Data also showed that despite a smaller number of survey participants in the current paper, the results for both the papers were similar in nature, with very minor differences in results. The paper concludes with recommendations on how to improve the research and make the data more accurate. Introduction This paper discusses various issues related to carer satisfaction at the ARC Commonwealth Respite Carer Centres that were discovered during the evaluation of the research paper “ Commonwealth Carer Respite Centres managed by the Australian Red Cross, Perth Western Australia” .
The research paper had found that the carers were ‘ extremely satisfied' with the CCRC of the ARC. They also praised the professionalism of the ARC CCRC staff members and stated that the centers had a positive impact on their lives. The report also stated that the carers were not dissatisfied with the Australian Red Cross. It was also stated that the ARC was able to meet the guidelines specified by the NRCP.
Carers in all the four CCRCs analyzed for the study expressed satisfaction about the workings of these CCRCs. Even individual data from each CCRC revealed that the carers had a positive image of the centers. Methodology The evaluation of the Commonwealth carer project by Edith Cowan University was put into the perspective of a theoretical platform as the aim of the paper is to understand the requirements of carers and provide a comprehensive analysis on how to fulfil all the needs of carers. For this paper, data was collected to make comparative analysis by collecting sample data from the four selected CCRCs that were analyzed in the University project.
The data from the four centers expected to prove whether the conclusions and recommendations made in the Commonwealth carer project were true or not. Further, it would also help in finding out if there had been an anomaly in the results of any of the centers and whether the carers in every center had a similar opinion (Denzin et al. , 2005). This paper undertook a qualitative method to collect data by conducting interviews through email and over the telephone (Patton, 2002).
The major participants for this report were the carers at these four centers. For this report, 10 carers were interviewed from each center. This also helped in finding out their perspectives from each center and analyze them with the collective responses (Loseke et al. , 2007). Although such a method of sample survey helped in evaluating the data of the Commonwealth carers project, it was not able to provide any trends due to the limited number of participants (Fischer, 2005). However, the analysis of the data collected for this paper did indicate that the central statement of the Commonwealth carers projects i. e.
carers at ARC CCRCs are indeed satisfied with the centers is indeed true.
Babbie, Earl R. (2005).The Basics of Social Research. Thomson Wadsworth, 174.
Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research”. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.), 1-32.
Fischer, C.T. (Ed.) (2005). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. Academic Press.
Loseke, Donileen R. & Cahil, Spencer E. (2007). Publishing qualitative manuscripts: Lessons learned. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: Concise Paperback Edition, 491-506.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.).