The paper "The Team Trainer: Winning Tools and Tactics for Successful Workouts by Gorden " is a good example of a book report on sports and recreation. A walk in the park Doing business in a fast-changing economic environment due to new technology, modern information and communication facilities and globalization necessitate quick response if a business is to prosper. In this context, the team approach takes on a new premium. This is the basic theme of Gorden et al’ s “ The Team Trainer: Winning Tools and Tactics for Successful Workouts. ” The book published by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
in 1996 is a product of multi-disciplinary team effort which according to Gorden is practicing what you preach, that is to learn to play and work together. The authors stress the basic strength of a team. It harnesses the potential of team members to a level of achievement impossible for an individual. The book takes a close look at how a team operates and provides the workouts to develop the knowledge, skill, and proper attitude for an effective team. To the authors, the importance of the team spirit in an organization is fundamental not only in operating in a world full of uncertainties but important to the individual person with his/her basic needs to developing his/her potentials to the fullest.
The team approach stresses the importance of human beings making up organizations. People make things happen and how they behave and treat each other is to make the core relationship either a hellish or a meaningful experience. Principles and practice The “ Team Trainer… ” is essentially divided into two parts – principles and practice. Numerous cases and examples are used to illustrate how and why the team operates.
Quotes from respected personalities from the academe and business world are used to stress the arguments for the team approach. Using simple language and almost conversational, the authors narrate specific experiences of different organizations from which basic operative principles of a team are illuminated. Thus the experience of Xerox Corporation, for example, was used to illustrate the difference between teams, essentially two types, traditional and transformative. A difference anchored on the degree of involvement and participation in the team effort. Traditional teams tend to be authoritarian, with members compartmentalized in their specialized functions and communication centralized.